This video is by Eric Hovagim an up and coming Tankie “reporter” and in his video he even unironically leans into China is just doing a “combatting terrorism”, just like the US gov does, amongs other things to justify chinas various human rights abuses.

Join the lemmy.ml boycott today and help foster a better Lemmy-verse! No more posts, comments (except to counter their propaganda ofc!) or upvotes on any comms on the Lemmy.ml instance! To make this easy you can do an instance block at Settings > Block Tab > Scroll to bottom > Input “lemmy.ml” and apply

And consider donating to individual instances instead.

Check the megathread for more!

  • TanteRegenbogen@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    45 minutes ago

    Luckily, I got .ml blocked on my piefed instance. Commenting from my feddit account because I am still working out the bugs on my piefed for example why I cant see posts from cm0002

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    If you push tankies hard enough, they will eventually admit that they are willing murderers themselves and it is about power grab. They call out violence from anyone but their own side. They will cite other revolutions and coups to justify advocating for their own, but simultaneously thinks the same other revolutions they are inspired from are bad while their own is better. They are like the Nazis who gaslight and use hypocrisy to their own advantage. Tankies/Marxist Leninists are rightfully called red fascists after all.

    • Thunderbird4@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I have some of them tagged for saying things like “people like you are the reason there will be gulags” and “you’ll get the wall too” directly to other Lemmy users.

      They’re determined that their superior philosophy will make the world a better place, no matter how many people they have to kill.

    • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      “Rules for thee, not for me”

      But they still get butthurt when you compare them to fascists, because they don’t understand the difference between ideology and methodology.

      Like, I could make that distinction crystal clear in my critique and yet they’ll still go “But mah communism! It’s a dictatorship of the proletariat, dumbass! Read more theory!” And then proceed to call me “blue fash” while trying to equate horseshoe theory to both-sides-ism 🙄

  • king_comrade@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I wish I had a proper Chinese source of news I could trust. I feel like everything that comes out of there is filtered through either Western or Chinese propaganda. Is there a Uyghur genocide? Ive heard all kinds of stories and at this point I have zero idea what’s happening there at all. All I know, is with extreme authority, comes extreme abuses.

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    people who are good in tech, sciences should really just concentrate on their craft instead of spouting something they dont know about, or care to research for validity of thier claims.

    • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Oh, they care to do research. They put a lot of research into confirmation bias, disinformation, and agitprop. It’s some of the most thoroughly researched bullshit out there.

  • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Yeah because the Western war on terror was so totally benign and respectful of human rights.

    The level of hypocrisy here is so wild.

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        My point is claiming China is fighting terrorism just like the US should be a criticism, not a defense. And these are people that (rightly) criticized US antiterrorism actions, so it’s bizarre to then act like similar things are totally fine and normal when China does them.

      • cm0002@infosec.pubOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I think that’s what they’re saying, pretty sure they’re calling out hypocrisy of the video itself not the post

  • Zetta@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ there’s lots of western propaganda here that doesn’t get pushback, I say just let all the propaganda flow together and get over it. Everyone is pretty much advocating for “just allow my propaganda only!!!”

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      its on you if you are drinking the koolaid of propaganda, propaganda more or less hsould be ignored and heavily fact checked for biases so you can be more informed what you are consuming. You are more or less like conservatives, they drink propagand whole sale without questioning it.

      • Zetta@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Are you dumb? I don’t drink the propaganda, I can see and identify it from all sides most of the time. I just get annoyed with people on Lemmy pushing one side and saying the other is bad. Their both bad.

    • ceenote@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      19 hours ago

      What is that quote about how the goal of a propagandist is not to get you to believe their lies, but to get you to believe everyone fighting them is just as dishonest?

      Anyway, yeah, no, not all sides on every issue are equally dishonest, and any sources found to be deceptive should be pushed back on.

      • Rose@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        12 hours ago

        That’s basically what the employees from the Russian troll factories were saying as well. Their goal was to sow discord and distrust. It played perfectly well into Putin’s politics of essentially saying that democratic countries are chaotic and there needs to be a strong hand to guide people towards order.

    • CheetahHybrid @pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      That’s a very centrist view. When you chose to ignore everything, you miss when anti-human behavior becomes normal.

      • Zetta@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Anti human behaviour has been the norm for governments in the west and other places for… Ever…??? I don’t ignore everything, my point was many people here ignore one side and push back only the other side.

    • fonix232@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      This view is about on par as bad as the propaganda itself.

      Propaganda by definition is something that isn’t true. It might be wholly untrue, or partially untrue, or twist facts in a specific way to evoke an emotional response while staying “technically” true - with the singular goal to smear the opponent, lest actual fact be debated.

      Political debate should always be about debating facts and adopting one’s view to reality, not twisting and churning reality to fit one’s agenda. It has to stay objective and factual for it to be worth anything.

      This is a mistake a lot of people make when it comes to debate. They take facts (often cherry picked, wilfully ignoring aspects that are contrary), draw conclusions, then treat those conclusions as the facts themselves and are unwilling to budge from those conclusions even when presented with further information that proves those conclusions incorrect.

      I have a perfect anecdotal example that happened just a few days ago. A right wing “commentator” published numbers of sexual assault reports in various European countries, comparing early 2000s to 2024-2026. The numbers have obviously increased, and this commentator immediately correlated it with immigration numbers - except for one country, Poland. This is obviously an overly simplified conclusion that disregarded things like reporting guideline changes (which means more cases are treated as sexual assault - e.g. in the early 2000s, an upskirt photo would have you charged with harassment in many countries but today it’s considered sexual assault), the improving trend of reporting itself (meaning women are less afraid to report if they’re assaulted, as police take it more seriously), and also the addition of spousal rape, which 20 years ago wasn’t really codified. The numbers are especially obvious in e.g. the UK, where reporting also includes the offender’s race - and the data clearly shows that each racial group tracked, roughly matches the makeup of the population (e.g. Asians make up ~9.3% of the population and around 8% of reported SA cases are committed by an Asian assailant, or ~82-83% are committed by white people and they make up ~82.9% of the population). If the increase in SA numbers was due to an increase of immigration, these percentages wouldn’t match up.

      But it’s incredibly easy to whip up some frenzy by omitting these supporting facts, and people are generally too lazy to look them up themselves. They see a narrative that resonates with them emotionally and go with it regardless if it’s the reality.

      This is the danger of propaganda. All it does is push people to the extremes and create societal clashes. It doesn’t help political debate, it snuffs it out, and leads to an inability to cooperate.

      Politics at the end of the day should be about cooperation, the ability to solve problems in a way that leaves everyone happy - or, more likely, the least unhappy. But how can you do that when everyone is frothing at the mouth because of propaganda? How can you have an objective debate when everyone is emotionally charged and unwilling to compromise, when the whole thing goes from supporting a view with facts, to supporting a team no matter what? This isn’t sports. Your allegiance isn’t to a team regardless what they do, but to a stance, to an ideology that can be debated - and if your team shifts their ideology to the point it doesn’t fit YOUR ideology, you should be under I obligation to continue supporting them.

      One should only have unfaltering loyalty to a single thing. Truth. Let that be scientific truth, historical truth, or personal truth. Propaganda is contrary to that. Therefore one should combat propaganda, regardless if it’s against their personal beliefs or in support of it. In fact one should be against propaganda especially if it’s supporting their beliefs. Because how can you say, with a clear heart, that you believe in something when you base that belief on lies?

      • edible_funk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Propaganda can absolutely be true, it’s just that purpose of propaganda is to further an agenda, not promote truth.

        • fonix232@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Do note that I did say it can be “technically” true.

          But it’s never the whole truth, because the whole truth is often mundane and uninteresting. The purpose of propaganda is to evoke an emotional response that pushes the observer towards supporting the agenda behind it.

          And partial truth, while might be true, isn’t truth. In fact omission of contrary facts IS a lie, making the statement ultimately untrue.

    • PugJesus@piefed.socialM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      The point of totalitarian propaganda is not to make you believe it, the point of totalitarian cacophony is to invalidate the notion of truth, so dipshits can shrug and say “Who can say, really? Everyone lies!” when word of fucking genocide comes out.

      • Zetta@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        I didn’t say “everyone lies”. No shit genocide is bad genious, my only point in that comment was that the vast majority of people on Lemmy are fine with propaganda from the West, but aren’t fine with propaganda from other countries.

        Maybe that’s not you in particular, you may see and call out western propaganda too but most don’t.

        Its the reason hexbear gets so much hate here, they aren’t really anyworse than other communities, the news and narrative they push just isn’t from your preferred government’s. I don’t agree with many of their opinions but it’s refreshing to see the other side.

        • PugJesus@piefed.socialM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I didn’t say “everyone lies”. No shit genocide is bad genious, my only point in that comment was that the vast majority of people on Lemmy are fine with propaganda from the West, but aren’t fine with propaganda from other countries.

          And your reaction to this is “Therefore, seeing more lies is refreshing”?

          Fucking lunacy.

          Its the reason hexbear gets so much hate here, they aren’t really anyworse than other communities, the news and narrative they push just isn’t from your preferred government’s. I don’t agree with many of their opinions but it’s refreshing to see the other side.

          Fucking lmao.

    • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      All propaganda should get pushback. Maybe western propaganda should get more but typically pushback is at least allowed.

      ML doesn’t even allow you to fact-check their propaganda. That makes it so much worse, even if it had an equal level of factual information as western propaganda (it doesn’t).

      • Zetta@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Fair points on ml not allowing criticism, but your last point about how Western propaganda is more truthful sounds sort of like somebody who’s been drinking the propaganda, you don’t really have evidence to support that claim I think.