• LeftReddit2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I have a decidated, dirty windows 10 laptop for all my windows needs.

    “What windows needs do you have?”

    CompTIA won’t let you take certs on Linux lol. Trust me, I tried. My professor was a fat, angry, scottish guy who also hates windows and took my side, but nothing we did made that shit work.

    …and also yeah, online gaming. Fuck anticheat software.

    • notabot@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      13 hours ago

      They’ve been in the freezer for an hour, they’re not just cool, they’re positively chilly.

    • Jarix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      What do you mean when you used the word safe? Genuinely curious, not just being a dick

      • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 hours ago

        No level of alcohol consumption is safe for our health

        To identify a “safe” level of alcohol consumption, valid scientific evidence would need to demonstrate that at and below a certain level, there is no risk of illness or injury associated with alcohol consumption. The new WHO statement clarifies: currently available evidence cannot indicate the existence of a threshold at which the carcinogenic effects of alcohol “switch on” and start to manifest in the human body.

        • Jarix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Oh that. Bloody useless as I understand it.

          Apparently according to something I also read the amount of carcinogen you are exposed to on a 18 minute walk next to a low but noticeable traffic (I remember it saying 20ish cars per minute) is orders of magnitude stronger in regards to cancer causing factors in daily life.

          I’m not 100% certain about equating carcinogenic effects to causing cancer but I don’t know any other reason to talk about carcinogens.

          Sorry to bother you, this was all a nothing burger. Sorry I asked and wasted your time, and mine too

      • Peacepath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Old latin wise people used to say “in vino veritas”, the truth is in the wine… and so it is likely to harm crypto and security… if we accept mythology as a reliable source…

          • Peacepath@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            13 hours ago

            no, you need to make the AI drink enough wine so it doesn’t hallucinate ; and it is a truth know since antiquity: if you drawn the datacenters electronic components into wine, there are no more AI hallucination… try it!

    • fonix232@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Doesn’t have to be vandalism, you can edit the site with Developer Tools and take a screenshot…

    • communism@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Inspect element? Or many other various ways of making a fake wikipedia screenshot that don’t involve editing the actual article.

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I mean I get you, but it does need to be totally open for editting, and that’s what the history and discussion pages are for–to add some hive mind filtering.

      It bothers me when wiki becomes seen as gospel by those that may not have history on something, and so it needs a method of alteration. Sure that will be abused, but then it gets rolled back.