cultural reviewer and dabbler in stylistic premonitions

  • 1.31K Posts
  • 1.72K Comments
Joined 5 年前
cake
Cake day: 2022年1月17日

help-circle















  • Arthur Besse@lemmy.mlOPMtoMemes@lemmy.mlIEEE 754
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    13 天前

    And other times 0.1 + 0.2 = 0.3000004

    0.1 + 0.2 != 0.3000004

    You’re off by 0.000000399999999955991114575226674787700176239013671875

    (0.1 + 0.2 is actually 0.3000000000000000444089209850062616169452667236328125)

    (And 0.1 is actually 0.1000000000000000055511151231257827021181583404541015625, and so on. People unfamiliar with IEEE 754 may be surprised by the output of python -c 'print("%.60f" % 0.1)')























  • New York State not New York City.

    I don’t know why Mamdani is pictured

    the text in this image is also just flat-out wrong: the proposed legislation does not actually “ban AI from answering questions” on these subjects at all, as this post claims it does.

    https://www.nysenate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2026/kristen-gonzalez/ny-state-senator-kristen-gonzalez-her-bill-address-ai explains that her bill is strictly about impersonating licensed professionals:

    We have documented instances of AI chatbots providing false medical license numbers to users and documented cases of real harm from AI chatbots providing misinformation. This is what my common-sense legislation addresses—protecting users from misinformation, scams, and fraud. This legislation does not prohibit a user from asking a chatbot questions or receiving general information and advice, as long as the chatbot is not presenting that information as a licensed professional. It would also not prohibit licensed professionals from consulting AI technology in the course of their work.