• NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    For the Cali governor race, I was actually pretty excited to vote. Then I looked into candidates and literally none of the top 8 candidates could even answer “yes” when asked if they would call what’s happening in Gaza a genocide. I know it’s not super relevant from the perspective of a state, but it really took the wind out of my sails.

    Also the state then proceeded to vote for some millionaires that don’t actually give a fuck about us lol! Yay!!!

  • cheffrey@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    We’re obligated to use every tool at our disposal in the fight. No one tool will fix everything.

    Voting is one of our many tools

    • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      Voting is one of our many tools

      It’s only a tool if there’s a non-fascist candidate available. Name one such person in the US.

        • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          I never said they are. It was more of a clarification that voting isn’t always a tool, but usually.

          As for specific candidates - highly depends on the country. There’s countries like USA, North Korea or Eritrea, where there isn’t a single non-sociopathic soul in politics, effectively making elections pointless.

          And there’s other countries, where most candidates are horrible, but a handful of somewhat decent ones also exist, so at the very least there are options. We can argue about their viability, but them existing is in itself a step up.

        • Smaile@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          20 hours ago

          this is why your country will not learn from this experience, to many of you are still far to proud.

        • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          24 hours ago

          I’ve never been to the USA, and I thank God every day for that.

          Why though? Are we only allowed to have opinions about the countries we currently live in?

          Well, my point stands regardless of country. If all the parties and their candidates are fascists - voting is pretty much pointless.

          Luckily, that’s usually not the case in most countries, so voting may have some sort of impact. Even if the party you vote for only gets 3% of votes.

          • 7101334@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            20 hours ago

            You’re apparently getting downvoted for not being an American but

            As an American (or my preference, a future citizen of the New California Republic), I agree with you when it comes to federal-level and upper-state-level politics. Local politics can have actual human candidates, but it’s only fascist reptiles higher up - yes, even Bernie, who is a liberal Zionist.

            Ilhan Omar is maybe the only exception.

      • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        You need someone to vote for.

        Easy. I will vote for the person who will do the least harm to my country as it is a fact that someone will be elected.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          vote for the person who will do the least harm

          Republicans say they’re doing this every election cycle.

          Democrats say they’re doing this every election cycle.

          It does not appear to be a working strategy, when your “least harm” candidates are all dictated by their advertising budgets and national media relationships

        • Lileath@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Who would you vote for in an election between Mussolini and Franco? Because that is where your country is headed

              • ShadyGrove@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                27 minutes ago

                There are plenty of things besides the president on ballots though. In fact, I would argue those are even more impactful to your life than any of the federal candidates.

            • Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Don’t tell this to the “pro-voting” crowd cause they despise anyone who looks outside the uniparty.

              • ShadyGrove@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                28 minutes ago

                I was talking about all the state and local candidates on elections, not to mention judges and other things. Everyone should vote. It’s the bare minimum. Not to mention the primaries.

      • Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Election boycotts require a mass movement to work, not just general disenfranchisement and non participation. Catalonia comes to mind, as controversial as that was by the “just vote” crowd when the referendums were making headlines. I can’t think of many places in the US where that sort of coordinated non-participation is even floated as an idea in the public consciousness. If you have any examples I’d be interested to hear though

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Election boycotts require a mass movement to work

          Absolutely. And that’s what we saw during the '24 primary in Michigan. Tens of thousands of spoiled ballots from residents disgusted with the Gaza Genocide.

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Anyone can make a cool-sounding quip. One I’ve heard a lot is “If voting could change anything, they wouldn’t let us do it.”

    • 7101334@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      20 hours ago

      To anyone who doesn’t read the link, they gave the most likely candidate to actually beat the corporate-owned Democrats 10 minutes to support updated paperwork, and disqualified him when he didn’t respond within 10 minutes.

      Now Bacerra is virtually guaranteed to be governor. He is, to no one’s surprise, owned by corporations. He allegedly said “what Israel did is not within international norms and it should not be part of the community of nations”, but being a corporate-owned Democrat, I’d be surprised if he actually does… anything at all to facilitate Pissrael’s expulsion from civilization.

  • BehavioralClam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    23 hours ago

    They try hard to stop people from the groups they know don’t support them, because that makes the cost of fraud more, as the competition will have an easier time doing it themselves.

    • Smaile@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      yup, only reason they do it is because its a bigger pain in the ass later to rewrite for the history books if they don’t manage decent.

  • PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 day ago

    I find many anarchists are against electoralism but still vote because they recognize it’s easy and can make a tiny difference. They just focue their efforts on direct action rather than electoral politics. The ones who say “don’t vote” are idiots

    • Azrael@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Anarchism isn’t strictly about being against electoralism. It’s more about the justification of power.

      If a hierarchical system can’t morally justify why some should command and others should obey then it should be dismantled.

    • SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      There are valid reasons to vote and there are valid reasons not to vote.

      As an example: many indigenous people living on land the US claims to own were made certain promises by the US government. These promises were made to their people as a nation, not to them as individuals. By accepting US citizenship and voting in US elections, they would be tacitly legitimizing the occupation of their land and also surrendering any claim to the land they were promised. In fact, the US government often attempted to force citizenship upon indigenous people whether they wanted it or not.

      As a white person, I suppose I may as well vote, but voting is part of the corrupt imperialist system and therefore part of the problem, and I won’t disparage anyone who has a conviction against participating.

      • PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        That’s a good point, although I would still argue that not voting in that case is a useful form of resistance. Like have governments ever felt threatened by nonvoters? Especially the US?

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      voting is fine, but your vote can’t change how other people vote. this is where a lot of folks seem to throw up their hands, like if they don’t win, there was no point.

      and it can change who is on the ballot… if you vote in the primaries. which were just yesterday… and how many people voted in those? 22% in CA, compared to 62% who voted in 2024 general.

      the problem with voting, and in life in general, is most folks want everyone else to do the work for them, and then they want to complain about the result not being what they wanted… while they never participated. and if you call them out, they call you a jerk or make excuses.

      You don’t have to vote in every election, sure, but there is a major difference between being aware/active and not trying at all.

      • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        I voted.

        Was pretty easy. I started by removing all Republicans from consideration. Then I used the internet to do some looking into the remaining candidates and made my selections. Remember to do a little extra research on anyone listed as “independent” or “no party” as they might be wolves in sheep’s clothing. I found two Republicans who ran as not Republican to try to get more votes.

        Took me roughly an hour and there were a lot of positions/candidates on this ballot.

        Not that hard, folks.

        • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          I voted too!

          Anti-incumbent for the most part, and voted for a lot of third party and independent candidates locally.

  • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I love how the same people who say voting is pointless because both sides are bad are the same people who complain about people saying both sides are bad.

  • MartianRecon@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    Man so many people want to change the world and won’t do a single thing to actually do anything huh?

      • MartianRecon@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Yep. People want their bespoke utopiae, and don’t want to do any little thing to push society in that direction. They want it to magically appear.

  • Banana@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    207
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Do people realize you can go out and vote while recognizing the system is rigged? Like what do you lose from casting a vote?

  • BabyVi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Voting doesn’t hurt anything but saying its gonna solve all this is wishful thinking.

  • Beetschnapps@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    If your apathy was so damn important it would have accomplished something, ANYTHING by now…

    Meanwhile other people keep taking advantage of said apathy every fucking day while you claim arrogance and apathy every day you shitty moron…

    You’re just lying to my face about how much you love others using you…

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      other people keep taking advantage of said apathy

      Screaming “vote harder” at all the folks getting dragged into ICE detention centers

  • Azrael@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Why is the dog wearing an anarchism T shirt? That it not what anarchism is at all.