• Burninator05@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    How can we call him a trillionaire if the wealth is effectively imaginary. If it isnt imaginary l, tax it.

  • Billegh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 hours ago

    What’s funny is that $1,000,000,000,000 is enough to give 18,000,000 families of four $35,000 (slightly above the us poverty live for a family of four), and still have over $350,000,000,000 left.

    Edit: maybe funny isn’t the right word…

  • itsBlorpinTime@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    The world is ruled by Trillionaires, and they really REALLY don’t like poor people. This is the same klepto grifter who suggested a political party for only the middle class.

  • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    “I have a hemorrhoid. It’s like an infected blood vessel on your ass. I’m nine years old, and I have a hemorrhoid, Stan. I have a hemorrhoid, and, Cartman has his own theme park.”

    Millions are homeless and starving, but hey someone got a trilly!

  • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Amazing how in the two years since Trump took office for his second term, his wealth has grown 5x.

    Five. Fucking. Times.

    He was worth scantly less than 200B back in 2024.

    In 2025, he went up to 342B. What is that like 75%?

    And how 3x since last year.

    Man everyone thought he was crazy for buying twitter. Him, Zuck, Bezos, and Ellison need to be first in line for the guillotines.

  • nonentity@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

    Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but trillionaires should be forced to transition into billionaires, and billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

  • SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    The billions these monsters are taking in comes from somewhere. The oligarchs are using the middle class for their personal piggy bank, while America self-medicates with cheap beer and reality shows.

  • brachiosaurus@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    12 hours ago

    If you use twitter you are directly to blame. Stop upvoting twitter repost, upvote serious posts that calls out elon musk not memes.

  • krisevol@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    He doesn’t have a trillion dollars. He worth a trillion because we are investing in his stocks. It’s not him preventing homeless, it’s everyone that buys his stocks.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    While I agree it is a moral failure it also seems like a direct attack on the populace. Did they go to war with the populace and not tell them? Let them make a formal declaration of war against their own citizens then see where all the shit falls. “/s” but not “/s”.

  • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    ·
    1 day ago

    What was the figure? All it would take to end world hunger is 500 billion or something like that? Half one person’s weath?

    What sort of person has that amount and decides not to end world hunger.

    • krisevol@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      He didn’t have that much money. He has stocks, and stocks from companies that don’t turn a profit won’t solve world hunger.

        • krisevol@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          California spends 1.5 billion already and hasn’t accomplished anything. You think 10 billion would fix homeless across the country?

          • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            We were talking about world hunger, but k. You’re obviously trying to pick a fight here on what was obviously not a concrete plan. I’m not sure if you noticed but I’m actually not an expert and don’t haven’t a 32 part plan on how to solve it. Instead pointing out the obvious fact that the man is worth more than the gdp of many nations and how none of that will go to help others, but please keep telling me how the idea of him helping is silly.

      • errer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        ·
        1 day ago

        The same kind of person who ends government programs that help those hungry people, killing hundreds of thousands of them

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Hunger is a political problem, not a money problem. You can’t just say “here are X billion dollars, let’s end world hunger”. Having said that, the system that allows people like Musk to get that rich, is also the same system that creates hunger.

      • xtr0n@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Here in the good ole USA money and politics are the same thing. If you have the political will, you can get the money and if you have the money, you can but the political will.

        That said, didn’t Elmo have a beef with the fucking United Nations because he said he’d pay the 6 or 7 billion to end world hunger if the could prove that it’s possible and then they produced a detailed plan and he quibbled and but-akshually’ed his way to a reneg because he never intended to do jack shit for anyone other than himself?

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      What it would really take to end world hunger is massive systemic change that’s actually pretty straight-forward but is fought by every single person who loves a deaperate workforce and their insane conservative followers who believe that their greatest enemy is a hungry person.

  • fdnomad@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    I don’t consider him a trillionaire. The stock he holds is of an unprofitable company. If he tried to hold a trillion dollars in his hands by cashing out on the stock, it would plummet, who would buy that at that price without the hype? If he cant hold a trillion dollars in his hands, how can he be a trillionaire? Its purely speculative.

    It’s like some ancient king claiming to be a trillionaire because a lot of people believe that there’s a ton of gold in his kingdom - without good evidence. There’s no guarantee he’d be able to mine enough gold to become a trillionaire, so why call him that?

      • krisevol@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        It’s not, not even close. He’s worth a trillion because investors are investing in him. If he tried to sell everything the 350p/e stocks would go to 20 instantly making him only with 10 billion. He still owes 40 billion on Twitter.

        He would be bankrupt overnight if he tried to sell it all