• @phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    857 days ago

    typically payments made to an official after an official act as a token of appreciation

    Am I taking crazy pills or is this asshole just literally saying here that it’s okay to be corrupt?

    • @rbesfe@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      53
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Don’t worry, it’s only okay if the payment is made after the act is carried out. Everyone knows that corruption follows a strict order of operations, which if broken, means it’s not corruption anymore!

    • @Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      46 days ago

      It removes one of the angles that made attempting to bribe someone risky: they could just take the bribe but then do what they were going to do anyways. Can’t really retaliate legally without admitting you tried to bribe someone and if they told anyone about it in private, then there’s a good chance that motive will come out if the official ends up dead.

      But now the whole process is going to be the official does the act and it’s the briber’s choice if they follow through.

  • @cybersandwich@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    877 days ago

    The way I read all of this and th decision is that they are saying that this law specifically only applies to bribery. They define it as a quid quo pro in advance of an act.

    In this particular case, you can’t charge the guy with bribery because it doesn’t meet the definition.

    That doesn’t mean a “tip after the fact” isn’t corrupt. That doesn’t mean that’s not in violation of some other law. It’s saying that you can’t apply this law to this case. This court is threading a fucking needle in an attempt to make this a state issue and say the Fed law can’t apply.

    Justice Jackson’s dissent is amazing though:

    Snyder’s absurd and atextual reading of the statute is one only today’s Court could love."

    The Court’s reasoning elevates nonexistent federalism concerns over the plain text of this statute and is a quintessential example of the tail wagging the dog," Jackson added.

    Officials who use their public positions for private gain threaten the integrity of our most important institutions. Greed makes governments—at every level—less responsive, less efficient, and less trustworthy from the perspective of the communities they serve,"

    • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      19
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      SCOTUS has routinely bent over backwards to protect politicians from corruption and bribery charges though so the message is clear. You cannot charge a politician with bribery except in extreme circumstances. Like them being a democrat.

    • @Snapz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      107 days ago

      “At every level” she’s making specific reference to a specific certain level in the US judicial system here… Some pretty good, brave activism three - good luck getting your mom a house from a billionaire now Justice Jackson

      • @I_Clean_Here@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        -37 days ago

        Your comment is nonsensical. Format that shit. And wtf, are you saying Judge Jackson is corrupt as well? You are making no sense.

        • TimmyDeanSausage
          link
          fedilink
          57 days ago

          Their formatting was dog dukey, but I was still able to parse what they were saying fairly easily. They’re saying “good job judge Jackson. Too bad you won’t be able to get a free house from insert evil billionaire here (/s)”. While I agree with your sentiment, the way you go about pointing these things out can backfire, if done with a rude tone, such as the way you chose to do it. There you go; an unsolicited constructive criticism for an unsolicited constructive criticism. :)

  • @31337@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    366 days ago

    If they ever flip back to a Democrat majority, it’s going to take decades to undo all the damage this court has done (and they’ll still have the incentive to not undo stuff like this).

      • @jorp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        -86 days ago

        Joe Biden nearly got 1 food truck in to gaza from the 300 million dollar pier and one of Israel’s bomb shipments was 10 minutes late thanks to him though. That’s bringing the left and liberals together.

      • @AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        96 days ago

        Then they at the end they give that know an extra twist by specifically mentioning two justices notorious for receiving substantial bribes rewards who didn’t feel the need to recuse themselves.

  • @Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    336 days ago

    Yet another thing that tens of millions of people across the country would instantly lose their job for, made even MORE ok for the people who can cause the most damage by doing it. Every corporate conflict of interest training I’ve taken at current companies makes it abundantly clear that even the APPEARANCE of a POTENTIAL conflict needs to be disclosed and handled appropriately. Never mind there being literal, in writing, cash money kickbacks.

    When it comes to having lower standards for state officials given special powers than we do for random schmucks, at least we’re consistent. From the lowest local cop to the highest federal politicians, why do we not only refuse to set standards but also remove ethical expectations?

    • @derf82@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      46 days ago

      Yet another thing that tens of millions of people across the country would instantly lose their job for

      Would they? Vendors in the private sector are constantly handing out goodies to clients. Sports tickets, food, gift baskets and more. Hell, I’ve seen vendors pay for vacations in the private sector.

      Also, as the case states, these things are largely illegal to varying degrees at the state level for state and local employees. This decision just said the Feds can’t pile on with additional charges.

  • @pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    507 days ago

    i love how the standard went from “the appearance of impropriety” to “you know what, just leave the money on the counter”.

    • @Snapz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      117 days ago

      NOT THAT COUNTER!!! That is the bribe counter! You put it NEXT the bribe counter so nobody gets the wrong idea.

  • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    377 days ago

    I didn’t think they could weaken it any further, you already had to get caught on tape exchanging money, laughing maniacally, and saying, “This is a bribe for X action.”

    Now you can do that, as long as it happens after the politician delivers. That’s a kickback. It’s the fucking definition of a kickback. They gave someone a contract and the contractor then gave the contract giver a large sum of money.

  • Chaotic Entropy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    35
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Politicians can legally be bribed after the fact now. Phew, what a relief.

    I guess step two is to decide exactly how many hours a bribe needs to be given, before doing someone a favour, for it to just be considered a gift.

      • Billegh
        link
        fedilink
        27 days ago

        It depends on how they’re delivered. Generally bullets are interpreted as a threat.

        • @bss03@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          17 days ago

          Vocabulary question X + shell + powder = bullet, what is X?

          Because usually the threat is that X will be delivered through use of powder the destination of the shell is ambiguous but not included in the delivery.

          When you deliver while (unfired) bullets it’s generally not considered a threat.

          • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            That very much depends on how the unfired bullet(s) is/are delivered. Did we leave a bullet on the lieutenant’s pillow or did we give the politician a box of the latest match grade hunting rounds with a bow on it?

  • MeatPilot
    link
    fedilink
    English
    347 days ago

    Next up “donor” patches for clothing, donor branded shoes, and donor outfits. Have our state officials look like NASCAR.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      fedilink
      -77 days ago

      I guarantee this is happening in your country too whether or not it’s legal.

      • @Nicoleism101@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        307 days ago

        Whether it is legal or not is the whole crux of the thing…

        If it isn’t legal then it is purely a matter of the skill of law enforcement. If it is legal then well, condolences.

        • @uis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          16 days ago

          If it is legal then well, condolences.

          Law enforcement still has their… ways. They might suddenly find bad of white powder.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          fedilink
          17 days ago

          it is purely a matter of the skill of law enforcement

          This is America. Law enforcement exists to protect the rich and powerful, especially from this sort of thing. The politicians get caught are just too stupid to figure out how to hide it.

          Also, as others have pointed out, this doesn’t actually legalize corruption.

            • Flying Squid
              link
              fedilink
              47 days ago

              That’s the bigger thing to have condolences about, honestly. In general, if you’re rich and powerful, you can do whatever the hell you want in the U.S. and the law will be on your side. That’s one of the reasons why it’s so amazing that Trump was found guilty in the New York trial.

              • @Nicoleism101@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                7
                edit-2
                6 days ago

                I hear you, well that’s just plain depressing, hope it changes at some point. Sometimes it has to get worse to get better.

                When the illusion of a successful country dissipates that’s when the real changes can be introduced.

                Unrestrained capitalism will never solve your country mounting problems that one I am sure. At some point the problems will become too severe to brainwash even the most easily influenced voters. As long as they have it good or ok, they can be recruited but there’s a limit and populism is inherently short-sighted and thus short-lived. It’s akin to burst of anger out of denial that can’t survive long in it’s powerful but unstable state of constant crisis. Trump is a harbringer of change and a proof that we hate changes but there’s nothing anyone can do to stop them and those trumps and such only accelerate the inevitable societal progress. I wouldn’t say let him rule because this would be unfair to many people but it will eventually pass and will be a building block for the better tomorrow.

                There’s no power in the world that could bring back catholic medieval society at this point.

      • androogee (they/she)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        I guarantee this is happening in your country too whether or not it’s legal

        So is murder, that doesn’t make it not bad if the highest court in the land makes murder legal

        Jesus Christ. What a comment. 🤦