• Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    3 天前

    They’re both right. Syfy abandoned their baby. Amazon took it in, supported it through school, and then kicked it out at 18 before it could go to college. (Last books).

    • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      3 天前

      Fair, and accurate.

      I guess my gripe is mainly semantic in that it’s definitely not an original production by the second production company. Streaming companies tack on “original” or “original series” when they only either took over (Amazon and The Expanse) or just have the rights to stream it on their platform (Netflix with lots of shows they definitely didn’t produce).

      If they’d simply had the title card say “An Amazon Production” I’d be fine with it.

      This concludes my Nerd Rage TED Talk.

        • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          3 天前

          Seasons 4-6, I believe. My gripe is just them calling it an “original” of theirs.

          For comparison, Hulu did a similar move for The Orville for its 3rd season. But instead of calling it a “Hulu Original” the title says “Hulu presents”.

          Edit: Nevermind, I was wrong. Hulu is actually worse lol. “Hulu presents…a Hulu Original.”

    • Zetta@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 天前

      I hope someday we get a high budget remake with a lot better cgi, make the belters look like belters ya know. And adapt the last books in the series as well.

  • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 天前

    And it’s not original to either of them, it’s based on a book series.

    If you were a TV watcher, I bet it felt like betrayal when the show went to online streaming. I haven’t been a TV watcher since years started with “19”, so I first heard about The Expanse when Amazon took it over (and were streaming the whole thing).

    I think what Stargate SG-1 did was way more disingenuous. The first episode was R-rated with nudity, profanity, and violence to match. From the second episode on it was strictly PG. (The original Stargate film was PG-13.) So this was all a bit weird. (Nothing against SG-1, it’s actually a fine series.)

    • DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      3 天前

      To be fair, a lot of shows do this when they’re looking for a home initially

      The Walking Dead was pitched first to HBO and the first episode and Season 1 were more geared towards being on HBO. (season one is the only time the super no no racist hard r was used) Allegedly HBO would have kept Frank Durabont and his vision for TWD would have continued instead of being fired and replaced with Charlie Adlard

      HBO also passed on Breaking Bad and Mad Men too (Jesus Christ did they fire the exec who said no to both of these??)

      I looked up the your Stargate SG1 compliant and it’s because it was in Showtime but moved very quickly to Sci-Fi. Apparently Showtime forced them to participate in the R rated content (nudity) and the producers hated it

      • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 天前

        HBO and Showtime do the nudity in the first episode/season thing a lot. Even Netflix started doing it with things like Orange is the New Black. It’s always been weird to me that people might be so thirsty in a world with such ready access to porn that it apparently helps the shows ratings.

        • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 天前

          I worked with an older man whose wife kept him on a tight leash, including monitoring Internet activity. It would be hard for him to get access to porn that his wife didn’t know about and she would be very unhappy if he accessed it.

          These kinds of shows would be perfect for him.

          • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 天前

            You are telling me that she monitored his Internet activity but not what he watched? That HBO was easier than a private window or clearing history? Something that’s been part of Internet browsing for 30 years, since dude wasn’t old? That sounds like bullshit.

            • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 天前

              She definitely monitored what he watched. However, there were a few allowances like watching prestige TV that she also liked.

              As for clearing history or private windows, she had installed tracking software to “protect the kids” and she would know if there was no browsing history at a time when he was online and assume the worst.

                • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 天前

                  Perhaps, but there are a variety of relationships where going to porn may not be acceptable, but media like this which skirts the line may be acceptable to someone’s relational, moral, or other reasons.

                  I would go to porn, but I’ve learned that my attitudes towards morality aren’t universal. Some people need an excuse or have a limit in a way that I don’t.

  • joeljoelle@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 天前

    It’s the new economy, just buy something and put your name on it, it’s what the POS in chief does so why not. The makers in this economy get fucked every time

      • Breezy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 天前

        Yeah but they got what would be magical health care there. None of us are gonna be looking 40 in our 70s. I dont even think it needs a reboot except for alex. He needs to br brought back for sure, but the slow is just different enough and pretty close just to continue.

  • leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 天前

    i had the same feeling when i saw my first “netflix original”.

    but after a few and nobody is fact checking, i just ignore it. it is original to netflix i guess. jeniuses.

    • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 天前

      Maybe it’s a country/market “original”?

      I had to think, but the few times I remember seeing “Netflix Original” for shows that I knew 100% were not original to Netflix, they were Canadian shows. Pretty sure they were Schitt’s Creek, Continuum, and/or Orphan Black. Maybe Netflix was the only service carrying them in the US and that allowed them to call it an “original” with a straight face?

      At least with Black Mirror, Netflix is producing them now. It’s not “original” to them (like The Expanse wasn’t original to Amazon) but at least they have an actual stake in it.

      But yeah, I just ignore it lol.

      • leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 天前

        good point, it could be “locally” original loool. but that’s only a wikipedia away from not being original like you said.

        heheh, nice try netflix.