The Caesar salad was created in Tijuana and it’s named after the guy who created it.
Julius is out here taking credit for everything.
Yeah, a lot of thinks supposedly named after Ceaser are not. As you said about the salad, similarly people belive that Cesarian sections are named for him too, but the name actually comes from the Roman law, Lex Caesarea, which mandated cutting babies from dead mothers to save the child, the word caesarea believed to come from the Latin words caedere (to cut) or caesones (infants born via postmortem surgery). And Little Caesar was a nickname for the co-founder of the company, Mitch Ilitch, bestowed on him by his wife.
deleted by creator
The Russian word for emperor or king “царь” (English: Tsar) comes from Caesar.
I think being such an influential ruler that countries use your name to mean ruler is a little more impressive than a salad.
Same for German Kaiser which sounds quite different
Not if you pronounce it correctly. Cesar was not seesaw but Ke(tamin)sar(in gas). And Ke-sar to kei-sar is pretty close.
There is no one “correct” way to pronounce a language that’s spoken over centuries in such a huge area. The German is close to the classical pronunciation of Julius’ time while the Russian was borrowed much later when Latin already undergone a number of sound shifts. That’s why German Kaiser is very different from Russian царь as I said in my first comment and I hope you won’t deny that.
while the Russian was borrowed much later when Latin already undergone a number of sound shifts
The changes in the word aren’t from Latin, they’re Slavic in origin. They show the borrowing was rather early, and a bit messy:
- Latin ⟨Caesar⟩ /'kaɪ̯.sar/ →
- Greek ⟨Καῖσᾰρ⟩ /'kâi̯.sar/~/'cɛ:.sar/ →
- Gothic ⟨𐌺𐌰𐌹𐍃𐌰𐍂⟩ /'kɛ:sar/ →
- Common Slavic *cěsãřь; this should be around ['tsʲĕsa:rʲĭ] in IPA. Eventually shortened to *cãřь, roughly [tsa:rʲĭ]
Then either Russian inherited *cãřь, or side-borrowed it from Old Church Slavonic. Either way the ending yer got dropped, the long vowel shortened, and you get the modern Russian form, ⟨царь⟩ [tsarʲ].
/aɪ̯/→/ɛ:/ could be from Latin, Greek or Gothic; all three underwent it.
That /k/→/tsʲ/ change is the progressive palatalisation of Common Slavic. Something similar happened in Latin, but after Greek borrowed the word, and Common Slavic interacted way more with Greek than with Latin.
But the biggest change was that completely erratic shortening, from *cěsãřь to *cãřь. Wiktionary mentions this happened with English cyning→cyng→king and mistress→miss; I’ve also seen this happening with Portuguese ⟨senhor⟩ mister, dialectally rendered as “siô”, “sô”, “nhô” etc. (Plus its female form ⟨senhora⟩→siá, sá, nhá etc.)
TIL Thanks! I think my Latin teacher said it wrong to explain Latin sound shifts to us and I never looked it up.
To be fair with your Latin teacher, something similar could have happened in Latin. All the pieces are there; it’s just they don’t fit in time and place for this specific word.
Fun Fact: the Romans initially used “Caesar” as a title because their history as a republic made them leery of using “Rex” for rulers. Within a decade of the Western Empire falling meaning they wouldn’t be title shamed as fake Romans, the Eastern Emperors officially adopted “Basileus,” the Greek equivalent of “Rex/monarch” as a title that had been unofficially used for centuries.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basileus
Tl;Dr the Romans used Caesar as title because it would have been gauche to admit they were a monarchy again
Actually Caesar started this when he was holding a public speech where someone in the crowd addressed him as king, he downplayed it as a confusion of names and replied something like “No, it’s not Mr King, it’s me, Caesar” (It’s speculated that this was planned by Caesar to test the waters)
Naturally, as the Russian empire is the third Rome.
Don’t believe me? Then get out! gestures towards open window
Hey now, the Russian empire ended with revolution and eventually ended up turning into the current Russian empire (lol) but iirc they married off a Romanoff to Finland before the Bolshevik revolution, and Finland became a republic through weird government chaos rather than a direct overthrow of the government, so technically I think Finland is the true heir to the Roman Empire
He also has a month named after him. And all Kaisers and Tsars too
Not just a month, a whole calendar.
My working model of the future is that we’re simply on the dumbest timeline. The nutcases that think vaccines cause autism are running vaccine regulation. At this point, I’m just going to assume the stupidest outcome.
My prediction for the next cultural fever dream the right will go down? We need to reverse the Gregorian reforms and return to the Julian Calendar! Again, this is assuming we exist and remain on the stupidest timeline.
That escalated quickly…
And a method of extracting babies from the womb.
First one is Simón Bolívar, for those unfamiliar.
Yeah, but he was named after OG Caesar.
Oh right, the guy that invented that roll
everyone always forgets Chef Cardini
I thought the dog guy invented it
I think the “Victorian era” is only valid, when talking about English history.
For European history, I would use “Napoleonic era”, “age of revolution”, “age of nationalism”, for world history probably “age of colonialism”.
What about the US?
Napoleon was gone by the time Vicky came around, but “age of nationalism” might work. She reigned over the most important nation through that entire period that was industrial but not really modern yet (died 1901 IIRC), so it’s not surprising she’s become the byword.
Edit: I wonder if “Elizabethan” or “second Elizabethan” might become a similar umbrella, since she also reigned through a long and fairly distinct period. Probably not, unless monarchy makes a big comeback and future students of history care to label things that way.
What about 'em? I don’t know what about the US. They were still colonising, so they fall under the canopy of age of colonialism.
Nationalism, because many now-countries underwent the process of nation building. The focus went from being ruled by a monarchical house to being grouped with people of the same ethnicity, however that is understood.
This describes any settler nation but also Italy, Germany, everyone in the Balkan region.I forget the “industrial revolution” which is also a parallel era-defining development.
My opinion: Age of …
- Discovery: 1420 - 1600
- Colonialism: 1600-1980
- Enlightenment: 1720-1800
- Revolution: 1770-1850
- Industrial revolution: 1750-1900
- Nationalism: 1800-1920
- Decolonisation: 1950-2000
Btw, the German Wikipedia article for “Victorian era” literally says: “In British history, the Victorian Age (also known as the Victorian Era) usually refers to the long period of Queen Victoria’s reign from 1837 to 1901.”
That’s why I’m making all this fuzz, cause it’s not universal. Sorry for rambling.That’s reasonable. It looks like other people agree with you about the age of discovery, although I always thought of it extending longer. Australia and NZ were discovered by Europeans in the mid-1600s, and Siberia and Alaska (which are somewhat geopolitically significant) had ongoing exploration into the 1700s.
I’d also move colonialism at least back to Columbus.
Edit: Although, subjugating people to take their stuff was an ancient concept, and none of the atrocities along the way were really original either. When writing or speaking I tend to avoid the terms altogether, and go with “the Age of Sail” for everything, since the European invention of seafaring was the distinguishing variable that allowed both the colonisation and the exploration to happen.
We are now in the reign of King Charles III, or Chuck as I prefer to call him. We are now in the Age of Chuck, or the Chuckian Age.
Unironically, I call him Charlie IRL. There’s also Willie the Bastard and Liz the first. I get a kick out of it.
What about the US?
They got to name pubic wigs! /jk
Age of colonialism implies that colonialism stopped at some point, rather than being an ongoing thing that is still happening now
It really basically did in the decades after WWII. This thing called “neocolonialism” is a joke by comparison.
Better than that whole cutting a baby out of the womb thing
It’s a good salad though
Top: literally who?
Middle: literally who?
Bottom: SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS! BYTHINICA REGINA! LVTEE! REX IMMVNDE! If only Octavian had the same fate as this trash… the salad is not even yours, it’s Cesare Cardini’s! *mumbles further rage words*(inb4 Bolívar, Victoria.)
the salad is not even yours, it’s Cesare Cardini’s
To be fair Cesare Cardini was named after the Caesar so in a way the salad is also named after him.
BANNED FOR OPTIMATE SLANDER
Fug :D
Now I can’t merdipostare [shitpost] here any more!
And the fucking month of July. From julius.
Caesar salad is not named after ancient Julius Caesar.
Oh yeah well I got a dog named after me
Omg is that Mr Congo?
Why do we have to guess the people we don’t know?
