• ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Driscoll’s business model is basically like this:

    1. Have access to largest buyer of berries in the US (Walmart, as well as others) and monopolize berry contracts for all walmart stores

    2. Have a monopoly of the genetics of the berries Walmart is contracted to buy.

    3. Sell berry seeds, etc to farmers up front so all the risk of growing (crop failure, contamination, etc) is placed squarely on the growers and not on Driscoll. The farmers can actually owe Driscoll money if they can’t harvest.

    4. Monopolize the distribution rights for what the farmers produce

    Fuck Driscoll and their shitty berries

  • ClathrateG [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    For Chinese consumers, it was a blueberry bonanza. Prices dropped so low—often $3 or less for a 9-ounce container—that state media trumpeted an era of “blueberry freedom,” in which even ordinary people can gorge on a once-exotic fruit.

    For just about everyone in the blueberry business, though, it has been a knife fight, plagued by intellectual-property theft and tanking profits.

    A healthy nutritious food is now cheap and widely available, but at what cost?? $3 or less apparently

    Driscoll’s has filed more than 20 lawsuits against companies in China, some of which it has said took its proprietary blueberry plants, propagated them and sold them to rival growers. Some Western fruit companies worked with private investigators who went undercover at plant nurseries, posing as traders or farmers so they could buy plants and hustle them off to labs for DNA testing to prove they were pirated.

    pirate-jammin

    • jack [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 days ago

      a once-exotic fruit.

      isn’t perspective the best? I can walk to a park and find wild blueberries to munch, the only thing less exotic to me are raspberries that grow like weeds

    • SoyViking [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      Some Western fruit companies worked with private investigators who went undercover at plant nurseries, posing as traders or farmers so they could buy plants and hustle them off to labs for DNA testing to prove they were pirated.

      This could become the shittiest detective story ever told.

  • tombruzzo [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 days ago

    Before I leave my comment, know I’ve read my Corey Doctorow and understand completely how companies like this could slap some IP on a blueberry genome or DNA sequence to make it proprietary. That being said:

    How the fuck do you copy growing blueberries? LOL

    • ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s extremely stupid. It’s the same as all the Monsanto controversies. You aren’t allowed (bc of IP law somehow) to replant seeds grown from Monsanto copyrighted strains. If your crop is found to contain any monsanto genetics (they’vesued unsuccessfully for accidental cross pollination, but basically if you just save seeds) then part of your crop/sales proceeds can be seized by monsanto.

      People look at this and legitimately think to themselves “yep, markets sure are efficient” when you literally can’t grow plants from seeds you own without having to give massive corporations a cut.

    • DragonBallZinn [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      The porks:

      “Stupid artists! It’s fine that AI steals your work and puts you out of business! Ideas are meant to be shared, information wants to be free! Have you no respect for INNOVOOSHUNZ!?”

      Also the porks: “Stop using my IP! Growing blueberries is MY idea!”

      • tombruzzo [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I wonder if i ever get done for all my torrenting if i can say it was for “training models” since that seems to be an acceptable excuse for the corporations

      • sodium_nitride [she/her, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        59
        ·
        2 days ago

        The class of researchers who actually do the intellectual work share in a very tiny portion of the profits made from their IP.

        Even in bourgeois economic theory, IP is rent seeking behaviour and encourages monopoly formation.

        • Le_Wokisme [they/them, undecided]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          The class of researchers who actually do the intellectual work share in a very tiny portion of the profits made from their IP.

          of course, but anyone with time and patience can selectively breed and/or graft plants and dna editing is within reach of an advanced hobbyist. fuck driscol but creating conditions where driscol can steal from some gardener who isn’t even their employee is expanding exploitation rather than restricting it as we all desire.

      • kekino [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        2 days ago

        You can remove the room in your heart. Most research that disrupts is not done by the private companies, but by researchers. Most of this advancements are typically done when they force the collaboration between researchers with (mostly) public funds that an enterprises takes the profit. Heck, even LLMs were done by university researchers that happen to collaborate with Google to get funding and compute power.

  • merdaverse@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    2 days ago

    “IP theft” of growing blueberries? We live in the stupidest of all possible realities

    • GrouchyGrouse [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 days ago

      Meanwhile all your private human moments you put online are scraped and stolen to make a demon of water and power consumption

      But that’s not theft… unlike these blueberries here!

  • Rom [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    2 days ago

    “IP theft” aka growing your own food and preventing foreign corporations from extracting profit from your own people

  • ryepunk [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 days ago

    Awww did someone not understand how other nations don’t have to respect your corporate rights? How maybe making things cheaper for everyone is broadly a good thing so no one will help you!

    did-someone

    • ExistentialNightmare@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      2 days ago

      But what about the precious rule of law? Don’t do illegal stuff that’s bad, that’s why it’s illegal.

      It’s illegal because it is bad, it is bad because it is illegal.

      It’s legal because it is good, it is good because it is legal.

      Therefore legal extraction of the surplus value of your labour is good, you see? No need to doubt the ethics and fairness in that hahaha, it’s legal after all! Keep protesting peacefully and with respect to the police, patriot 🫡

  • ExistentialNightmare@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 days ago

    Okay so, capitalists will find something super beneficial for humanity, recognise the money that they can make by keeping it hidden & having an advantage in the market; Then when you do what they should have done and utilise this net positive on mankind, they call you an evil thief.

    My resentment for the bourgeoisie never stops rising.