Plebbit is pure peer-to-peer social media protocol, it has no central servers, no global admins, and no way shut down communities-meaning true censorship resistance.
Unlike federated platforms, like lemmy and Mastedon, there are no instances or servers to rely on
this project was created due to wanting to give control of communication and data back to the people.
Plebbit only hosts text. Images from google and other sites can be linked/embedded in posts. This fixes the issue of hosting any nefarious content.
ENS domain are used to name communities.
Plebbit currently offers different UIs. Old reddit UI and new reddit, 4chan, and have a Blog. Plebbit intend to have an app, internet archive, wiki and twitter and Lemmy UI . Choice is important. The backend/communities are shared across clients.
anyone can contribute, build their own client, and shape the ecosystem
Important Links :
Home
App
https://plebbit.com/home#cb2a9c90-6f09-44b2-be03-75f543f9f5aa
FAQ
https://github.com/plebbit/whitepaper/blob/master/FAQ.md
Whitepapers
https://github.com/plebbit/whitepaper
https://github.com/plebbit/whitepaper/discussions/2
Github
https://github.com/plebbit/plebbit-react
https://github.com/plebbit/plebbit-react/releases
i don’t trust any messenger system that uses the word “serverless”. such a word is misleading, at best, and a scam more likely.
no global admins, and no way shut down communities-meaning true censorship resistance.
“True censorship resistance” is not a desirable property. No normal user wants to deal with moderation. You need to have a structure for delegating moderation and such tasks to other people.
Says who? Moderate your damn self, wannabe. Better yet, GTFO and don’t touch this horror show. You might break a pinky.
No moderation seems like a recipe for disaster
I was there for the early days of Voat, which was an earlier version of a Reddit clone. Those first few months were nice, but it quickly devolved into a hate-filled N*zi safe haven.
Fediverse has an early version of a bot problem, which is ubiquitous in all social media these days (thanks to state actors and also corpos that want you to think/feel a certain way). idk how the fediverse is handling the bot problem, but for now it seems to be less noticeable here than other places.
If the platform is truly “free speech” without any moderation, then it will quickly devolve into worse than 4chan.
Voat is gone now, which is a good thing, but if you have an programming background you can use an LLM to study the way it self-destructed by looking at the archive.org snippets. See how it quickly became theDonald but worse.
That is what will happen to this un-moderated decentralized social media protocol.
Well from their site
Moderation
Since there are no global admins, the administrative control of a subplebbit rests solely with its creator. No one else can moderate content or accounts unless the subplebbit creator grants them permission.
So, it’s not that theirs no moderation. It’s just “subplebbit” creator/delegates controlled as there is no over arching site wide company able to moderate it on the whole.
It will mean, as a user, you’ll have to be liberal with removing subplebbits from your own feed though. I’m sure there will be some… not so pleasant subplebbits appearing.
This fixes the issue of hosting any nefarious content.
NSFW = Nefarious content
PD94bWwgdmVyc2lvbj0iMS4wIiBzdGFuZGFsb25lPSJubyI/Pgo8IURPQ1RZUEUgc3ZnIFBVQkxJ QyAiLS8vVzNDLy9EVEQgU1ZHIDIwMDEwOTA0Ly9FTiIKICJodHRwOi8vd3d3LnczLm9yZy9UUi8y MDAxL1JFQy1TVkctMjAwMTA5MDQvRFREL3N2ZzEwLmR0ZCI+CjxzdmcgdmVyc2lvbj0iMS4wIiB4 bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciCiB3aWR0aD0iNjQwLjAwMDAwMHB0IiBo ZWlnaHQ9IjEyODAuMDAwMDAwcHQiIHZpZXdCb3g9IjAgMCA2NDAuMDAwMDAwIDEyODAuMDAwMDAw IgogcHJlc2VydmVBc3BlY3RSYXRpbz0ieE1pZFlNaWQgbWVldCI+CjxtZXRhZGF0YT4KQ3JlYXRl ZCBieSBwb3RyYWNlIDEuMTUsIHdyaXR0ZW4gYnkgUGV0ZXIgU2VsaW5nZXIgMjAwMS0yMDE3Cjwv bWV0YWRhdGE+CjxnIHRyYW5zZm9ybT0idHJhbnNsYXRlKDAuMDAwMDAwLDEyODAuMDAwMDAwKSBz Y2FsZSgwLjEwMDAwMCwtMC4xMDAwMDApIgpmaWxsPSIjMDAwMDAwIiBzdHJva2U9Im5vbmUiPgo8 cGF0aCBkPSJNMjQxNyAxMjc4OSBjLTg1IC0yMCAtMTcyIC05MCAtMjAyIC0xNjMgLTExIC0yNSAt MjMgLTM0IC01OCAtNDMKLTY5IC0xOSAtMTI2IC02OSAtMTY0IC0xNDMgLTIzNiAtNDY0IC0zMjUg LTY5MiAtNDAzIC0xMDMwIC0xMiAtNTIgLTQwIC0xNjcKLTYzIC0yNTUgLTIyIC04OCAtNDEgLTE4 MiAtNDIgLTIxMCAtMSAtMjcgLTE0IC04OCAtMjkgLTEzNCAtMjQgLTc2IC0yNyAtMTE4Ci02IC04 MSAzMSA1NCAxMDQgMTQyIDEyOCAxNTQgNjMgMzMgODUgLTIzIDExNyAtMjg5IDQwIC0zMzQgOTgg LTUwMiAyMDUgLTU5OAo0NCAtNDAgMTEwIC03NiAxMTAgLTYxIDAgMyAtMTYgMjQgLTM1IDQ3IC0y NSAyOSAtMzUgNTAgLTM1IDc0IDAgMzcgLTI0IDkzCi00MCA5MyAtNSAwIC0xMiAxMSAtMTYgMjQg LTYgMjcgMTMgNzIgNDUgMTAwIDEyIDExIDIxIDMwIDIxIDQzIDAgMTcgNSAyMyAxOAoyMSAxMyAt MiAxOSA5IDI5IDUyIDYgMzAgMTIgODEgMTIgMTEzIDEgNTEgMTEgNzEgMjUgNDkgMyAtNSAtMiAt NDYgLTExIC05MwotMjEgLTExNiAtMjEgLTM1NyAxIC00NzkgOSAtNTIgMTkgLTExMCAyMiAtMTI3 IDMgLTE4IDggLTMzIDEzIC0zMyAxOCAwIDQ2CjMwIDU3IDYxIGwxMiAzNCA3IC0zMiBjNSAtMjIg MTMgLTMzIDI1IC0zMyAxMyAwIDE5IC0xMSAyNCAtNDYgMyAtMjYgNiAtMzA1CjYgLTYyMCBsMCAt NTc0IC0yOSAtMTA3IGMtMTcgLTYwIC01OSAtMjE1IC05NSAtMzQ1IC05MyAtMzM5IC0xNTYgLTY3 OCAtMTU2Ci04NDIgMCAtMjcgLTQ3IC0yNzUgLTEwNSAtNTUyIGwtMTA1IC01MDQgLTExNCAtMjA4 IGMtNjIgLTExNSAtMTE2IC0yMTcgLTEyMAotMjI4IC01IC0xNiA0IC0yOCAzNiAtNTQgMjQgLTE5 IDQ3IC00MSA1MiAtNDkgNSAtOSAzMSAtMzcgNTcgLTYzIDM2IC0zNSA1NwotNDggNzggLTQ4IDE3 IDAgMzMgNSAzNiAxMSA1IDYgMTMgMyAyMiAtMTAgMjIgLTMzIDQ1IC00MSA4OCAtMzEgMzAgNyA0 MyA1CjU2IC02IDE4IC0xNiA0NCAtMTAgNTMgMTIgOCAyMSAyNiA3IDI2IC0xOSAtMSAtMzYgLTMz IC02NCAtMTE2IC0xMDMgLTkyIC00MgotMTc4IC02NCAtMzY0IC05NCAtMTUxIC0yNSAtMjI3IC00 OSAtMjU3IC04MyAtNTEgLTU3IC0xNTAgLTM0MyAtMTk2IC01NjcKLTQ0IC0yMTMgLTQ0IC0yMDMg LTEgLTIzOCBsMzcgLTMxIDMwIDIyIGMyMiAxNiAzMSAxOSAzNCA5IDcgLTIwIDMzIC00MiA0OQot NDIgMTYgMCA0OCA0NCAxMDcgMTQ5IGw0MiA3NCAxMTAgNDcgYzc5IDM0IDEzMCA0OSAxODAgNTQg MzkgNCAxNTMgMTcgMjU1CjI4IDEzNiAxNiAyNDQgMjIgNDA1IDIyIDE5NyAwIDIzMCAtMiAzMTQg LTIzIDUyIC0xMyAxMjQgLTM1IDE2MCAtNTAgbDY2IC0yNgo4IC0xNjEgYzggLTE1MiA3IC0xNjcg LTE3IC0yNzUgLTc5IC0zNTYgLTgxIC01OTIgLTYgLTExODQgMjEgLTE3MCA0MSAtMzM5CjQ1IC0z NzUgMTEgLTExMSAyNSAtMTg2IDg1IC00NjAgMzMgLTE0NiA2NCAtMzA1IDcxIC0zNTQgMTMgLTk5 IDYgLTIxMyAtMTYKLTI3NSAtMTIgLTM1IC0xMSAtNTQgNiAtMTU4IDIxIC0xMzIgMjQgLTIyOCA4 IC0yNzAgLTYgLTE2IC0xMCAtOTcgLTEwIC0xOTMKMSAtMTY5IC0yNiAtMzg0IC02NSAtNTIwIC0z MyAtMTE3IDMgLTI0OSA5MSAtMzM1IDg1IC04MiAyNjggLTE1NCAzOTIgLTE1NQo2OSAwIDg5IDE1 IDExOCA4OSA3OSAxOTYgOTEgMjk3IDUyIDQzNiAtNDQgMTU3IC03NiAzMzYgLTg4IDQ5MCAtNiA4 MyAtMjIKMjIxIC0zNSAzMDggLTEzIDg3IC0yNCAxODAgLTI0IDIwNiAwIDI2IC05IDgzIC0yMCAx MjcgLTQ0IDE3MSAtNTMgMjU4IC00MQozODMgNiA2NCAxNSAxODQgMjEgMjY2IDYgODMgMjcgMjc0 IDQ2IDQyNSA0NiAzNTUgNTQgNTc1IDI5IDc4MCAtMTEgODYgLTE5CjIxNSAtMTkgMzE1IDAgMTUx IDMgMTg5IDMzIDM0NSAxOCA5NiAzNCAxNzYgMzYgMTc4IDIgMiA3NCAtMzUgMTYyIC04MSAxODAK LTk2IDczMCAtMzg2IDgxMyAtNDI5IDkzIC00NyAxNzcgLTY4IDMyMSAtODAgbDEzNiAtMTEgOTUg NDYgYzEwNCA1MCAxNzkgMTE0CjIyMSAxODcgNzYgMTMyIDg1IDM3OSAyNiA3MTYgLTk2IDU1NSAt MTYyIDg0NCAtMjYwIDExMzcgLTUwIDE1MSAtMTUwIDM4OAotMTc3IDQyMCAtMjMgMjYgLTEwIDI5 IDMzIDcgNTEgLTI2IDkyIC0yNiAxMDAgMCA1IDE2IDEwIDE4IDMzIDkgMjEgLTggMjkgLTcKMzkg NyA3IDEwIDEzIDIzIDEzIDI5IDAgNiAtMjggNDkgLTYyIDk2IC00OSA2NyAtNjUgOTggLTc5IDE1 NCAtOSAzOSAtMTUgNzMKLTEyIDc4IDEwIDE2IDIxIDUgMjcgLTI4IDkgLTQ2IDkzIC0yMTMgMTIz IC0yNDIgMTkgLTIwIDI2IC0yMiA0NCAtMTIgMTkgMTAKMjEgMTcgMTUgNTcgLTMgMjUgLTI0IDEw MCAtNDUgMTY2IGwtMzkgMTIxIDUgMjM1IGM0IDE2NCAyIDI2NyAtOCAzNDAgLTIxCjE2OSAtMTkg MTg1IDU0IDQzNCAxMjggNDM2IDIwNyA3ODcgMjQ4IDExMTEgMTEgODggMjcgMTg1IDM1IDIxNSAx OSA3NSAxOAoxMjYgLTExIDM0MSAtMjUgMTkyIC0xNDkgODU2IC0yMTEgMTEyOSAtNzEgMzEzIC0x NTQgNTg5IC0yMTYgNzE3IC00MiA4NiAtODAKMTI3IC0xNDQgMTU5IC01NCAyNiAtNTcgMjcgLTE4 NyAyMCAtMTM0IC03IC0xNzUgLTE0IC0zNzQgLTU5IC02MiAtMTUgLTE1MwotMjkgLTIwMiAtMzMg bC05MCAtNyAyNCA2OSBjMTQgMzggMjUgODQgMjUgMTAyIDAgNDIgLTMwIDcyIC03NCA3MiAtMTgg MCAtNTQKMyAtODAgNiAtNDQgNiAtNDYgOCAtMzAgMjUgMTEgMTMgMTUgMjggMTEgNDkgLTUgMjQg LTMgMzAgMTEgMzAgMjggMCA4MSAzNwoxMDIgNzIgMTQgMjMgMjAgNDcgMTggNzcgLTMgNDMgLTQg NDQgLTUzIDYzIC00MSAxNiAtNTMgMjYgLTY3IDU4IC0xNSAzNSAtMjAKNDAgLTUwIDQwIC0zNiAw IC0xMDggLTQwIC0xNDIgLTc4IC0xMSAtMTIgLTIyIC0yMiAtMjYgLTIyIC0zIDAgLTEyIDIyIC0y MAo0OSAtMTMgNDcgLTE1IDQ5IC02NCA2MyBsLTUxIDEzIC0zIDUwIGMtMiAzMSAtOSA1MyAtMTgg NTggLTggNSAtMzEgNDAgLTUwCjgwIC00NiA4OSAtMTExIDE5MCAtMTY1IDI1MSAtNDggNTQgLTI1 NCAyMjEgLTMxOSAyNTggLTE1NyA4OSAtMzg2IDEzNyAtNTEzCjEwN3ogbTU0MSAtMzM5NyBjMjQg LTE5IDYzIC02NCA4NyAtMTAxIDIzIC0zNiA3MSAtMTExIDEwNyAtMTY2IDM1IC01NSA3OQotMTE0 IDk3IC0xMzIgMzcgLTM4IDU1IC03OCA3NyAtMTcwIDIwIC04NyAxOSAtMTk3IC0yIC0yNTkgLTIw IC02MCAtNDIgLTkxCi0xNzIgLTI0MCAtMTIwIC0xMzcgLTIzNSAtMjg3IC0yNzYgLTM1OSAtMTYg LTI3IC03MSAtMTA1IC0xMjMgLTE3MiAtNzUgLTk4Ci0xMDIgLTE0MyAtMTMzIC0yMjAgLTc1IC0x ODggLTk2IC0zMTIgLTEwNiAtNjEzIC0xMCAtMzA1IDM3IC02NDYgMTkyIC0xMzc5CjM1IC0xNjgg NjMgLTMwOSA2MiAtMzEzIC0yIC01IC00NSAxOCAtOTYgNDkgLTg0IDUzIC05MyA2MiAtMTAzIDk4 IC0zMiAxMzEKLTkyIDIzOCAtMTU4IDI4MiAtNTggMzkgLTEwNCA0NiAtMjU4IDQwIC0xMzEgLTYg LTE0MyAtNSAtMTQzIDExIDAgOSAtMTQgNjIKLTMwIDExNyAtMzggMTI4IC0zOSAxOTUgLTQgMjc4 IDUzIDEyNSA2NiAxNzUgODAgMzA0IDkgOTMgMjAgMTQ5IDM4IDE5MCAxMwozMiA1MiAxNDEgODYg MjQzIDUwIDE1MCA5MCAyNDMgMjEyIDQ5MCAyNDkgNTA2IDI1NSA1MjggMzA4IDExMTUgNSA2NiAy NiAyMjgKNDUgMzYwIDQwIDI3NCA1NSA0MzAgNTUgNTYzIGwwIDkzIDU4IC0zNyBjMzEgLTIwIDc2 IC01MiAxMDAgLTcyeiBtNzE2IC0yOTg3CmMzMyAtNTAgMzggLTY3IDU3IC0xOTcgMzMgLTIzMiA3 NCAtMzg1IDE0NyAtNTUzIDQ4IC0xMTEgMzExIC03NjUgMzA3IC03NjUKLTEgMCAtNTkgMjcgLTEy NyA2MCAtMTQyIDY5IC0yODAgMTA4IC00MTAgMTE3IC03NSA1IC04OCA5IC04OCAyNCAwIDkgNyA3 NQoxNSAxNDYgMjYgMjMwIDQ1IDU1OSA1MiA4OTQgMyAxODEgNyAzMjkgOCAzMjkgMSAwIDE5IC0y NSAzOSAtNTV6Ii8+CjwvZz4KPC9zdmc+Cg==
Just proving a point.
Perhaps you want a character limit and spam protection? But how?
this project was created due to wanting to give control of communication and data back to the people
The “giving control of communication” goal seems to contradict the “viewer automatically shares without a choice” and the dependence on good-intent node owners not moderating their node content.
If a node owner hosts a community, what prevents them from moderating that community?
@Plebbitor I could not join the matrix, please check the server is OK 😓
Good job
This again? It’s basically lemmy but less secure, stop advertising it
From the whitepaper:
- The user completes the captcha challenge and publishes his post and captcha challenge answer over pubsub.
- The subplebbit owner’s client gets notified that the user published to his pubsub, the post is not ignored because it contains a correct captcha challenge answer.
- The subplebbit owner’s client publishes a message over pubsub indicating that the captcha answer is correct or incorrect. Peers relaying too many messages with incorrect or no captcha answers get blocked to avoid DDOS of the pubsub.
- The subplebbit owner’s client updates the content of his subplebbit’s public key-based addressing automatically
I may be misunderstanding how this protocol works, but at step 10 what prevents the owner from publishing the captcha answer as incorrect as a method of censorship based on the content of the post?
The owner can obviously moderate and thereby censor, anyway. Thats not the kind of censorship free this thing advertises. Its not more or less censored as lemmy is when instance hosts do moderation.
Do you mean spamming faulty captcha answers to trigger the DDOS protection on the peers?
Technically cool, but it’s scary that it tries to emulate the anonymous, unmoderated shithole that is 4chan. Go to 4chan now and try to imagine something even more racist, nazi and unhinged.
deleted by creator
How long until this gets overrun with 🍕 and nobody wants to use it…
Not sure how moderation would even be possible with this model.
I bring this point up every time I see someone pushing the idea of P2P or federated social networks with no moderation and no one has a solution for it yet. Because there isn’t a solution.
It’s like these people don’t even want to look at existing social media with minimal moderation. It doesn’t take long on 4chan and other less reputable *chan style sites to see that no matter how much you want to shake off the chains of overbearing moderators, there is a bare minimum moderation necessary for any social media to survive.
Even social media sites on TOR have moderation.
When even the darkest, least moderated cesspools online still have some minimal moderation, it should be a massive neon sign that there needs to be some moderation functionality.
Because there isn’t a solution.
This has been discussed and experimented with to death where such networks existed for a long time. Just because you never heard of them or even knew they exist doesn’t mean that they don’t.
See Freenet/Hyphanet and the three approaches (local trust, shared user trust lists, web of trust) if you want to learn something. The second one worked out the best from a performance and scalability point of view compared to the third.
See Freenet/Hyphanet
Please don’t, because it is literally the largest place online that openly trades CSAM. Law enforcement even run their own nodes there to try to catch people.
Didn’t click on your links. But LEA does this move against any network that may offer anonymization. Don’t use Tor hidden services. Don’t go near I2P. Stay away from Freenet…etc. This even includes any platform that is seen as not fully under control, like Telegram at some point.
In its essence, this move is no different from “Don’t go near Lemmy because it’s a Putin-supporting communist platform filled with evil state agents”.
Does any network that may offer anonymization (even if misleadingly) attract undesirable people, possibly including flat out criminals? Yes.
Should everyone stay away from all of them because of that? That’s up to each individual to decide, preferably after seeing for themselves.
But parroting “think of the children” talking points against individual networks points to either intellectual deficiency, high susceptibility to consent-manufacturing propaganda, or some less innocent explanations.
Holy shit you cannot be serious. In the shortest possible terms: trust systems are forms of moderation. Anything implementing them would not fall under what I was talking about.
This project doesn’t appear to implement that. It doesn’t even appear to have a bare minimum way for users to prevent themselves from sharing something they viewed but don’t want to share. Viewing something should not imply trust.
Definitely appreciate the assumption that I’m just a dumbass and you’ve come to shine the light of enlightenment on me though. That my point of view could only be possible to reach through ignorance. That’s always nice.
Apologies if I was presumptions and/or my tone was too aggressive.
Quibbling at No Moderation = Bad usually refers to central moderation where “someone” decides for others what they can and can’t see without them having any say in the matter.
Bad moderation is an experienced problem at a much larger scale. It in fact was one of the reasons why this very place even exists. And it was one of the reasons why “transparent moderation” was one of the celebrated features of Lemmy with its public
Modlog, although “some” quickly started to dislike that and try to work around it, because power corrupts, and the modern power seeker knows how to moral grandstand while power grabbing.All trust systems give the user the power, by either letting him/her be the sole moderator, or by letting him/her choose moderators (other users) and how much each one of them is trusted and how much weight their judgment carries, or by letting him/her configure more elaborate systems like WoT the way he/she likes.
Plebbit only hosts text. Images from google and other sites can be linked/embedded in posts. This fixes the issue of hosting any nefarious content.
Nowhere in the project whitepaper or FAQ does it talk about banning image hosting. Base64 encoding images in the text post is trivial, so maybe OP is the one projecting this intent or feature?
Can you host a node to earn its token?
Hopefully! That way all the crypto bros will concentrate there and leave normal social media alone.
If there’s no central server then where is all the data stored?. With Lemmy I know the instance creator has to host it all on his own server.
Great question! Unlike Lemmy, which relies on federation with dedicated servers, Plebbit is fully peer-to-peer (P2P) and does not have a central server or even instances. Instead, storage happens via a combination of IPFS and users seeding data. Here’s how it works:
Where Is Plebbit’s Data Stored?
-
Subplebbit Owners Host the Data (Like Torrent Seeders)
- Each subplebbit owner runs a Plebbit node that stores and republishes their own community’s data.
- Their device (or a server, if they choose) must be online 24/7 to ensure the subplebbit remains accessible.
- If a subplebbit owner goes offline, their community disappears unless others seed it—very similar to how torrents work.
-
Users Act as Temporary Seeders
- Any user who visits a subplebbit automatically stores and seeds the content they read.
- This means active users help distribute content, like in BitTorrent.
- If a user closes their app and no one else is seeding the content, it becomes unavailable until the owner comes back online.
-
IPFS for Content Addressing
- Posts and comments are stored in IPFS, which ensures that popular content remains available longer.
- Unlike a blockchain, there is no permanent historical ledger—if no one is seeding, the data is gone.
- Each post has a content address (CID), meaning that as long as someone has the data, it can be re-fetched.
-
PubSub for Live Updates
- Plebbit uses peer-to-peer pubsub (publish-subscribe messaging) to broadcast new content between nodes in real-time.
- This helps users see new posts without needing a central server to pull updates from.
What Happens If Everyone Goes Offline?
- If no one’s online to seed a subplebbit, it’s as if it never existed.
- This is a trade-off for infinite scalability—it removes the need for central databases but relies on community participation.
- Think of it like a dead torrent—no seeders, no content.
Comparison With Lemmy
Feature Lemmy Plebbit Hosting Model Federated servers (instances) Fully P2P (no servers) Who Stores Data? Instance owners (like Reddit mods running a server) Subplebbit owners & users (like torrents) If Owner Goes Offline? Instance still exists; data stays up The community disappears unless users seed it Historical Content Availability Instances keep all posts forever Older data may disappear if not seeded Scalability Limited by instance storage & bandwidth Infinite, as long as people seed
Bottom Line: No Servers, Just Users
- With Lemmy: The instance owner has to host everything themselves like a mini-Reddit admin.
- With Plebbit: The subplebbit owner AND users seed the content—no one has to host a centralized database.
- If something is popular, it stays alive.
- If something isn’t seeded, it disappears, just like torrents.
It’s a radical trade-off for decentralization and censorship resistance, but if no one cares about a community, the content naturally dies off. No server, no mods deleting you from a database—just pure P2P.
Hope that clears it up! 🚀
Is this reply AI generated?
Partially.
How are users able to decide what they seed and what they don’t? Just because I viewed something doesn’t mean I necessarily want to support its proliferation.
Either way you still do. Think about it.
Please spare me whatever philosophical navel gazing you’re trying to do here. I’m asking what should be an incredibly straightforward question about what should be basic functionality in any P2P seeding based system:
What control, if any, does an individual user have over what they seed back into the system?
Some P2P systems just give each user an encrypted blob of all sorts of stuff, so the individual user can’t choose and on paper isn’t responsible for whatever it is that they are seeding back in. I’m personally not ok with not having a way to ensure that I’m not seeding nazi manifestos that were stealthing as a reasonably named subplebbit.
I’m personally not ok with not having a way to ensure that I’m not seeding nazi manifestos that were stealthing as a reasonably named subplebbit.
I kind of get the feeling this is exactly the content they want to help host when they refer to “censorship resistance”. This was also the key selling point of Gab when it launched.
Edit: even their logo is a meme commonly used in far right circles, so there seem to be a lot of dog whistles for the type of community they want to create.
I liked “navel gazing” I’m keeping that one.
I will still check it out, but it doesn’t mean I will adopt it.
Fair
Not only is IPFS not built on solid foundations, offered nothing new to the table, and is generally bad at data retention, but the “opt-in seeding” model was always a step backwards and not a good match for apps like plebbit.
The anonymous distributes filesystem model (a la Freenet/Hyphanet) where each file segment is anonymously and randomly “inserted” into the distributed filesystem is the way to go. This fixes the “seeder power” problem, as undesirable but popular content can stay highly available automatically, and unpopular but desirable content can be re-inserted/healed periodically by healers (seeders). Only both unpopular and undesirable content may fizzle out of the network, but that can only happen in the context of messaging apps/platforms if 0 people tried pull and 0 people tried to reinsert the content in question over a long period of time.
When everyone will have a 50G PON fiber connection at home, IPFS is going to be the standard serverless configuration.
2030? Everyone uses that date for everything futuristic
Thanks for the detailed reply that helps, this sounds really interesting, with the late stage capitalism we are going through, I’ve lost all interest in private corporate controled social networks, hence the switch to Lemmy, but the instance owner is still a single point of failure with Lemmy but at least you can switch to another instance.
I have a few concerns about Plebbit though.
A - with torrents you know the size of the torrent beforehand and can decide if you can download it all and continue seeding it so long as you have the space for it on your drive, but with a forum like Plebbit, how would a user know how much space on their drive Plebbit will take for the Plebbit content they interact with. Is there a way to dedicate X gigabytes of limited storage space for it and anything above that gets purged to make space for new data?
B - One of the best uses Of Reddit imo is that it’s very easy to Google for something and find a relevant Reddit thread, especially for something niche, since Plebbit only keeps the most popular content and the rest goes away if not seeded, does it mean it won’t be a good for niche archival data, maybe that’s a use case that Plebbit isn’t design to handle and that’s okay.
C - Bots are a big concern for most social media, especially the ones used for spreading propaganda and misinformation, how does a P2P social forum like Plebbit plan to handle bots.?
So there are servers then…
-
