Main proof how one county the Democrat Senator and all other Democrats got all the votes, yet Harris got ZERO, and Trump got all the votes. This was New York and experts say that is not how people vote. Not saying some wouldn’t vote that way. But zero votes for Harris is in itself suspicious. Add in the fact that when they spoke to people in that county they found large majority hated Trump.

There is no such county. You’re misremembering a story about a few voting precincts, precincts whose strange voting patterns are completely explainable due to their tight-knit Hassidic Jewish communities in them that vote in lockstep and select which candidates to support collectively. Those same precincts have exhibited such anomalous patterns for years. The Jewish communities there vote in lock step, deciding together what candidates to support. And they decided not to support Harris while still supporting other Democratic candidates. This was debunked ages ago, but you’re still spouting it off.

There was a lot of cheating in that election and Elon admits as much that he hacked and rigged machines in key states.

Bullshit. He never admitted anything of the sort. There’s a few rumors that go around, all stemming from claims that Elon made about knowing the results with certainty in advance. But that could easily have been just some analytics he saw from inside twitter or gambling sites. I’ve seen lots of people repeat the claims you’re making, but when asked precisely how Musk was supposed to have rigged voting sites, they respond with pizzagate-level logic like “Elon used Starlink to hack voting machines!” But Elon has never come out and said he rigged the election. You’re making shit up.

Kamala did not perform outside the margin of error of polls. The race was a tossup favoring Trump going into the election. Harris was carrying the mantle of an unpopular president and threw away her one chance by shitting all over her most ardent supporters in an attempt to pander to moderate Republicans and please her donors. Election fraud is something you should seriously worry about if a candidate with an overwhelming lead in the polls manages to somehow lose. But Kamala’s loss was entirely in line with the path of her campaign.

Occam’s Razor. Kamala’s performance was entirely in line with the polls leading up to the election. The simplest explanation is she was simply an unpopular candidate and lost.

The reason bringing up these theories makes you sound like a crazy person is that you’re using the logic of a crazy person. You’re misremembering stories and making baseless accusations with no evidence behind them. You don’t even have a coherent theory of how Musk could have stolen the election. It’s all just a vibes-based, “something something Starlink something something.”

Your craziness is best exhibited by your description of the lawsuit. You didn’t even bother to look up the lawsuit or see where it went or why it ended. You just went straight to crazy town and insinuated that the people bringing it were murdered to silence them.

Evidence: I haven’t heard anything at all about a lawsuit.

Conclusion: It must be a murder conspiracy!

This is seriously paranoid thinking.

Don’t be Blue MAGA. There’s plenty to criticize Trump for, plenty of actual crimes to point out. There’s no need to go full MAGA and collapse into conspiracy theories.

Supermarket bread in Europe has more sugar than Subway bread

Uuh no, at least not where i live, maybe those packaged sliced white breads but no one sane eat those as normal bread, that shit is gonna get paired with Nutella or other things

Supermarket bread in Europe has more sugar than Subway bread.

Does it? The cheap store brand white square bread in Holland had no added sugar at all. It has plenty of artificial stuff, but not sugar.

https://www.ah.nl/producten/product/wi50856/ah-extra-lang-lekker-casino-wit-half

It’s at least restricted and banned in UK. Plus many more chemicals that are allowed in the US and not in Europe. So don’t preach US food safety to me.

Shitting in the US is easy in regards to food safety and science:

• European Union (EU): The EU follows the Precautionary Principle. This means that if there is scientific uncertainty about an ingredient’s safety, it can be banned or restricted until proven safe. This more cautious approach leads to stricter regulations on many additives.
• United States (US): The US has a more reactive, proof-based system. Ingredients are typically allowed unless there is overwhelming evidence of harm.

This difference explains why Europe has restricted or banned many more chemicals in food and cosmetics than the US.

I know where I’ll buy my food and it’s not located in northern America.