The Apple MacBook Neo’s $599 starting price is a “shock” to the Windows PC industry, according to an Asus executive.

Hsu said he believes all the PC players—including Microsoft, Intel, and AMD—take the MacBook Neo threat seriously. “In fact, in the entire PC ecosystem, there have been a lot of discussions about how to compete with this product,” he added, given that rumors about the MacBook Neo have been making the rounds for at least a year.

Despite the competitive threat, Hsu argued that the MacBook Neo could have limited appeal. He pointed to the laptop’s 8GB of “unified memory,” or what amounts to its RAM, and how customers can’t upgrade it.

  • vane@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    He also described the MacBook Neo as a “content consumption” device, similar to an iPad. “This is different from the use case of a mainstream notebook," which can handle more compute-intensive tasks, Hsu said.

    I don’t know what Windows have out of the box but is MacBook really content consuming device ?

    Free build in OS offline office apps Word = Pages, Excel=Numbers, Power Point = Keynote, Notes, Calendar, Email, Reminders, PDF viewer = Preview, movie editor = iMovie, Journal, Password Manager = Keychain, Maps app ( yes you can download parts of map to use offline), Garage band where you can connect your midi devices and record them.

    • carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It has a mobile SOC which thermally throttles pretty aggressively, memory capped at 8gb, and a pair of confusing USB-C ports one of which is limited to USB 2.0 speeds.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I wouldnt have said content consumption but it is going to be a hit with students who will basically use a browser for everything. They have cloud office suites by default and apple has student subscriptions to offer.

    • some_guy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Despite the hits Asahi took losing two of it’s most prominent devs (one of whom is basically a wizard, as far as I can tell), I expect it to attract more attention than the more expensive devices because it’ll have a much wider potential audience. On top of that, lots of groundwork that was laid deconstructing the M1 and M2 chips means the team isn’t starting from zero, despite differences in the chip.

      It’ll take some time, but it’s basically guaranteed to happen and I think sooner is more likely than later.

    • some_guy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Computer people (like me) buy Mac minis, frequently as an extra device. Regular people who don’t care about computers beyond wanting a nice one buy laptops. I believe it completely.

  • brokenwing@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Dude, the difference between you and Apple is Windows 11. They don’t have a crappy copilot or Edge hoarding 4GB in the background just to show the weather.

    • Jrockwar@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      6 hours ago

      That’s a big difference but not all. The sub-$1000 ultrabook sector has SO MUCH garbage, like Intel Celerons that stutter when you scroll down a web page designed in 2022+. Manufacturers are happy because they can sell rubbish and uncle John with no idea about computers will say “I want a laptop with 1 TB so it’s faster, and it must have free office 365 and an antivirus”…

      So when someone puts a phone processor in a laptop and builds a chassis that isn’t a $5 extruded plastic shell, they panic because it still manages to be better in both benchmarks and real world use despite the paltry amount of RAM.

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Exactly. They should start installing Linux Mint and call it a day.

      Fuck Microsoft.

    • qat@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Indeed. PC manufacturers should just invest in the Linux ecosystem.

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 hours ago

    The industry problem is mainly that RAM makers do not want to piss off Apple, who has already had long term contracts set prior to rampocalypse. But 8gb linux native is a better product for systems that need to be offered at 8gb for affordability.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    14 hours ago

    The perfect time for a relatively cheap Apple laptop when Microsoft is forcing people to buy new hardware just to use their latest version of their operating system. I wonder what the percentage of Microsoft folks who go to the MacBook will be. I wonder what the percentage of users who go the UNIX/Linux route would be. I’m not an apple fan myself so would go linux, but a good business move from Apple though.

    • vacuumflower
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Apple user share is beneficial for Linux user share.

    • BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      That would be interesting to watch.

      If I ever had to buy a personal laptop again, it’d definitely make the list.

      Obnoxious hardware prices are what kept me off mac for so long. Now all prices are obnoxious maybe it would even out.

      Great move if they can capitalize on it

      • vacuumflower
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        They were making a lot on build quality, convenience, brand, ecosystem, cultism, software quality, but not so much on power.

        Now power became more expensive for suppliers, and for things listed before it you have to restructure marketing and everything. Apple doesn’t have that problem. They also have rid themselves of the legacy problem by two softer changes (dropping 32 bit Intel, then moving to ARM) instead of one hard change.

    • fallaciousBasis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Why would you move to Mac os?

      Windows still runs software from the 90s.

      Mac’s… Lol… Good luck with that.

      • Son_of_Macha@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        You can run Windows on the Mac with some amazingly integrated emulation software and all that 90s software is there.

      • Kiwi_fella@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I can’t see teenagers and 20-somethings going, “What I really want is a laptop that runs software from the 90s.”

        • fallaciousBasis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Just because you have no appreciation for history you think no one else does either?

          Just be nice to be so detached from reality

          • ShadyGrove@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 hours ago

            as much as I appreciate old software, I don’t think Mac’s target audience cares about it all that much.

  • CovfefeKills@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    15 hours ago

    It really is not appealing a mac air with 16gb RAM was $999 AUD and the NEO is $899 AUD. It’s a step backwards…

  • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    19 hours ago

    In Europe the price it’s not that appealing, it’s €699 and because they “care about environment 😉” the €99 charger (which is almost mandatory for a new user) is sold separately.

    At €798 for 256g/8g it’s not as good as the $599 they’re selling in the US.

    If someone is price sensitive, can get 3-4 refurbished ThinkPads with better specs for that price and run Linux much easier without hoping on some volunteer wizard to reverse engineer the proprietary components

    • Zak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      because they “care about environment 😉” the €99 charger (which is almost mandatory for a new user) is sold separately.

      It’s because they’re required by law to offer it without a power supply. See Article 3a, section 10.

      Apple’s first-party power supply isn’t “almost mandatory”, and doesn’t cost 99€. The 20W model shipped with the Macbook Neo in other markets costs 25€ on Apple’s German store, and a generic 8€ power supply from Amazon will work. The power supply most people already have for their phone will usually also work.

      • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        It’s because they’re required by law to offer it without a power supply. See Article 3a, section 10.

        the problem is not that, but that they are still including the price of the charger in the deal

        • Zak@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          How much cheaper do you think it should be for not including a 20W power supply? I’d be surprised if Apple’s cost for that part is more than 5€.

          • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            it should be cheaper with the full price of the charger

            in my european country, apple’s website says the 1 meter 60 watt usb-c charger cable costs 25 EUR, and the 30 watt usb c charger adapter costs 45 EUR. these are the most budget options I could find on apple’s site

            so, the devife should be 70 EUR cheaper, to be exact

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I also hate that they no longer ship chargers, but it’s a USB-C charger. Don’t most people have at least one by now? The Neo in particular doesn’t require a very powerful one.

      Now the fact that if you get an M5 Max 16" MBP which takes like a 100ish watt charger (can charge with slightly less, but with 20-30 it’ll be hopeless), you still get no charger, is utter bullshit because most people don’t have such a powerful USB-C charger around unless they’ve had a Macbook Pro made in the last decade already.

      “care about environment 😉”

      Most definitely something they’re doing for improved profit margins, but at the same time, slightly smaller boxes = more boxes per load of cargo = a bunch of CO2 saved on transport. Also they get to manufacture fewer chargers, as repeat customers won’t buy multiple chargers anymore. I do think the impact is significantly more pronounced with phones which get replaced more often and where the charger would take up a bigger percentage of the total box size.

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Got an L440, upgraded it to 16 GB and to i7, now it’s a beast. Had to “reset” its battery, otherwise it didn’t last for more than 20-30 minutes. Maybe will swap the screen to a 1080p IPS one and upgrade the WiFi/Bluetooth to modern standards.

  • Ice@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    Am I the only one even a little happy to see the head of a major company mentioning upgradability as an appeal for customers?

    Please do stick with two unsoldered SODIMM slots for your laptops Asus.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I don’t know what Asus is doing as I haven’t owned one, but some manufacturers are finally starting to do LPCAMM2. Which near me is actually cheaper than SODIMMs. And is technically superior. One reason (besides being able to sell you a new device when memory goes bad) that manufacturers solder RAM it is that it allows for faster speeds than SODIMMs, at lower power requirements.

      • bitwolf@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Really?!

        The only laptop I was with LPCAMM was a specific Lenovo laptop that used LPCAMM to connect to a SODIMM daughter board.

        Are there others you know of?

        • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Thinkpad P1 Gen 7 and the upcoming T14 Gen 7. The latter got 10/10 in repairability from iFixit, and the T lineup has always been great at longevity, repairability, and drive-over-it-with-a-tractor-or-pour-water-on-the-keyboard-survivability. I’m suspecting most upcoming Thinkpads will have it. Some Thinkbooks do as well, but I don’t trust any Lenovo without a Thinkpad name on it, and not even all of those.

          Dell Pro Max lineup as well.

          They’re only just starting to come out. Within the next few years I imagine most manufacturers will have offerings with LPCAMM.

      • rekabis@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        That may be the case, but the most irritating thing is that thy fill all available spots with the lowest-capacity chips that meet the requested provisioning spec, instead of taking the requested provisioning and using the fewest higher-capacity chips needed to meet the provisioning spec. The latter, at least, would leave spots open for an authorized repair location to manually solder on more approved chips of compatible spec.

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    I think the real shock is the quality of windows and Microsoft, and the pc laptop industry also… When everything about a pc laptop is worse than a mac laptop, why do we expect?

    It really is like no pc laptop manifacturer has pride in what they create anymore. They dont care if its a bad screen, shitty keyboard, horrible battery time. Just get it on market so the people can buy, and pay reviewers for good reviews.

    • invertedspear@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      20 hours ago

      It’s always super frustrating that even on “high end“ pc laptops they’ll use some shitty combined Bluetooth and WiFi chip that will bottleneck everything.

    • notgold@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I got me a dell rugged laptop and the build quality is excellent. It’s effing heavy but solid as anything.