cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/47914524

  • Chinese media platform NetEase ran a Dec. 14 article urging Beijing to “prepare for the worst” if Russia fractures, arguing the Russian Far East’s 7 million square kilometers should not be “lost.”

  • The piece frames the region as a resource treasure for China and a burden for Moscow, then outlines an annexation by stealth” playbook: deepen investment, move people and money in, lock long contracts, promote pro-China local elites, introduce the yuan, and finance infrastructure with loans that create dependence.

  • It also cites “unequal treaties” from 1858–1860 to revive territorial claims as Russian security officials quietly warn Beijing is encroaching.

Archived

[…]

For more than 25 years, the great fear of many Russian national security strategists has been the increasing vulnerability Moscow faces vis-à-vis the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nowhere is that anxiety more pronounced than in the Russian Far East and Pacific coast regions.

[…]

That region is home to a number of strategic industries, including the massive Komsomolsk-na-Amure aviation production plant that manufactures the most advanced Sukhoi fighter aircraft, most notably the Su-35 and Su-57.

The PRC has already purchased the first of those two models. The second is loaded with technologies and on-board systems that Beijing would like to have.

Therefore, Moscow’s “China nightmare” has been, for years, that as Russia’s population in the East continues to decline and its economic prowess declines, the combined weakness could prompt the PRC to begin seizing some of the most valuable areas of that territory. According to a classified document leaked from the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) earlier this year, even Russian President Vladimir Putin fears that Beijing is already “trying to encroach” on this territory.

[…]

[Russia’s] nightmare is now coming close to becoming a reality—a very bad daydream.

On December 14, NetEase, one of China’s largest media platforms and officially listed with hundreds of millions of users, published an article with a headline that telegraphed intentions Russia has long feared. “China Must Prepare for the Worst: If Russia Collapses, This 7 Million Square Kilometer Territory Must Not Be Lost” is the title of the Chinese-language article.

The subject, of course, is Russia’s Far East. The irony is that the PRC is the very nation that Putin so defiantly “pivoted” to in the wake of Western sanctions after his invasion of Ukraine.

[…]

And it is that same nation he was counting on to evade Western sanctions that is now talking openly about beginning to devour one of the most strategically important regions that he rules over.

The Chinese authors do not even attempt to clothe Beijing’s ambitions in any diplomatic or circuitous language. The Far East is like a “chicken rib” for Russia, they write, an enormous but useless region, because “there’s no money for development, no people, and the war in the west is draining the last resources.”

For China, however, it’s a “treasure”—teeming with gold, diamonds, oil, gas, and timber. In other words, everything Beijing desperately needs.

[…]

The Chinese language article reads:

“One should not attempt to seize it by force; this would lead to global encirclement, as happened with Crimea. The smart approach is to be more accommodating, continue investing money and human resources, sign long-term contracts, and support pro-Chinese forces in the region. Nominally independent, but practically dependent on Chinese support."

As a Russian commentator points out, this plan is not some conspiracy theory or wild speculation. It’s a direct quote from Chinese media. One step after another is spelled out: create economic dependence, introduce the Chinese currency (the yuan) as a local legal tender; build infrastructure, bind the locals to Beijing with loans (that are used to pay for the infrastructure), and wait for the “political landscape to change.”

[…]

The Chinese could also give the Russians lessons on historical grievances and how to play the victimization card. Like Putin in a Tucker Carlson interview, the article reaches back more than a century and a half to remind readers that, in 1858, Russia used the Treaty of Aigun to annex 600,000 square kilometers north of the Amur from a weakened and corrupt Qing Empire.

[…]

For China, these territories being part of Russia are the consequence of “unequal treaties”, the term that Beijing officially uses to describe these 19th-century agreements. In China’s eyes, the agreements are not binding, Russia still “owes” this territory back to the PRC, and the debt remains unpaid.

Chinese intent is clear. When Russia collapses from the strains caused by the Ukraine war, this issue will be dealt with.

[…]

Russia is bogged down in this war, write the authors, and now its GDP is “smaller than a single Chinese province,” and thanks to that war [in Ukraine], Russia now has fewer than “50,000 troops remaining in the Far East—essentially an empty shell”, as Chinese media openly writes.

[…]

  • plyth@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    prepare for the worst” if Russia fractures

    “If Russia fractures” is not the same as " a ‘Stealth Playbook’ To Carve Up Russia".

    Russia is run by a KGB officer and China is a socialist country that uses market economy. They will end up together. The fracturing of Russia is an attempt by the West to prevent that.

    However, in that worst case it is best for China to control as much as possible of the parts. However the West will also try everything to prevent that.

    • deHaga@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Doubt.

      Taking Outer Manchuria back from the weakened Russians would be a whole lot easier than taking Tauwan

      • plyth@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        China has gone all in on integrity of countries. Taiwan is China and of no business to the US. Their claim loses strength if they invade Russia and redraw borders.

        They also need Russia on their side or the US will use the remaining Russia to isolate or even conquer them.

        Finally their foreign policy with Vietnam and such relies on respecting other countries, no matter how weak.

        In other words, Manchuria is a trap.

        • lb_o@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          The only question is when They don’t need Russia on their side always

        • deHaga@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          Outer Manchuria is Chinese though. Russia took it from them in 1860 via unfair treaties.

          Taking Taiwan would involve Gaza x10 levels of destruction.

  • 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    I love it when wankies bitch and moan about a websites’ credibility and bias when they’re critical of the west.

    But if it’s critical of the China, Russia, and the like they gather around likes cops at a black persons house circle jerking whos going to shoot him first.

    “Fuck the facts, stop resisting.”

    The website is just 4 year old and has the members of the heritage foundation.

    https://web.archive.org/web/20251219213119/https://www.19fortyfive.com/meet-the-team/

    So yea, fuck you hypocrites.

  • witty_username@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Of course they do. At the very least they want Manchuria back. When Russia loses (probably by economic collapse), it will be carved up similarly to Germany after ww2

    • Makhno@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Doubtful it will be as binary as west and east Germany. Russia is made up of several separate countries with their own identities. It will be much more chaotic in my lay-man’s opinion. Hopefully some of those countries are able to create their own blocs in the event that Moscow falls

    • P00ptart@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      You cant even imagine the scenarios the US has plans for. “What if Morocco develops synthetic life and teleportation and starts using that tech to invade the Philippines?”

      • ByteOnBikes@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Pretty much.

        “What if American citizens decide to unite against billionaires?”

        “What if Black Americans decide they want to be treated equally?”

        • P00ptart@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          “what if Atlantis is real and has been biding their time to usurp the land people?”

  • Glytch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    15 hours ago

    This is essentially the plot of Tom Clancy’s The Bear and The Dragon. Bad book, don’t recommend it.

    • uncouple9831@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      You already said it was a Tom Clancy book, you don’t need to keep warning us off.

  • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    21 hours ago

    It would be ironic if what stops Russia’s invasion war in Europe is the risk of Chinese annexation of Eastern Russia.

    • ICCrawler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      They absolutely do, they just do other stuff, too.

      The company provides online services with content, community, communications, and commerce. It operates a news website at news.163.com and an associated app.[5][6] NetEase has an on-demand music-streaming service (NetEase Cloud Music). Video games the company has developed include, Fantasy Westward Journey, Tianxia III, Heroes of Tang Dynasty Zero, Ghost II, Marvel Rivals, and Destiny: Rising. NetEase operates the Chinese version of Blizzard Entertainment games, such as World of Warcraft, StarCraft II, and Overwatch. It also created an Android emulator for PC, called MuMu Player.[7] The company also owns multiple pig farms.[8] In 2023, the company revenue was US$14.6 billion.[9]

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NetEase