- cross-posted to:
- movies@lemm.ee
- cross-posted to:
- movies@lemm.ee
You must log in or register to comment.
Literally just ereasing a culture to make room for the new one.
From the article:
The films removed from Netflix include “3 Logical Exits”; “3000 Nights”; “A Drowning Man”; “A Man Returned”; “A World Not Ours”; “Ave Maria”; “Bonboné”; “Children of Shatila”; “Chronicle of a Disappearance”; “Condom Lead”; “Divine Intervention”; “Frontiers of Dreams and Fears”; “Ghost Hunting”; “Giraffada”; “Habibi”; “In Vitro”; “Like Twenty Impossibles”; “Maradona’s Legs”; “Mars at Sunrise”; “Omar”; “Salt of this Sea”; “Samouni Road”; “The Crossing”; and “Xenos”
I had never even heard of them having this content.
Musk is in regular contact with Putin, who makes suggestions about where Star link be turned off, or denied access to.
Bezos prevented the Washington Post from endorsing Kamala Harris.
Netflix is helping Israel dehumanize and erase Palestine and Palestinians.
A normal day in the US of A.
Remember… There is not a single corporation that gives a shit about you beyond your LTV (lifetime value) as a paying customer. “Pride week” and “Palestinian stories” type things are just mechanisms to get your money.
If they are told they make more money harming you, CEOs literally have a legal responsibility to choose that option. And right after they do, they will have an amazing dinner while laughing at how stupid you are and then sleep more peacefully than you have on the single best day of your entire life.
If they are told they make more money harming you, CEOs literally have a legal responsibility to choose that option.
No they fucking don’t.
They choose to do so out of greediness the vast majority of the time, but it isn’t a legal obligation.
Plenty are greedy psychopaths, I’m not saying the above as a forgiveness, I’m stating it as a fact. A CEO is a legal “corporate officer” of a company. Seems you need to learn a bit more about fiduciary responsibilities for a CEO. It is a legal obligation.
Maybe you’ll do some reading, probably not though, huh? The people in your life must be just fucking exhausted by that energy of yours.
Yes they actually do. Look up Dodge v. Ford Motor Company. A business must be run in the interests of the shareholders, not the public, not the employees, not even the business itself.
Is it morally right? Fuck no. Is it the law? Unfortunately yes.
You are actually not wrong but if they dont obey BoD, it is the shed.
Bigger question here if this “simplification” is a valid tactic to communicate the message.
Theoretically BoD could sue the CEO, but i dont think that ever happened in this context… Only in cases of fraud, ie stealing company assets
Something similar has happened. Look up Dodge vs. Ford Motor Co where the Michigan Supreme Court ruled that a ceo must operate in the interest of the shareholders not in the interests of the business and it’s employees.
And let’s not forget that most significant forms of “harm” are illegal in the first place. The comment above you makes it sound like any minute now, Nabisco might decide it’s more profitable for them to roll out to your house and kill you.
I mean… if something is illegal but the penalties are low or enforcement nonexistent then it’s more like a recommendation. Fines become a “cost of doing business”.
Has anyone ever been under the illusion orherwise? I’ve never seen anyone who thought corporations cared about them. And people don’t care about corporations either. They care about getting the shit they want at the price they want and will sleep very soundly if some corporation goes out of business.
Unfortunately I’ve seen quite a few people argue that companies are kept honest by the market and as such they’re trustworthy.
Quite a few? Wow! I would say that’s very naive but it would have to have an ounce of logic to even be evaluated on that scale.
Seems you live in a bubble friend.
One of the most popular kids toys are miniature brand name products that the parents buy for them…
people by M&M’s branded leather jackets for $300 and walk around as human billboards willingly…
people cover their cars with bumper stickers and get tattoos with logos showing their preferences between competing local coffee shops…
Goop, celebrity-fronted baby brands, etc are “lifestyle brands” where people purchase an identity and defend it against others…
Sports teams are corporations that people literally have bloody fist fights over…
Target is selling a Halloween costume and kids sized shopping carts and checkout stands and their parents are buying them… For money
What in the sweet sticky god damn FUCK are you talking about “was anyone under that illusion”?
Dude, Donald trump is a fucking corporation that elderly people eating cat food donate their pension checks to…
You seem to be delusional if you see NONE of that.
None of that is people thinking corporations care about them. You’re high. Get some sleep.
a lot of people have a hard time to believe that facebook, google, microsoft, etc cannot be trusted, or even that they don’t have good intentions (anymore?)
👑
CANCEL CULTURE
But have you considered that it’s working for them, now?
I gave Netflix a chance because of all the Palestinian content (I’m not even shitting) after being unsubbed for over a year since their underhanded tactics on family sharing, but I guess it’s time to cancel again.
There is no israel lobby within US companies.
This is just normal moderation to protect the vulnerable
How so?
That was sarcasm
See, that’s what I thought.
I need to spend less time on Israeli news sites and Reddit, but the whole point of visiting those is to see what the others think, but if you put yourself in an echo chamber you only hear the same things and I’m trying to avoid that.
I’ve just seen too many opinions exactly like that lately
Welcome to the digital age.
The Intercept - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for The Intercept:
Wiki: reliable - There is consensus that The Intercept is generally reliable for news. Almost all editors consider The Intercept a biased source, so uses may need to be attributed. For science, editors prefer peer-reviewed journals over news sources like The Intercept.
Wiki: reliable - There is consensus that The Intercept is generally reliable for news. Almost all editors consider The Intercept a biased source, so uses may need to be attributed. For science, editors prefer peer-reviewed journals over news sources like The Intercept.
MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Search topics on Ground.News
https://theintercept.com/2024/10/25/netflix-palestinian-stories-israel-movies/
How the fuck y’all managing to make this garbage bot even worse? Just stop.
There’s a pinned post right now where you can vote to kill the bot. I ultimately blocked it because it was at best useless - the sources I didn’t recognize it didn’t either, and I saw it endorsing British tabloids which is outright harmful. Maybe I would have liked the Wikipedia addition, because the spoiler tag works on my Lemmy client, but people already do this in comments in a more relevant way on an article to article basis.
Block it and move on with your life?
I will not turn a blind eye to harmful misinformation.
Then post a correction
It should not be my responsibility to go around posting corrections to misinformation. It should just not be posted in the first place.
Well, be that as it may, you only have 3 options in front of you; you can complain about it, shut up, or post what your problem is and why the others are wrong.
Right now, you haven’t even said what your problem with it is.
What part is misinformation even would be a good place to start.
What do you disagree with here?
Why don’t you just block everybody who doesn’t like it? Then it can just be you and the bot alone on all the threads.
