• village604@adultswim.fan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      I knew a guy in college that kept getting new credit cards to pay off other credit cards he had maxed out. I wonder what his credit looks like now.

      • spicy pancake@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        that’s me, been trapped in that cycle since I had to pay several months’ rent with credit card during covid

        aside from some dings due to high credit usage, my score is good. mainly because i have a shit load of cards i opened years ago, so my average account age is high.

        I’m not a particularly responsible spender and have a shit ton of debt, but since I make the CC companies a bunch of money by paying balance transfer fees all the time, I’m profitable. So my score is high.

        What a stupid world

  • Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    bro. Fucking – Think about it. Klarna pay in 3 installments divide the cost by 3 and take payments monthly. Month A, you pay one third. Month B you pay one third of months A and B. By month C onwards you’re consistently paying three thirds or 100% of the rent. You’d only defer yourself the value of one month’s rent over the span of two months. Pointless.

    • cdf12345@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      73
      ·
      3 days ago

      That’s how fucked our economy is. There is a significant number of people so close to the edge that buying an extra 10 days before eviction is the final gasp before becoming homeless.

      • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yes. Previously the alternative was payday loans, which charged exorbitant interest rates.

        People have tried to ban these sorts of predatory loan businesses before but it usually forces people into the hands of organized crime loan sharks who charge even more exorbitant interest and exact brutal punishments on people who don’t pay up.

        • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          They should be illegal. The literal only difference between these ‘services’ and the mob is they typically don’t break your knees.

          But that’s not the only despicable thing about the mafia’s racket.

          These people squeeze the last blood from people who often become homeless anyhow; whereas if landlords had souls, many people could at least keep their housing and not be so vulnerable to predators.

      • bstix@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        No, but there are fees for late payments and other special situations.

        Their main income is from the transaction fees that they charge the merchants.

        The idea is that people who don’t have money can spend money and create a transaction fee on a sale that wouldn’t otherwise have happened if they didn’t lend the money. That way it’s the same as a credit card that you only pay monthly.

        The difference is that the payments can be split, so that the customers can … uh … utilize their entire credit maximum every month…

        Needless to say, this kind of credit maximum optimization can end really badly for people who have unstable incomes. The same kind of people who might be tempted to use it.

        • Victor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Yeah, exactly. It’s very predatory.

          I don’t think I’m their intended customer demographic. 😅 I use it to keep a tight check on all my purchases. Recently started doing the monthly invoice thing as well, so neat and tidy. One payment every month, then rearrange money in our bank accounts as needed based on shared economy with the wife. Bish bash bosh.

        • Victor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          And where is that? 🤔

          Where I live there’s a bit of interest when you postpone your payments further than 30 days. Other than that, no interest. Just like a regular credit card.

  • istdaslol@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    125
    ·
    3 days ago

    People already put rent on their credit card to pay it off in chunks. This is just Klarna tapping in that market

    • yesman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      86
      ·
      3 days ago

      People already put rent on their credit card to pay it off in chunks. This is just Klarna tapping in that market

      People using CC to pay rent isn’t reassuring, it’s more alarming. Paying for housing on short-term, high-interest credit is financial insanity and implies profound dysfunction if not desperation.

      • istdaslol@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        3 days ago

        Well if you don’t pay they can evict you very fast. So if you need the money yesterday you have to accept 12%pa

        • Zorcron@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          3 days ago

          You get charged a 3% transaction fee for using a credit card, which more than wipes out the value of any points you might earn.

          Tap for spoiler

          (Excluding the Bilt card, which used to let you earn 1% on rent and they processed it like an ACH/bank debit, so no credit card fee. But they recently restructured their rewards and it’s not nearly as easy to profit now.)

          • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 days ago

            Not every card gets charged a 3% mine for example doesn’t. I get 3% back on rent, housing and insurance on my card. There’s no fees involved. So it’s just a flat 3% discount.

            Pay rent with card in the first, pay it off on the second when it posts.

              • socsa@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                It doesn’t exist. There is no credit card which gives 3% cash back on rent specifically. Op might be confused about some cards which give rewards for “housing expenses” which means like Home Depot and shit.

          • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            X1 used to give 3 points and my buddy’s rental house charged a 2 and change percent fee. He could only get full point values certain places so he’d save up all the points and that was his Christmas fund. He’d bank $600/yr ( about $500 real dollars from paying the transaction fee plus the extra hundred-ish bucks in points he’d get for free). They recently went to a 1.5 point model but kept the restrictions on where you could spend to get the full point value. Guess what card of his never gets used now.

    • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I tend to forget that salaries are paid weekly in the US. Then this makes at least somewhat sense.

        • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          3 days ago

          Well, I’m used to monthly, both for rent and for salaries. So biweekly is still strangely often to me.

          But thanks for correcting me.

          • RamRabbit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            3 days ago

            Monthly or biweekly are both common in the US for salaries. And biweekly being the most common for hourly. Really just depends on your employer.

            But, bills always come in monthly, which makes the monthly budgeting simple. A biweekly bill would fuck over a bunch of people as occasionally it would hit three times in a month.

            • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Really just depends on your employer.

              specifically, in statesia it depends on: the size of your employer (how many employees they have) and whether you have a union that has negotiated a specific pay term.

              source:am expert, i think it’s in publication 15B

      • Dave@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        But then why isn’t rent paid weekly?

        Where I live, weekly or fortnightly pay is more common than monthly, and rent is almost always paid weekly.

        • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          But then why isn’t rent paid weekly?

          rent is almost always paid weekly.

          Did you mean monthly in that last sentence?

          • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            3 days ago

            The first is referring to the US, the second to where Dave lives (I assume New Zealand).

          • Dave@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 days ago

            You said it makes sense that in the US people get paid weekly (and pay rent monthly) so having a service that lets you pay rent off each week makes sense.

            I’m asking why in the US people don’t pay rent weekly. Where I live it’s the most common way of doing it.

            • RamRabbit@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              I’m asking why in the US people don’t pay rent weekly. Where I live it’s the most common way of doing it.

              Basically all bills in the US come in monthly. Keeps the number of transfers, letters, and emails down. And as everything is on the same schedule, it works pretty well.

              A biweekly bill would fuck over a bunch of people as it would occasionally come in three times in a month; necessitating a larger amount of cash on hand to account for these months. (And people are, overall, really bad about having any cash on hand)

              Edit: Rejiggered the comment a bit

              Edit 2: People get paid in the US either monthly or biweekly.

              • Dave@lemmy.nz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                People get paid in the US either monthly or biweekly.

                Ah, this is different than the other comment implied. They said:

                I tend to forget that salaries are paid weekly in the US. Then this makes at least somewhat sense.

    • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      My credit card gives me 3% on rent. So I just put it on the card on the first, pay it off on the second. Give a 3% discount on rent every month. Lol

    • errer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      A ton of property management companies charge like 3-5% “convenience” charge for using a credit card, meaning even with cash back you lose some money.

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Given that those fees are typically meant to cover processing fees and credit cards typically offer rewards because they effectively give you a cut of the processing fee this would make sense.

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    Klarna is really pissing me off. I got a refund from a place, and they put that money into some kind of Klarna Wallet or whatever, by default, instead of in my bank account where the money originally came from.

    So I go to their stupid site, and select the option to refund to my bank account, and they are warning me this will take up to 7 days! For no other reason than they wanting my money in their account so im tied to their service.

    Stay the hell away from Klarna. Im doing that from now on.

    • SirQuack@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Stay the hell away from Klarna

      Definitely! Klarna is one of the few parties that won’t cooporate when a Dutch citizen gets government mandated debt settlement. All other debt agencies settle and freeze interests as the state takes control of the debtee’s finances but Klarna just stacks interests like there’s no tomorrow.

      The idea behind the scheme is to have the debtee get their personal affairs in order, while an agency (ngo-like) takes care and control of all finances. You get like 50 eur to spend each week but this is also for groceries and all other savings are either used to settle debts, pay rent and other subscriptions and most subscriptions are cancelled with contracts being voided left and right.

      It’s a very invasive, but very effective program. Klarna is, as a for-proft debt agency, not having any of it.

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        it’s insane that they don’t because sweden has basically the exact same program.

    • 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      wtf, how is that legal? if someone is obligated to pay you some refund, how can they send it to some other private business instead?

        • 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          all you had to do was reach second sentence of their comment and you wouldn’t have to assume.

            • 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              they put that money into some kind of Klarna Wallet or whatever, by default, instead of in my bank account where the money originally came from.

              • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Yes. That’s how things like that work. Similar to things like the playstore, or app store and such. Apple/Google/Klarna pays for the product, you pay Apple/Google/Klarna back for the product via whatever means, Mastercard, Visa etc that you attach to their store. If they don’t receive the money from you, your account goes into bad standing with Apple/Google/Klarna, not with whoever they bought the product from, because they received their payment. So if you put a stop on the payment from your bank, it will also put your account in bad standing as owing money for a product you “already received”. It’s a shit way to do things, having a middle person, but to avoid such… don’t buy things through a middleman.

                Want say “Paramount plus”, buy it from Paramount, not using another service who takes it out of your bank because you gave them permissions to upon using their service.

                Thousands of people run into issues because of things like this daily.

  • antimidas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 days ago

    Klarna 'bout to find out their business model doesn’t work as well in the US compared to the Nordic countries and EU, as

    1. People are already up to their neck in debt, putting Klarna to the back of the queue in case there’s a default
    2. Personal bankruptcy is a thing

    Especially the Northern Europe personal bankruptcy is really not a thing, fuck up your finances and you’re never going to see a penny you make (above what you strictly need to live) until everything has been paid back. Debt that is actively being collected also never expires.

    There’s a good reason Klarna’s been able to thrive in this environment – getting debt from banks is quite difficult and you have added security from the draconian collections process.

    In the US a company ignores credit scores at their own peril. The bankruptcy process is one of the few things that works better in the US than in e.g. my home country Finland.

      • antimidas@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Serves me right for assuming Germans had a similarly judgemental attitude to people who have ruined their finances. Thanks for the correction.

        Finns often have a very puritan attitude to debt (you should fear it like the devil), and in the common discussion it’s often attributed to the ethics of the Lutheran church. That’s at least partially the reason we still don’t have a real personal bankruptcy option. Somewhat surprising to me that a country that shares that value system could be that forgiving to people – I’m a bit envious even 😅

        Around here Klarna and other similar companies have long been seen as exploiting the fact that debt is really difficult to get through proper sources, and there’s a matching draconian bunch of collections agencies to support that business model. We’ve mainly been trying to tackle this by regulating the process of giving out loans, instead of giving people the necessary way out and thus giving the corporations an incentive to self-regulate.

        If bad credit is actually no longer possible to collect on, it ceases to be good business. Hats off to Germany for having a proper route out of predatory loans.

        • far_university1990@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I german but still hate debt. Why buy something pay off later? Why not just save up monthly then pay once? Same process, same result, 0 fee.

          • rumba@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            in general:

            The depressed poor person has a lack of dopamine and is completely apathetic to poor decision outcomes.

            here in specific:

            they’re using it for rent, living on the street for a few months to set up your next rent payment is a poor option.

            If you go to florid in the US there are PAYDAY loan shops ALL OVER THE PLACE. It’s the most bizarre thing. Interest rates are outrageous. Your check comes out, you can lose 13% of it to get it now… I suspect because drugs…

    • huppakee@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      People are already up to their neck in debt, putting Klarna to the back of the queue in case there’s a default

      People in debt (before there is professional help) end up paying the important things first (such as rent) and then choose to pay off the debt that is most within their reach. Klarna is much more likely to be a low amount compared to their creditors.

      It might be true their loans are more likely to be payed back while also they might have less to loose in case of a personal bankruptcy.

      But that aside, i have no clue on whether Klarna is making a smart move. But i assume they are because companies that are both evil and stupid don’t tend to come far.

      • PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Eh, I dunno about that last point. “Evil” is a pretty OP strategy if you have the stomach for it, usually leaves lots of room to survive doing dumb shit. And hot DAMN greed is good at convincing people to do dumb shit!

        On the one hand, don’t underestimate their cunning, I do agree with that. But on the other, I’ve never liked the “4D chess” assumptions some folks are so willing to make (not meaning you here), it’s unwise to overestimate it, too.

        • huppakee@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          “Evil” is a pretty OP strategy if you have the stomach for it

          I think they do have the stomach for it. And also smart enough to get away with conning people, to know how to not get in trouble with lawmakers, do that fine print just right etc. They act as if they are helping people by offering easy credit while they know they’re not earning money from people who can easily pay them back. They profit off the least capable to keep their finances in order, living of the weak and vulnerable like parasites do.

      • antimidas@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I’ll try to find some and link, but I’m not sure if there are good ones.

        Edit: couldn’t find one with quick googling. Guess I’ll have to write one when I have time.

  • rogsson@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    3 days ago

    Dystopian fucking timeline. Around every corner there seemingly waits billionaires waiting to fuck ppl over

  • Bongles@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Oh, by the way it’s not coming soon, I could do it right now on the portal I pay my rent on. It’s through Flex.