maybe-later-honey maybe-later-kiddo

The White House, in a reflection of their public confidence (hubris?) regarding the politics of Biden’s positioning on Israel, arranged a call with Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.).

Fetterman, who has delighted in trolling left-wing critics by resolutely standing with Israel since Oct. 7, told me young voters should consider the implications of enabling a candidate who would likely given Netanyahu even more of a free hand.

“If you sit this out, or throw your vote away, you now are effectively empowering Bibi, and you’re definitely going to be empowering Trump,” cheeto-man he said.

We can set this up very directly: it’s us versus them — and us is just voting for us, and them means voting for a third-party or Trump,” as one Biden official put it to me. brump

In the short term, that means seizing on any chance to complicate the ballot access of the third-party candidates freedom-and-democracy and attempting to discredit their motives or at least highlight the less savory aspects of their character.

Later this year, Biden officials hope to dispatch trusted progressive surrogates to warn against a third-party flirtation — hope you like the Midwest in fall, Senator Sanders! flattened-bernie — and plan to bombard the internet with the same message on digital ads even sooner.

One idea: Enlist a series of sicko-zoomer younger voters who admit to being tempted by a third-party hopeful but explain they’re backing Biden because any other choice ensures Trump’s election. maybe-later-honey

Anti-anti-fa - kelly

  • LeZero [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    705 months ago

    “If you sit this out, or throw your vote away, you now are effectively empowering Bibi"

    Ok? Isn’t Joe empowering Bibi now (and, in the hypothetical he wins the election, in the foreseeable future)? Do these assholes hear themselves?

    • hotcouchguy [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      555 months ago

      Fetterman, who absolutely supports the genocide, warns that electing trump would give absolute support to the genocide? And that’s why he’s anti-trump? What?

      • barrbaric [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        165 months ago

        I think he means that libs will still believe that Trump will make things worse, not that it’s true, but this might be a certified Stroke Moment™.

    • PKMKII [none/use name]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      285 months ago

      Yeah but Trump will do it in a way that doesn’t put on airs that he’s worried about innocent Gazans dying. And we all know democracy dies in the lack of performative hand-wringing.

      • LeZero [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        125 months ago

        Well yeah, I dont take Fetterman seriously anyway, it’s just more of the same Trump fearmongering

    • SacredExcrement [any, comrade/them]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Liberals have to maintain that they’re the good guys, always

      So that means Trump would do something worse than what Biden is literally currently doing

      What that imagined evil he’ll perpetrate is, I’m never told

      Maybe they’re implying he’d nuke Gaza

      Maybe they’re implying he’d send in American troops

      We don’t know

    • SUPAVILLAIN
      link
      fedilink
      English
      35 months ago

      “If you sit this out, or throw your vote away, you now are effectively empowering Bibi"

      I believe the word Genocide Joe used was “unconditional”. How can Bibi get any more empowered than that?