• Mac@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    helped FBI adhered to Swiss legal requirements

    Are you guys expecting companies to break the laws of their own countries on your behalf?

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      49 seconds ago

      Nah, just expecting honest, straightforward marketing.

      Here’s an example:

      Hey we do E2EE and shit, but if you pay us for it, and the US government gets mad at you, we’ll fuck you.

      There, see?

      Honest.

  • zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    I mean, what’s the alternative here? The Swiss government, which they are subject to, issued a legal warrant. Any email provider you want to use will be subject to warrants. All of them.

    They are technically incapable by design of complying with warrants for email data. In this case they were able to provide personally identifying payment data because the person paid for their account with… a credit card. They offer crypto payment options, and would not have been able to usefully comply had the person used that method.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 minutes ago

      Mailfence has no idea who I am.

      Tuta never got any payment info outta me, though I do use them for official things tied to my actual id… but only those things, not other things.

      ???

      The alternative is to use an alternative.

      They are technically incapable by design of complying with warrants for email data.

      Fucking obviously not, this is far from the first time something like this happened.

      They could, you know, design the services they offer such that they are actually incapable of complying with warrants, by design.

      Payment info is the easiest, most direct way to identify a person, beyond uploading your actual government ID.

      Maybe, maybe Proton should stop acting like that is not fucking obviously the case, maybe they should make it more clear that if your threat model includes, I dunno, a terroristic theocratic fascist government, their currently existing marketing is extremely misleading to tech-normies?

      • zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I get the sentiment, but no serious company is going to survive for very long lying to its government when it receives search warrants. This is not a realistic solution.

  • Retail4068@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    Oh, proton caved to government warrant? ./mild shock

    Idiots expect them to pay salaries while ignoring government suppeona 🤦‍♂️. I was screeched at on a banned account.

    • TommySoda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Basically all they did was provide the credit card information because that’s the only information they had saved. It’s not like they just gave them his email or something like that. It’s one of the biggest reasons they let you use crypto to pay for your subscription.

      • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        For thoroughness’ sake, here are all of Proton’s payment methods.

        They accept:

        • Debit/credit
        • PayPal
        • Google Pay
        • Bitcoin
        • Cash (mailed)
        • Bank transfer

        If I were making an email address for a group allegedly connected to “arson, vandalism and doxing”, I would’ve definitely gone with Bitcoin. The fact that all PM were able to do in the face of Swiss authorities acting at the behest of the FBI was connect the email address to the payment source – and that this one piece of information was easily preventable by the activist – is an endorsement to me.

        • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Bitcoin is not anonymous. If you went with Bitcoin, they could trace all the transactions from the time it was minted. If they can get back to a known address, they can very likely trace it forward to you.

          On this list of payment methods, mailed cash is probably the most anonymous. They may theoretically be able to trace it back to your general region, but it would be difficult.

          • exaybachae@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            You can launder Bitcoin, and you can use unaffiliated bitcoin wallets.

            I have a couple wallets that I’ve only ever accessed with VPN, and I can buy anonymous coins on one, transfer anonymously to the other, then swap for another type of coin and spend from there.

            There are some gas fees and conversion costs, but vs jail I’d happily pay them.

            • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              You can launder, but the nature of the block chain is that all transactions are public and permanent. If your laundry service is compromised two years from now, the transaction you conduct today is also compromised.

        • Zidane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          14 hours ago

          arson, vandalism and doxing

          Wiki guy doesn’t believe in the Oxford comma, you disgust me

        • amniotic druid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Between the CEO using the official social account to celebrate Trump’s re-election, their hard and unwanted pivot to being all about AI, and now knowing that there’s really nothing stopping them from handing over my info to the FBI anyway, I’m not really struggling to find a reason tbh

          • oktux
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            17 hours ago

            CEO using the official social account to celebrate Trump’s re-election

            The tweet, from Dec. 2024, was celebrating that Trump nominated Gail Slater. It wasn’t celebrating Trump’s reelection, unless you know of some other tweet?

            https://x.com/andyyen/status/1864436449942110660

            • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              edit-2
              16 hours ago

              I mean… There’s a lot more in that tweet than just celebrating a specific nomination. You seem to be specifically ignoring the majority of the post for whatever reason.

              Great pick by @realDonaldTrump. 10 years ago, Republicans were the party of big business and Dems stood for the little guys, but today the tables have completely turned. People forget that the current antitrust actions against Big Tech were started under the first Trump admin.

              One of the big issues the tweet specifically mentions is a fucking lie. Neither major party gives a shit about the little guys anymore. And the Trump admin most definitely has not been a supporter of antitrust actions against big tech, unless you consider political attacks as antitrust.

              It definitely reads as an attempt to suck Trump’s dick as opposed to just agreeing with a decision.

              • oktux
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 hours ago

                I mean… There’s a lot more in that tweet than just celebrating a specific nomination. You seem to be specifically ignoring the majority of the post for whatever reason.

                I wasn’t sharing my opinion on the CEO’s post as a whole, just correcting the misinformation that PP_BOY_ posted.

                I provided a link to the CEO’s post so anyone (like you) could get the full context.

                For me, there’s a huge difference between supporting Trump’s reelection and supporting the nomination of someone who the CEO believes (even incorrectly) will promote antitrust regulation.

                For what it’s worth, I agree with you that both parties have in many ways prioritized the interests of big tech over the citizens they’re supposed to serve. Moreover, I believe Democrats have been much better champions of things that favor consumers, such as Net Neutrality. Trump’s administration gutted the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) for heaven’s sake.

                Obviously, I disagree with the CEO’s take in his tweet. But that’s no reason to allow misinformation to spread. I’d much rather everyone see the tweet and form their own opinions.

      • amniotic druid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Canceling my subscription tonight. All their apps were neat conveniences for me, but I’ll live without it. I’ve fortunately got cold copies of all my files on Drive already, but this is awful to see

        • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Yeah I don’t have the time to do that right now, but it’s mullvad and time to learn self-hosting for me.

          • amniotic druid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            19 hours ago

            I’ve been using Mullvad even with Proton VPN the whole time, anyway. It’s a great provider. Also need to learn how to self host

            • obious@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              18 hours ago

              I’ve gone down this rabbit hole, and it’s just not possible to host your own email without getting filtered out and having a lot of non-delivered emails from your address. It improves over time if you have a static email and IP, but it will never be zero failure.