• @Whitebrow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5524 days ago

        People seem to be angry at you for not knowing how the French count. My condolences. I found it funny tho. Have un upvote

        • @einkorn@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5624 days ago

          Well, I DO know how the French count and compared to English it IS highly confusing. You can hardly convince me that saying “Four times twenty and ten” is as straight forward as saying “Nine tens”.

          And just to be clear: I’m not some Yankee or Brit with a superiority complex, no, I am German, and we have our own shitty version of this: Instead of moving along the digits from highest to lowest, as in “Four hundreds and two tens and nine”, we do “Four hundred and nine and two tens”.

          • @AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            4224 days ago

            Wow, it’s like US uses metric system for counting and y’all do “imperial counting”

          • @Beryl@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            8
            edit-2
            24 days ago

            It supposedly comes from originaly counting in base 20 ( a.k.a : vigesimal system) in some proto-european language. There are traces of it in breton, albanese, basque and danish for example. Even in english, there is a reminiscence of vigesimal, in the “score”, see for example Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address “Fourscore and seven years ago…” means 87 years ago.

          • @FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            6
            edit-2
            18 days ago

            It’s less confusing if you think of 70 and 90 as separate words without trying to analyze what their constituting words mean.

            But etymologically, sure, it makes no sense.

          • @Smc87
            link
            English
            2
            edit-2
            24 days ago

            The dude was saying people are angry at you because they don’t understand, not that you dont understand.

          • @barsoap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            223 days ago

            Instead of moving along the digits from highest to lowest, as in “Four hundreds and two tens and nine”, we do “Four hundred and nine and two tens”.

            English is less consistent, going from nine-teen to twenty-one. German stays consistent with its lower two digits.

            • @Rinox@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              English
              823 days ago

              From 11 to 19 is always kind of weird in many languages. In Italian you go from essentially saying “one-ten” “two-ten”…“six-ten” to “ten-seven” “ten-eight” “ten-nine”. Then it goes in like in English. Why? No reason ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

        • @Valmond@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          23 days ago

          Soixante-quinze virgule neuf vs soixante-dix-neuf virgule cinq.

          Easy peasy!

          Edit: it wasn’t easy peasy.

      • @Beryl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        17
        edit-2
        24 days ago

        It supposedly comes from originaly counting in base 20 ( a.k.a : vigesimal system) in some proto-european language. There are traces of it in breton, albanese, basque and danish for example. Even in english, there is a reminiscence of vigesimal, in the “score”, see for example Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address which famously starts with : “Fourscore and seven years ago…”, meaning 87 years ago.

      • @zaphod@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        523 days ago

        No you can’t, because the source has written it in the usual hindu-arabic numerals as 79,5 and not as “soixante-dix-neuf virgule cinq”, you don’t need to pronounce the numerals to copy them.

    • Kairos
      link
      fedilink
      English
      524 days ago

      Yes but is that the average panel, oraverage of still a working panels?

    • @UnityDevice@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      Careful using the word efficiency there, as it has a different meaning when talking about solar panels - it indicates how much energy the panel can extract from the light hitting it. The best modern panels you can buy are below 25% efficient, and since these are from the 90s they were probably about half that when new.