Assume that the future can change based on your actions, so any historical information that you bring along with you from the intervening 25 years may quickly drift out of the new realities history.

Edit: also assume that you can be given a healthy 21-year-old body if you want or take your previous self’s place.

Further, identification will be provided for you if you were not born at that time.

  • @Delphia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    1151 year ago

    Simple. Im ripping up the ticket.

    Since my actions have knock on effects and the ticket is 1 way that means Id have to abandon my wife and child and given how much my actions would change things, effectively unmake my daughter.

    The worlds fucked, I might be able to unfuck it but theres a better chance Id just create a different flavor of shit sandwich. But to know Id never hear “Dayyydeee come pway wif meeeeee” again.

    Fuck it. Let it burn.

    • BizarrolandOP
      link
      fedilink
      121 year ago

      What would your response be if you could take your family with you?

      • @Delphia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        12
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Id need seed money so Id get the lottery numbers for the biggest win shortly after I arrive, digital copies of the worlds financial newspapers for 25 years, some targeted stock info on companies like Google, Amazon, Apple, Intel, facebook and other “Big Tech” and media firms. Knowing when to buy certain stocks and when to dump them would allow me to slow grow myself into someone that could have serious levels of control over a vast number of industries with far reach.

        To make an impact with that reach, Id also have a serious SHITLOAD of research papers for anything related to green energy, cancer research and any other medical research that could save a shitload of lives. With 25 years of “leaps and bounds” in tech and medicine up my sleeve Id start a green energy company that knows which competition to buy and when, what “suggestions” to offer my researchers when I stop by for a visit. Same with biotech and medical research.

        Given 25 years Id be a global renewable energy mogul who has done more to cure cancer (especially in kids) aids and a host of other diseases than any other man in history, controlling significant portions of the mass media in every first world country I could get my hooks into AND with the ear of very serious people in academic circles… Id be a fucking kingmaker with such an amazing public persona that to come at me would be career suicide for anyone in politics.

        • BizarrolandOP
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          You could theoretically also download every single patent that has been filed in the last 25 years and then go back and patent them earlier.

          I’m pretty sure being able to release lithium ion batteries in 2001 would make a dramatic change in the world and make you a billionaire in and of itself.

          Perovskite solar cells would be a great follow-up to that, and you could revolutionize computing by knowing how to make raspberry pi’s.

          Obviously as you work your way up the tech tree you need more and more money and more and more time but once you have the blueprints for the technology everything after that is money and manpower.

          For instance, risc v is Open source hardware. You could quite easily develop the lithography processes needed to create the CPUs and be a thousand steps ahead of Intel in developing cutting edge top of the line computers. Combine that with releasing a modern Linux kernel with an OS to match for free along with the hardware purchase and you could completely destroy Microsoft, Intel, AMD, Apple and Google in a fell swoop.

          In 1999 I think the fastest processors were at what 300 MHz, maybe 600 something like that, Risc V processors are commonly available today running at 1.85 GHz along with graphics abilities that would blow away anything that existed in 1999.

          You would also need to redevelop flash storage and RAM to match, and it would probably be a good idea to roll out Wi-Fi as well, but if you had a billion dollars by the year 2000 and all of the equipment you could easily see these things being released by 2005 and not be beholden to any shareholders.

          • @Delphia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            51 year ago

            See I think that you’re thinking too “directly” which would make you enemies and draw too much attention. Coming out of nowhere with unproven ideas 20 years in the future… People are going to ask questions.

            By owning my own green energy and biotech companies I could hire the people who would eventually make the breakthroughs themselves and drop breadcrumbs in front of them “You know I was reading your paper on blah blah blah and I’m by no means an expert but it seems to me like yadda yadda yadda might be worth looking into” because when I back the money truck up for the 3 leading researchers into Lithium Ion batteries in the world because I’m “Passionate about green energy” it stands to reason that we would make radical breakthroughs and patent them.

            And I was just lucky enough to buy a lot of bitcoin when it was cheap and sell just before peak, I got out of real estate just before the crash in 08. I supported presidential /Prime Ministerial candidates when they announced they were running because “I have faith in you Mr Obama”

            I dont need to make breakthroughs, I just need to make sure I surround myself with people who will make them and ensure I get myself a cut of the profits. Me being involved will have people lining up to pour their money into the pile.

            Oh and while I’m at it Ill cozy up to that sick fuck epstein and sink his boat way fucking earlier.

          • JokeDeity
            link
            fedilink
            31 year ago

            Part of me thinks it would be hard to convince people you were from the future, but I think if you did all this, everyone would be certain you were.

          • @teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            Was there a specific breakthrough you’re referring to with Li-ion batteries? Because they were discovered several decades prior to 2001. Maybe just getting manufacturing and mass production infrastructure up and running?

            • BizarrolandOP
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Well yes, goodenough invented them in 1991, but the density increases that tripled their capacities and themanufacturing capabilities that decreased their cost to manufacture by a factor of 10 didn’t happen until the mid-late 2000s.

              There are also other battery technologies that you can release like glass batteries which are still being worked on today.

              You could use modern tech to get a 30x increase in their ability per penny and corner of the market.

              • @teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                2
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I think taking over the tech industry like this might be the most difficult strategy to take over the world. Firstly, the only way all of that info fits in a backpack is either if you commit it all to memory (which no single human has ever done), or you load it all onto a hard drive and keep it secret the whole time you’re in the past.

                Second, if you do manage to keep it secret, you still need to know it well enough to leverage it to convince the Intel’s and AMDs of the world to fund you to create these advances in technology. A random homeless person who magically knows how to execute EUV lithography probably isn’t going to be given the time of day to prove it.

                If you can’t keep it secret, and it leaks, you’re now useless and the Intel’s, AMDs, etc. with more resources will kick you to the curb and do everything themselves.

                The lottery/investing strategy is probably the more lucrative strategy, depending on how much of a difference the butterfly effect makes.

                • BizarrolandOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  21 year ago

                  I was assuming that the order of priorities would be to first identify the best lottery that you can win within like a 1-month period of your arrival, and then immediately follow that up with purchasing the best stocks that you possibly can purchase that will 500x your lottery winnings within the next 2-4 years.

                  Once you have those in place then acquiring capital via bank loans and Angel investors to do things like build and develop lithography machines to roll out your brand new processors and the flash storage and ram that runs it would be a comparative Cakewalk.

                  Obviously it would be much more difficult than just waving your hands but considering that you should be able to turn 15 or 20 million US Dollars into a billion+ dollars within 2 years then people should believe that you are some sort of vunderkind and follow you around and do whatever you tell them to do and hopes that some of your money will rub off on them.

      • @Delphia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        Dont want to do that either if it means abandoning my daughter. If I was going to do it I’m doing it benevolently.

    • squiblet
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      We don’t really know what would happen to this reality. It might just flicker and vanish away. But if you had a new daughter, she might be awesome too and without the time travel, would have never existed.

    • @CADmonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      That’s kinda where I’m at. My wife is probably the entire reason I’m not either dead at my own hand or crazy. And meeting her was a complete accident.

    • @tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      There is a subplot in the INVINCIBLE comics that follows this very premise, and chooses the same decision you do for the exact same reason

  • @drolex@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    69
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I come with scientific evidence of the impeding doom that will be brought by climate change and urge the world’s powers to reduce greenhouse gas emissions while there is still time! Surely everybody will listen to my proofs and act to protect the world!

  • @CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    49
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Lottery numbers and a historical record of the stock market: first, win lottery then invest based on performance

    Become a billionaire, then join the oligarchy and use my stock knowledge to bankrupt the rest of the oligarchy

    • @CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      391 year ago

      At some point, wouldn’t having future knowledge of the stock market either lead to you changing the stock market with the presence of your money until your predictions lose their accuracy, or else get you investigated for insider trading due to it being statistically insanely unlikely to be that lucky?

    • Dharma Curious
      link
      fedilink
      141 year ago

      … It freaks me out that is exactly my plan that I’ve spitballed in the shower several times.

    • Zellith
      link
      fedilink
      6
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Bear in mind that logically, the longer time goes on and the more you interfere, things will diverge. You might only be able to win the lottery a handful of times before the butterfly effect starts giving you numbers which don’t match your predictions from the future. I figure the same thing happens with investments. If someone buys a tonne of shares using billions, the history of the stockmarket will change and over time be unreliable outside of certain events. Might be wise to buy up aquire certain talent though.

      • timicin
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        make your billions by buying lots of small, but super profitable investments.

    • squiblet
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      Yeah, just buy Apple, Amazon, Google and Facebook when it comes out and you’re all set.

      • Bonehead
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        Also, start generating Bitcoin in late 2009 and sell it all on Nov 10, 2021.

        • BizarrolandOP
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          Sell it when it’s in the 10,000 range the first time, circa 2015, then buy back when it drops to 400 in late 2016 and then hold

  • @hightrix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    321 year ago

    All of Wikipedia on a thumb drive

    List of winning power ball numbers for the past 2 decades.

    $20 cash to buy bitcoin

    That’s enough. More than enough money to never work again and info to help stop 9/11, etc…

    • @grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      161 year ago

      $20 cash to buy bitcoin

      Bring a 2023 model computer back with you and you could just mine all the bitcoin yourself.

      Hell, you could even temporally-plagiarize Satoshi Nakamoto and invent it yourself.

      • @hightrix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        201 year ago

        This is a great idea but it requires effort and if I were to mine 10billion bitcoin very early, that may change the future of bitcoin such that it never hits 30k+ value per. It seems safer to simply buy 1000 of them at a $0.10 to resale at 10k+.

        My plan is minimal effort, minimal impact to anyone that isn’t me, and to get all the money I could ever need.

          • BizarrolandOP
            link
            fedilink
            41 year ago

            I have a theory about NFTs.

            One of the issues with running any system on the internet where users can upload files is that you have to store those files and make them accessible to people.

            Which is fine. But often times users will upload the same file repeatedly or with only minor trivial alterations and that is how you end up with a multi petabyte server farm completely full of duplicate memes and reposted video content.

            If there were a system that could uniquely identify each and every single file that is uploaded to it and then on the fly cross compare that file with previous uploads and identify when the file is a duplicate, that would be very handy.

            If such a system like that existed, then system would only need a single copy of the file to share out to every single person that wants to view it, saving possibly hundreds of gigabytes of storage space.

            Something like NFTs could be used to accomplish that, if it were fully fleshed out and developed.

            It would probably need one of the new neural network systems overlaid on top of it to analyze the content and cross compare it, and to single out minor differences and create overlays to account for them.

            For instance, if you have a base image on knowyourmeme.com, then all the AI would have to do is separate a layer that contains the text in text format with the information of the font that is displayed on top of the image, and it could share up millions of variations on a base level meme for only a few megabytes of storage space for the text information.

            If your computer system already has the base meme file on it rather than sharing the entire file to you it could just share the text overlay to your computer and decrease transmission file sizes and time as well.

            • silly goose meekah
              link
              fedilink
              4
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              If there were a system that could uniquely identify each and every single file that is uploaded to it and then on the fly cross compare that file with previous uploads and identify when the file is a duplicate, that would be very handy.

              That exists. And we could probably even make something that recognizes small changes like added text on the image and save the data accordingly, probably using some kind of neural network as you later mentioned. The issue is just that that would be extremely computationally expensive, so companies usually choose to just buy a shitload of HDDs. Maybe something like this might be more feasible with quantum computing at some point.

              Something like NFTs could be used to accomplish that, if it were fully fleshed out and developed.

              What makes you think that? An NFT is basically just an ID card with extra steps. I don’t see how NFTs relate to the problem you described at all. Just because most NFTs the public heard about were somehow tied to images or videos, doesn’t mean that NFTs are a technology for detecting duplicate images/data in general.

              • BizarrolandOP
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                I mean nft’s basically serve as a identifier for a file. So if you can identify the file then you can set it as a base image and then cross compare with that identifier. Idiots are using it to like have some sort of weird digital ownership of something but that’s not its ideal use case

                • silly goose meekah
                  link
                  fedilink
                  5
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  NFTs are non-fungible tokens. They are literally made for claiming some sort of weird digital ownership of something. There isn’t really another feasible usecase for that technology, even if I agree that that hasen’t been done in a meaningful way yet. If you want to identify the files in that anti-duplication system of yours you are better off using just a regular incremental integer or GUID or something. No need for all the extra steps to the ID card

    • @IIII@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      Your smartphone probably has a comparable amount of processing power to some of the earlier mining farms. May as well just mine the bitcoin

      • @hightrix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Oh yeah, definitely. I’d take all the numbers because I’d assume at some point history would change such that the record wouldn’t be perfect forever.

        I’d win one that is over a billion. Then quit.

  • A healthy 21 body and 1999? Fuck taking over the world, and I don’t need your stinking backpack, just tell me where to get that ticket and where to show up, I’m not going to miss this! I’m taking a cyanide pill though when 2020 rolls around; I’m not doing this shit again.

      • BizarrolandOP
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        One of the reasons why the coronavirus vaccine was created so quickly was that the work was already 90% done.

        If you orchestrated things that you would be a billionaire by the 2010s, you could purchase the company that designed the vaccine and make sure that they are appropriately funded so that the vaccine for coronavirus would already exist at the time the pandemic struck.

  • @LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    211 year ago

    I would have no inclination to take over the world. But if I could go back to that date, I would make a million different decisions over the next few years to steer my life in a much wiser direction.

  • Cyborganism
    link
    fedilink
    201 year ago

    An entire offline copy of Wikipedia up to Jan 1 2024 on a tablet. Having all the world events up to that date available to consult at my fingertips, I could use it in so many ways.

      • akatsukilevi
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        USB 1.1 was already around in 1999, USB 2.0 being released in 2001 with Mini-A/AB/B being available in 2001, and the standard Type-A as early as 1996.
        Take one of those USB Type-A to USB-C and you’re good enough until circa-2008 when USB-C starts to get around

        • DeepFriedDresden
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          USB-C wasn’t designed until 2014. So yeah you’ll need a charging cable regardless

          • akatsukilevi
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            Even nowadays USB-C devices aren’t the de-facto yet(specially true in 3rd world countries like mine), Mini-B and Micro-C are still fairly common(tho really limited compared to USB-C), so depending on the devices being taken, it might not be that much of a trouble

        • brianorca
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          But the old USB chargers didn’t have high speed charging (2+amps) until much later. Most cell phones can’t charge effectively from the original 0.5A standard USB.

  • @Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    201 year ago

    Get every flagship CPU and GPU from 2000 to today that I can get my hands on. Also as much open source code as I can get hold of. And especially AI stuff - there’s several fully open source models, so bring those, and as much technical writings on them as possible.

    Speaking of which, download every science paper published since 2000 that I can get hold of, in every possible field.

    Get as much info on the 2000 election as possible, to hand to Al Gore, see if he can win that election with a solid unassailable margin.

    Research stocks, lottery, and everything else I can to get fast money within the shortest possible period of time after I get there, so I can get super rich before the butterfly effect makes predictions impossible, I need billions in seed money and I need it fast.

    Then use that money to start a private research group, and hand them all the scientific papers I brought. Get those experts to work studying all this knowledge and figure out what can be turned into practical technology. Turn some of this into profit-making devices to fund continued development, but release as much as possible for free.

    Essentially, deluge the world in as much new technology as possible, mostly free and open source, holding back only as much as necessary in order to fund continued research.

    And oh jeez the pharmaceutical industry. Release for free every drug made since 2000, so the pharmaceutical industry can’t get their patents in them.

    Big list of stuff there, but if I pulled off even half of it, the world would probably be a much better place in 25 years than in my original timeline.

    • @Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      It’s a really smart way. Very interesting, and I agree. It would probably be the best course of action.

      I only wonder how quick the butterfly effect would have effects on your “future” documents.

      For example, helping Al Gore win could drastically change the imminent future.

      • @Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        That’s why most of the stuff is technical or scientific information for the researchers; things that aren’t subject to change, just technical info. The money stuff I would hope to manage in less than 6 months from my arrival, because even in that short time I’d expect a lot to change by the end of it.

        It’d just be a question of getting that initial funding off the ground with which to set up my research institution. After that, the few things I don’t release for free should cover expenses.

        Sidenote since I didn’t address it in the original reply, taking over the world is impractical even with future knowledge, but as the person in charge of this outfit that would quickly be the world’s most advanced research tank, I’d probably have a lot of influence, which is the best anyone can practically hope for, I imagine. A lot more than the last 25 years of advancement would be needed to actually take over I figure.

    • @Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Get every flagship CPU and GPU from 2000 to today that I can get my hands on.

      What use is that? Without the asml duv lithography machine, no one could duplicate it. And you’d have no motherboard to plug those chips into.

      • @Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Honestly, I don’t know for sure since I’m not an expert; my reasoning was the hope that being able to examine the entire line of advancement would allow the necessary technical knowledge to be extracted and duplicated. I knew that just bringing the latest one would definitely do nothing.

  • @sciencesebi@feddit.ro
    link
    fedilink
    171 year ago

    Information is power. A simple smartphone loaded with major historical decisions, sports results is enough to make you a billionaire. Take some tech textbooks to stay ahead of the game, maybe some newly developed medicine.

    • BizarrolandOP
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      Given that the AIDS epidemic was still in full swing at the time, just being able to teach medicine makers how to make pRep would make you a billionaire just from the licensing fees.

        • BizarrolandOP
          link
          fedilink
          91 year ago

          Prep is an anti-hiv pill.

          If you engage in practices likely to expose you to HIV you should use prep.

          If you have pRep in your system and you are exposed to HIV there is a high likelihood that the pRep will destroy the HIV and prevent the infection from ever taking hold.

          Of course, it won’t do anything to protect you from the other potential negative consequences of risky behaviors that would expose you to HIV, but considering that it helps protect you from one of the worst potential outcomes it’s essentially a godsend.

    • @SteveTech@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      Just thought Kiwix seems like it’ll be handy here, it lets you download Wikipedia and some other websites, and they have an Android app to view them.

      (They have a web version too, which I actually selfhost for if the world ends or something /s)

  • @val@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    141 year ago

    I’ve got no motivation to take over the world, nor am I sure it’s really possible in a life time. I don’t really have a non-boring answer to this hypothetical.

    If the ticket is available anyway I’d happily take it, I’m single at the moment with no dependents and being younger and healthier would be huge. There are lots of ways to make money with the knowledge of future history, even if it’ll change when you start impacting it, and any one of them could make me wealthy enough to never have to work again in my life and do so wherever I please.

    I’ve never really understood the need of the rich to continually amass wealth or how they spend it.

    • @detalferous@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      Bitcoin has outperformed stocks by about 100,000-fold. All you need is a fiver to invest at the beginning.

      • BizarrolandOP
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Note that that return is only for the early investors. If you are incredibly lucky and we have a very flush couple of years you might triple an investment in by 2030 now. But you are also very likely to just lose it All

  • @eluvatar@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    131 year ago

    Probably a backpack full of smart phones, go sell them and retire.

    Then cry that it’ll be a long time until I can use USB C again.

    • BizarrolandOP
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      That’s a good idea but I wonder if anyone would buy them? Obviously the technology inside of it would be a quantum leap for any tech company that could get their hands on it. AT&t or ma Bell or Motorola would all easily fall over themselves to hand you several million dollars for it just so that they could have their top researchers reverse analyze the equipment.

      The downside to that issue though is that it would be very difficult to get in contact with the right people to sell these devices at the right price.

      • @LastYearsPumpkin@feddit.ch
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        Any current smartphone would be the best digital camera that exists by a mile, even if they didn’t have Internet access.

      • That kind of technology is hard to get any value from. Nothing in modern phones is innovative, and most of it would be an obvious evolutionary step to any specialist in their field.

        Mostly, though, the phones would be useless. Cellular networks were in their infacy, and none of the standards or technology existed to charge them. Reverse engineering anything in them would be hugely expensive, for little return.

        Smart phones would be interesting, but far less interesting than the existance of a person who has access to future technology. I think op would dissappear into a government facility not long after trying to pawn their goods.