Lutris maintainer use AI generated code for some time now. The maintainer also removed the co-authorship of Claude, so no one knows which code was generated by AI.

Anyway, I was suspecting that this “issue” might come up so I’ve removed the Claude co-authorship from the commits a few days ago. So good luck figuring out what’s generated and what is not.

sauce 1

sauce 2

  • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
    315·
    22 hours ago

    For example, “make this html grid sortable and add a download button that creates a csv file.” You know exactly what this does, it’s self contained, and it’s something you know can just be copied from stack overflow and applied to your code.

    Even if this works, you’ll be stealing someone else’s code without authorship attribution for anything that’s a non-trivial algorithm.

    • Auth@lemmy.worldEnglish
      51·
      11 hours ago

      Most devs are already doing that. This just saves them the time of doing it for themselves.

    • Jako302@feddit.org
      123·
      15 hours ago

      The copyright/license issues that come with it due to the current unregulated nature of ai are a completely different issue to the vibecode slop allegations.

      • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
        46·
        12 hours ago

        no. it’s one aspect of many. Using slop is ethically wrong AND it produces shitty code with zero innovation and creating technical debt.