Round 1: 200 votes for Jordan

Round 2: 199 votes for Jordan

Round 3: 194 votes for Jordan

Additional detractors this round:

Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA): Jordan round 2, McHenry round 3

Tom Kean Jr. (R-NY): Jordan round 2, McCarthy round 3

Marc Molinaro (R-NY): Jordan round 2, Zeldin round 3

Other GOP changes:

Wesley Hunt (R-TX): Jordan round 2, absent round 3

Derrick Van Orden (R-WI): Jordan round 2, absent round 3

  • OpenStars
    link
    fedilink
    1299 months ago

    Aside from the content, I want to take a moment to appreciate how this has such an informative title!:-)

    • Heratiki
      link
      fedilink
      339 months ago

      No doubt. Succinct and accurate with little flair.

        • @kboy101222@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          13
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Here, I’ll fix it:

          Oh no! Jim Jordan loses the Speaker vote for a third time! You won’t believe how many hold outs there were!

          Followed by 10 paragraphs of SEO ridden, AI generated drivel that buries the answer to the point you give up on finding it

          • @VantaBrandon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            49 months ago

            Sums up internet articles in 2023, 95% of which could be less than a paragraph, but need to fluff it up to 6 pages to inlay some ads and get those juicy organic clicks

          • OpenStars
            link
            fedilink
            39 months ago

            Tune in at 11 to find out how! … to access our video on the subject, which points to another webpage, which again links to a video, that again goes to a different story, hey this all seems familiar somehow…? :-P

            It’s our own damn fault I suppose, for engaging with it and thus not just allowing but outright making/encouraging it to happen.:-(

            Not that that excuses them for doing it though:-(.

  • squiblet
    link
    fedilink
    789 months ago

    The idea of Jordan being speaker was one of the stupidest and most offensive ideas they’ve come up with recently, so it’s nice that it isn’t working out.

  • @demonquark@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    689 months ago

    I read somewhere that a group of 55 republicans who plan to make sure he gets less votes every round. To rub in how much they don’t want him.

    • appel
      link
      fedilink
      99 months ago

      What I don’t get is if we know about this plan, surely gymbo must know as well. So why not just call it quits? Does he like to be humiliated? Is this some sort of fetish for him?

  • @some_guy
    link
    199 months ago

    Those numbers are going in the wrong direction, guy. I think you should bow out. But I hope you’re dumb enough to keep going.

    Repubs are the greatest impediment to progress. Dems are the second greatest.

    • flipht
      link
      fedilink
      69 months ago

      Then again, maybe if he keeps going he will unite everyone behind the banner of “Not Gym Jordan,” which is a great service he’s able to provide us.

    • krolden
      link
      fedilink
      29 months ago

      What progress would be happening if they did name a speaker?

  • @Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    149 months ago

    If this was ‘House of Cards’

    Dems would offer Blue state GOPs who voted for Jeffries easy wins in November. The ten or so voted he’d need would be offset by loses in other states.

    • Cethin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      89 months ago

      I don’t know if that’s a good idea honestly. First, they’d be giving up winnable seats in the future. Second, it’d be Democrats in charge of a republican controlled house. Sure, they could put up things they want for a vote, but stupid people would now think they’re responsible for the nothing that gets done. Letting Republicans tear each other apart is probably better politically without major concessions.

      • @Dagwood222@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        89 months ago

        True story. After the 2016 election, there was a panel discussion with the creators of House of Cards, Scandal, The West Wing, and all the other US political TV shows. All the participants said the same thing; if they’d had a character denigrate American POWs the way Trump did in real life, the networks and advertisers would have demanded that the character be treated like a pariah on the show. We’re already beyond anything fictional TV could allow.

        • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          79 months ago

          “Reality is stranger than what TV advertisers can imagine” is a lot less interesting than “reality is stranger than fiction”