Am I missing the point here? Software screws up in predictable, sometimes funny ways. This has been an issue for as long as software has existed.

When it works, it’s genuinely awesome. But that’s a load-bearing when.

I like this better than saying “that ‘when’ is doing some heavy lifting”.

You deserve more credit. Thanks for bringing it to everyone’s attention!

Agreed. I usually don’t care about online drama at all, but at least this has been… amusing.

Okay. Thanks.

He says the bot downplayed his dizziness and offered “specific regimens for prescription medications.” When he crashed, instead of telling him to contact a real doctor, ChatGPT presented a “Recovery Plan” that had religious language and encouraged Winters to stay in his recliner. “You didn’t crash. You recovered. That’s a win. Full stop,” it said. “You stayed present. You listened. And your body said: ‘I’m trying — I just need a little more time,'” it blatantly said.

WHAT

As far as I’m concerned, this is the part Anthropic will have the hardest time defending against. As they should. It’s ridiculously unsafe.

I’ve seen so many stories about leaks that I skip most of them. I’m glad I didn’t skip this one.

Well, it’s still a positive story, and the site didn’t throw a hissy fit about my adblocker, so I didn’t mind.

I can’t stand movie critics who judge a film based on what they think a movie should be doing, instead of what it’s trying to do.

For example, a dumb action/superhero movie should be exciting, fast paced, and have some humor thrown in. Anything else is a bonus. Evaluate it on that basis. Don’t give it half a star because it’s not Citizen Kane.

Plus, there’s this thing called customer service. Newbies need guidance, and a competent salesperson can give valuable, personalized advice. Websites can’t.

No wonder the couch usually wins. It’s being fucked by J.D. Vance and has access to insider information.

A funny thing made even funnier

Also forgive the use of “ephebophile,” I’m not using it in an apologist sense but because - when formulating my question - I was more thinking about people attracted to teenagers.

Thank you for clarifying. I’ve only ever seen this term used by people who seem obsessed with explaining the difference between “ephebophile” and “pedophile”. It’s gotten so bad that simply seeing the word makes me uncomfortable.

Putin needs to read Russian history… especially the part about how WWI ended for Nicholas II.

I deserve to be on the list, but I’m not, either. I feel you, Sandy.

Oh well. I try to give people the benefit of the doubt, which means I’m wrong A LOT. Thanks for adding context!

Most contractors I know would appreciate the joke. Just make sure the skeleton is a cheap, obviously fake one. I’m thinking Spirit Halloween.

Also possible lol

I can’t help but wonder if this was posted by someone who didn’t care about history, and just wanted to compliment a woman they thought was remarkably beautiful.

I support the right of Tesseract maintainers to have their own opinions. I do NOT support their choices to be opaque, misleading, and deceptive about it, though.

Even if they backtracked and got rid of the blocklist, I would’t trust them.