I have done more offroading in a tricycle…
One with plastic wheels (and plastic tyres)

Why not both?

std::vector ulUtil {"GNU", "Alpine", "BusyBox", "Toybox"};
int currentUtil = 0;
do
{
	try
	{
		OS(ulUtil[currentUtil], "Linux").use();
	}
	catch (USER::Bored & err)
	{
		currentUtil++;
		continue;
	}
}
while ((currentUtil < ulUtil.size()) || (findMoreUtil(ulUtil)));

But where are the opportunist industries, like a recycling plant^[1] that will only run during high insolation hours, set inside multi storey structures, sharing land area with other, lightweight industries?

Another way is to use a content extractor.

So

• the user will select the rectangular region to be extracted
• Extractor will extract
  • Josh’s profile picture
  • “Josh”
  • The tick mark SVG
  • “@jpshycodes”
  • “Bro is coding …” - the comment text
  • Information that a frame is to be reproduced
  • Ryan Els’s profile picture
  • “Ryan Els”
  • The tick mark SVG again, but this time it will be deduplicated
  • “@RyanEls4”
  • “12h”
  • “Rate my …” - text for the comment inside the frame
  • The jpeg picture inside the frame (yes it’s a jpeg and not a PNG. IDK why. But look at it)

Then it would convert it into a reproducible package which can then also match your colour scheme for background colour etc.

Now just need to make such an extractor
And a corresponding format in Lemmy to display it

Sure it will be more work, but this way we can retain more fidelity with less space taken.

It will not be usable as proof, because the thing can be just written, but it’s not like pictures work as a very good proof nowadays, anyway.

Needs more line spacing.

The only real way to write protect it is by printing the pdf into pdf (making it a pdf of an image).

I would say they are doing the same with Linux, but I’ll just wait for it to become obvious.

Kate, KDevelop, QtCreator are the ones I use.

Ya.

The only times I am really using ping are when I am expecting some bad connection problem.

Like disconnection, altogether.

Also, Barry in the TV series saying, “Mach 20 is not a thing”

Ah sh✫t got me!

You managed to tick the buzz word without having to make a native app for my computer.

I normally like GitLab issues as a place for bug reports.

A FAQ and an old style forum works pretty well for help.
In fact, just make a community on Lemmy for the forum part and you’ll have what’s required.

GitHub also has this new “Discussions” thing which should do some good, for those that want to stay on GitHub

But is it made in Rust ?

No?

You chaps gotta tick all the buzz-words!

Even better, print some anti-empire propaganda.

Give the low-level employee some ideas to quit giving their life to the empire.

This seems to fit all the points I put somewhere else in this thread.

• Nice, glancing angles on the teeth
• Adequate distance between teeth (and unlike mine, the surface between the teeth has been properly smoothed out, making cleaning easier)
• Nice girth on the handle, making hard presses into the object doable without bending the neck
• Despite the girth, the handle shape with properly defined edges, reduces the DEX requirement of the user
  • On top of that, you have chamfers and fillets on those edges, reducing pressure on the skin (which I didn’t even think to ask for)
• None of the form-over-function bs as is done in 2

This is even better than the fork that I have on my table right now.

Though that kink on the back end of the handle seems to trigger my OCD.

I don’t like the bulging teeth in the sides of 5, but I guess that depends more upon what you are eating with it.

I prefer teeth with as acute an angle as viable, so for the front part, I’d go with 2.

The space between the teeth also matters:

• it decides how soft and brittle an object you can pierce with it, without the object breaking down.
• as it decides the variety of objects you can use to clean them.

The fork I use has ~1.5 times the space between teeth as 2

As you said, the handle in 2 is a no. I would be fine with either of 1 and 5 for that.

Though I like 5 for the neck girth of the handle in the 3rd dimension, which would make it last longer and be better for harder stuff, the oval shape seems like it would cause more unwanted turning during use, requiring a higher Dexterity for handling.

While the handle for 3 looks like it would be fine for use, it seems like it would break in ~6 months.

Sorry, your username really made me feel like you were being playful and I answered accordingly

Ahh, thanks. Now I get it.

I had googled FNQ before asking that and felt like it didn’t make sense, because it showed the name of a place instead of some org or a topic.
Now it does

welp, I don’t even know which state has the most sugar-cane production in my own country

a way to turn off auto sync in OneDrive app

i didn’t touch Windows since

Pretty sure you found out the best way to turn off auto sync in OneDrive app