wsj.com
www.wsj.com

https://archive.is/rrE5R

By analyzing $4 trillion of shipments between January 2024 and November 2025, the Kiel Institute researchers found that foreign exporters absorbed only about 4% of the burden of last year’s U.S. tariff increases by lowering their prices, while American consumers and importers absorbed 96%.

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.worldEnglish
    66·
    2 days ago

    … Isn’t that. Like. The point of a tarrif?

    What are they trying to distract us from? trump doing the nazis thing? the epstein thing? the invasions of other countries thing?

    Maybe trump died and they’re hiding it while they shove the refurbished chucky-cheese animatronic robots up his ass.

  • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    46·
    2 days ago

    Was the methodology for the study “Step 1, open eyes. Step 2, look at reality as it exists. Step 3, Document results.”

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      181·
      2 days ago

      This is the methodology for most studies. Science is just trying to understand the observable world with measurements.

      Of course Americans are paying for the tariffs. There’s the possibility that sellers would eat the costs (by lowering prices proportionately to account for the tariffs), but that only happened 4% of the time.

      I’m not especially surprised, but I did think it’d be even closer to 0% than it is.

  • Asafum@lemmy.world
    27·
    2 days ago

    Trump to Europe today/yesterday: Let me take Greenland or I’ll tax my own population even harder!! Join my board of “peace” or my citizens are getting a tax increase! That will show you!

    • tempest@lemmy.ca
      4·
      2 days ago

      I mean if there is enough room in the profit margin the producer could adjust the price to keep the cost the same.

      I can’t imagine why they would given the the way the tariffs are applied though.

  • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    10·
    1 day ago

    Thank you captain obvious. Why do we have to do studies into things everyone already knows, when Trump doesn’t understand something and spreads bullshit? We know what tariffs are. Looking up the meaning of the word in a thesaurus I wouldn’t call “research”.

  • DCErik@lemmy.zip
    17·
    2 days ago

    In other ‘news’, Sun to Rise in East Tomorrow, Pope Professes Catholicism, Bear Relieves Self in Wooded Area…

    Film @ 11:00

    • D_C@sh.itjust.works
      2·
      1 day ago

      I can see the Sun. I have no interest in the Pope. But where was that film of the bear having a shit? SHOW ME THE BEAR HAVING A SHIT, NOW!!

      Also, did you know if an orange child rapist tries to distract everyone from the decades of child rape he did with his best mate Jeffery Epstein then most of the time it doesn’t work? Isn’t that weird…

  • Arancello@aussie.zone
    17·
    2 days ago

    So in the end, the tariffs really are just a sales tax paid by americans. I seem to recall that the average tax is about 20%, up from the 2.4% in the Biden term. So americans voted for a sales tax, and this evidence shows that they got it. Something like 20% tax on $4 trillion of imports would be about $800 million (so far) of taxes paid by americans so the orange buffoon can give some to Qatar, Argentina, Honduras and the tech bros. Congratulations american voters, you are successfully looting your own pockets.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    17·
    2 days ago

    Next thing they’ll say Mexico didn’t pay for the wall either.
    Maybe even that the economy isn’t actually doing that great and unemployment is increasing.
    Or that USA doesn’t really need Greenland for security.
    It’s like a smear campaign against Trump, as if he was lying all the time.
    This is liberal propaganda, you can clearly tell because they use facts, and everybody know that facts have a strong liberal bias.
    A serious reporter should report both sides equally!
    /s

    • cv_octavio@piefed.caEnglish
      8·
      2 days ago

      Next you’re gonna tell me they weren’t even EaTiNg ThE cAtS aNd DoGs Of ThE pEoPlE wHo LiVeD tHeRe either!