jmo [he/him, comrade/them]

  • 2 Posts
  • 21 Comments
Joined 6 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 16th, 2026

help-circle


  • I think you nailed the core challenge. It’s hard to doubt that the PSL is subject to deliberate and active sabotage by motivated parties like intel agencies and factions. That said the key issue is really one of professionalism. The point about creating the NDC is a good one and indicates that they see a problem and are working to address it. The issue I see, and that this statement shows, isn’t that there’s necessarily a cult around the central committee, it’s that there are social cliques throughout the leadership. Another commenter alluded to facebook drama and I think that’s a good way of describing it.

    The PSLs goal is to build a cadre of professional revolutionaries, which is a good goal and it’s something that they seem to do fairly well. What this incident and response indicate is that, regardless of hostile external parties, an organization with leadership bodies that have a number of insular social circles will necessarily be vulnerable to this sort of problem. It seems to me that it would be worth the PSLs time to investigate how other ML parties have acted to avoid these kind of issues and implement steps to mitigate against future incidents.

    Last but not least, while the restorative justice angle they reference in the letter is a good one it’s still reasonable to hold leadership to an extremely high standard. I personally agree with the approach they describe in the initial response but at the same time the fact that a central committee member got drunk and acted inappropriately at a party function should be sufficient to remove that person from leadership going forward. As Mao said, “a revolution is not a tea party.” We can hold leaders to our highest standards without undermining the process of restorative justice.