• @foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      1261 year ago

      Yeah this post is nearly upsettingly ignorant.

      Cloudflare is just about the only big internet company out there objectively doing good things for the Internet.

      • @danwardvs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        411 year ago

        This seems like saying road construction makes driving objectively worse or security guards make a stadium venue objectively worse.

      • spacesweedkid27
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        Maybe their point is just privatisation or something.

        For example a dns provider like cloudfare just could artificially make latency costs for servers that don’t agree with something cloudfare does bigger, which would result in them being less likely to be displayed in a search result because a search engine would have IP adresses faster from other servers. This obviously depends on if a search engine makes dns requests or just provides hostnames for the end user.

      • @planish@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        -11 year ago

        Right now.

        But everybody is also moving into their castle. Many for free.

        They are not allowed to let people do that unless they have an argument that, somehow, this makes money for the owners of Cloudflare. Maybe that’s in the form of good publicity. Maybe they’re hoping to set up some tollbooths at the castle gate, once enough people are inside and the other options have withered for lack of customers.

        • @foggy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          They have existed for over a decade wtf are you on about. They’re publicly traded and doing very well.

          This is more nonsense in a thread full of nonsense.

          • @planish@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            That suggests they’re less likely to try to frantically monitize in a way that risks killing their brand’s reputation. Maybe they’ll stay nice indefinitely.

            • BoscoBear
              link
              110 months ago

              Anyone providing services for a profit could pull a Unity at anytime. Still, I think you need more for the “slippery slope” argument.

    • KSP Atlas
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      I dont like monopolies, but a world without cloud flare would go down constantly just because a few script kiddies decided to ddos something

    • @kucing@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Also made my company I worked for saved ton of money, instead of using other usage-based CDN since we got some ddos for the past year.

      The CF Pages and their video encoding platform also ok and easy to use.

    • @RickyRigatoni@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      -731 year ago

      My negative experiences as an end user take priority over any positive experience told to me by a third party in a usage case that doesn’t apply to me.

      • Daniel
        link
        fedilink
        English
        511 year ago

        Most of the time that a site is using Cloudflare you’ve likely not noticed and it has improved your experience.

        • taanegl
          link
          fedilink
          5
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You’re all circle jerking around the problem. Proxy DNS and CDN’s should be decentralised into standard protocols and not centralised into one company, for what should be obvious reasons (privacy being one of them).

          I use CloudFlare on my websites and I feel like I don’t have a choice. The fact that it’s free to use proxy DNS is the kicker here, and the big selling point behind the DDoS protections. But the milliseconds CF DNS and page caching shave off page loads is also dangerous, because now it becomes mandatory if your websites are actually competing against someone else.

          Again: this is a single entity, a single point of failure and in effect a monopoly. We don’t just get to use it, we have to use it.

          Of course one can’t complain unless one has made an effort to do something about it, like I dunno, make a national version of CloudFlare?

          Mwahahahaha! Didn’t like that one, did you?!? Soon that will be mandatory and departments that investigate will honeypot your ass when they need a some justification for taking your in for a little private interrogation… wait, no, GO BACK!!

          Okay, so protocols. Hard as fuck, static as hell. Yes? But, decentralised. Si? DNS proxying and content caches are staples of the modern internet. Content go quick, content go real quick ya. All we need to do is figure out a way to facilitate those things without having to rely on a single company, government body or even access to the many nodes that comprise the internet.

          We used to write spec, damnit! We must return to the source. I have been some schmuck on the internet and this was my TL;DR.

          • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            I don’t like how you say it, but what you say is true. Truth is hard to hear, sometimes.

      • Scrubbles
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        Your experience as an end user is only available because cloudflare exists. That’s why your end user opinion doesn’t matter, because bad actors are constantly trying to ruin the internet and cloudflare is the gatekeeper. As a server owner I need security at the door to keep our illegal activity. Your opinion of “I don’t like security at the door” is dually noted and immediately thrown away.

        • @RickyRigatoni@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          -41 year ago

          “You only know about the bad thing because the bad thing exists” what a compelling argument. Did you know water makes things wet because it’s wet?

      • @foggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        Yes, speed limits are dumb it affect me personally idc how it benefits the rest of us. Great philosophy.

    • Greyscale
      link
      English
      481 year ago

      Single point of failure for the whole internet.

      • @foggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        381 year ago

        Only because no one does what they do as well as they do it.

        If they had competition, that wouldn’t be the case. Sadly, there are very few other good guys out there…

          • @foggy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            101 year ago

            There exists competition, they’ve just been doing it consistently well at a large scale for awhile.

            They’ve done nothing to prevent competition, because they’re legit AF. The competition just hasn’t put a dent in their market share because they’re excellent at what they do.

        • Greyscale
          link
          English
          61 year ago

          Their management control plane absolutely is a single point of failure.

        • @kautau@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          131 year ago

          Agreed, and I would say what cloudflare does for the internet (their work on the IETF, generally letting small sites stay alive without needing an SRE to worry about DDoS attacks, etc) outweighs the general negative possibility of them being a potential single point of failure

        • @30p87@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          71 year ago

          Well the admin of a site could opt out of using cloudflare for the time being, a user could do literally nothing. Errors in Cloudflare can easily take down their servers and therefore the CDN and access to like 20% of websites. And Bugs in Cloudflare can even leak user data.

          So cloudflare can grant DDOS Protection, CDNs and other exploiting protection, but can take down large parts of everything, temporarily or permanently.

        • Scrubbles
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Shhhh you can’t just be reasonable here. This guy watched a YouTube video, he knows what he’s talking about

          If cloudflare decided not to host my server I would have a bit of downtime, a couple of hours, but I’d be up again on someone else’s CDN tomorrow. I don’t think OP understands the role of cloudflare at all.

    • The Cuuuuube
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      There are benefits and costs. Cloudflare makes it easy to maintain high uptime as a small site sysadmin at the cost of free DDoS protection isn’t actually free. Cloudflare turns all users of websites that employ it into the products of surveillance capitalism

    • @RickyRigatoni@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      -531 year ago

      Provides a single point of failure for a large portion of the internet that nobody else has any control over?

      • Using cloudflare is more reliable than using your own stuff which is still an option that nobody chooses anymore because it’s better to choose cloudflare or something similar.

        I’m going to go ahead and assume you don’t work with internet security in any way, have no experience in web development, and have never attempted to provide web application services to more people than you can count on your fingers, but if you had, cloudflare is mana from heaven.

        • Scrubbles
          link
          fedilink
          English
          71 year ago

          Well no but I heard other people say it’s bad and give some half reasons why. Why do I need to understand the tech if I just want to be mad about it? /s

          Fr though cloudflare is a giant, but they give some hardcore protections to little guys like me. If they ever were bad to me I’d switch to akamai or something. Plus if we’re going to talk about monopolizing the web let’s talk about Google, Azure, and AWS.

      • taanegl
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        Oh no, centralising DNS and CDN traffic which are critical for the web and the internet into a single company is a bad idea?! Who knew!?!

  • @InvaderDJ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    441 year ago

    Honestly, I don’t know how any end user who doesn’t understand IT and wasn’t around before services like Cloudflare were available can say this. They objectively don’t have the information or experience to make the claim.

  • Izzy
    link
    fedilink
    301 year ago

    Cloudflare is having some weird issues with Discord this morning.

    • @gencha@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      I’d claim it’s the other way around until proven otherwise. Configuring the edge is not for everyone

  • Krafting
    link
    fedilink
    151 year ago

    I want to upvote and downvote this post… it’s so controversial

  • kubica
    link
    fedilink
    151 year ago

    “So you solved the catcha, ok, we don’t care anyway.”

  • Destide
    link
    fedilink
    English
    101 year ago

    Literally trying to figure out if Cloudflare or tailscale would be the best way to go. The memes have spoken

        • @lukas3651@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          If you have the skills for setting it up, than that’s the best way to deploy tailscale, the true zero trust method, just keep it in house.

    • @RickyRigatoni@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      -141 year ago

      Don’t use memes to make decisions I’m just mad I can’t use the discord app on my desktop, can’t download manga from nhentai without jumping through hoops anymore, and have to solve 5 captchas in a row when I use a vpn which is all the time.

  • @soulfirethewolf@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    81 year ago

    I really think that on the list of worst single points of failure, DNS is not one of them. Given how easy it is to actually switch. And given that cloudflare outages are not nearly as common, The times they do happen usually are only for half an hour or so.