• NinjaGinga [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        2 years ago

        That’s because they crossed the event horizon into such incredible density of wealth it’s impossible* to divest them of truly obscene amounts of wealth.

        *Unless someone does the thing in Minecraft

        • GrouchyGrouse [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 years ago

          Time is money. Life is basically just how we experience time. We’re not killing the rich. We’re taking away their money. By killing them. Look I don’t make the rules.

  • GrouchyGrouse [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    2 years ago

    Whoever started calling this LLM shit “AI” deserves to be shoved in a locker and then dropped into a canal. Techbro dweeb? Marketing ghoul? Some fuckwit internet cretin? I don’t care. Get in the goddamned box.

  • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    2 years ago

    I remember when article spinning was consider blackhat seo. Now it’s a feature of major mouse brands? Lmao.

    The biggest dickheads on the planet took over the tech companies. At least the nerds that originally built it actually cared about it like… Performing a function. None of these dickheads care if they destroy it. They’re not builders, they’re deconstructors.

    At some point along the line software technology companies went from building things into “disrupting” things and that change was essentially the act of going from constructors to destructors.

  • JayTwo [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    2 years ago

    From the blockchain to NFTs to the metaverse to AI.
    I wonder what the next tech marketing fad buzzword will be.

    • flan [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      2 years ago

      They’re going to combine it all into one thing and it’s going to be a colossal waste of money and electricity but they’re going to force it to be a thing for like 3 years until apple recoups 1% of the cost of developing the vision pro

  • HumanBehaviorByBjork [any, undecided]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    this was the peak of product design in the early 00s. “look, we added a brightly colored button whose only purpose is to open up our unoptimized crapware that no one will ever intentionally use. that counts as a feature, and therefore a reason to purchase our product instead of the competitor’s on next shelf”

  • flan [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I dont think this LLM in everything trend is going to last very long. It’s way too expensive for it to be in literally all consumer things. I can imagine it finding some success in B2B applications but who is going to pay Logitech to pay OpenAI $30 per million tokens? (Lambda for comparison is $0.20 per 1M requests if you pay the public rate)

    • FourteenEyes [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 years ago

      There will be another massive financial recession when it finally dawns on them this shit was never gonna make any fucking money for anyone

      • Owl [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        2 years ago

        The crypto bubble lasted a long time, and unlike it, AI actually does something (not anything useful, or terribly well, but something), so I expect the bubble will last a while yet.

    • Monument
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I disagree, because I think what will happen is that these companies won’t use “AI” that is hosted in the cloud, but will instead send some minimally functional model to users that runs on their GPU, and later NPU (as those become common), and engage in screen recording and data collection about you and everything the mouse clicks on.
      Disabling AI/data collection will disable any mouse technology or feature implemented after 1999, because AI or something.

      At this point, I think AI stands for “absolute intrusion” when it comes to consumer products.

      • flan [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        I don’t really see why they need AI for that but yes I imagine companies will want to deploy AI on user equipment. These aren’t going to be nearly as sophisticated or useful as what can run in the cloud though.

        • Monument
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          That’s sort of the point. It’s not really that the AI is useful, it’s that it’s the next big unregulated and misunderstood thing.

          Companies are using the idea of “training models” to harvest user data well beyond any reasonable scope, so they can sell it.
          The breadth of information that’s being openly collected under the guise of ‘AI’ was unconscionable 10 years ago, and even 5 years ago, folks would have been freaked out. Now businesses are pretending it’s just a run of the mill requirement to make their software work.

          Case in point of how commodified our data is: Kaiser Permanente intentionally embedded tracking software in their site and now has to class the collected data as a user data breach. These products are likely from Google, Facebook, Adobe, Microsoft, or Salesforce. And they share the collected data, which can easily be de-anonymized to their advertising partners, who share it with their partners, until it winds up in the database of a data broker. This has been known to be an issue for awhile: Some Hospital Websites May Be Violating Privacy Rules By Sharing Data With Third-Party Trackers.

          Anyway, sorry. Soapbox. I’ll put it away.

  • TheModerateTankie [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 years ago

    I love the future and I can’t wait until every aspect of my life within distance of a smartphone or computer is harvested for the benefit of AI generated “content”.

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      I have this grim vision of your phone ai summarizing your posting for the fbiai that will create a summary for the judgeai that will order your neighbors cousin drone striked based on the results of ai terrorist network modelling.

  • Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    This is not a new phenomenon.

    Anyone remember “Turbo” or “DTP”?

    Yes, there was a Turbo-mouse and a DTP-mouse.

      • Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’m going from memory. This was before the World Wide Web, when we still used dialup and serial cables, in the early days of the Apple LaserWriter when Aldus PageMaker ruled the world.

        If I recall, the mouse had a high resolution and extra buttons for things like copy and paste. Something about an ergonomic design comes to mind, but I’m not sure about that.

        I think that Byte! Magazine featured a review, but again, I’m going from memory here, this is in the late 1980’s when Desktop Publishing was the future of computing!