• 9 Posts
  • 3.95K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: November 6th, 2023

help-circle
  • otp@sh.itjust.workstoGaming@lemmy.worldHow times change
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    I think you’re making large reaches in your analogies. Are we supposed to have the government come in and bad cosmetic DLC, and then fight a war over it that splits the country (or world) in two? Lol

    My point is that cosmetic DLC (and expansion packs) isn’t the problem – the problem is loot boxes and pay-to-win microtransactions.


  • otp@sh.itjust.workstoGaming@lemmy.worldHow times change
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I have to say that the customer holds some of the blame. If people are obsessively buying cosmetics that do nothing and that’s the only way the game is being sustained…either the game is that good already, or the players are the reason the game sucks.

    When players need to spend money to be competitive, I think it’s fair to place the blame jointly on both the devs/publisher and the players. When spending money doesn’t change the game OR provides new content, it generally indicates that the player base is happy with what they’re spending money on. I don’t think that’s a problem.




  • otp@sh.itjust.workstoGaming@lemmy.worldHow times change
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    If game companies are firing their developers upon launching a game and not doing the same to their design team, there are probably bigger problems.

    My point about expansion packs was related to my original comment – I gave an example besides cosmetics of DLC I thought was ok


  • otp@sh.itjust.workstoGaming@lemmy.worldHow times change
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Oh, definitely. The one issue with cosmetic DLC is that they used to be unlockable. Sometimes paid cosmetics are more development work than the kinds of things that were unlocked in-game back in the day, but not always.

    Sometimes cosmetic DLC is a way to support the developers. Sometimes cosmetic DLC is a cashgrab. But if the game stands on its own, players generally aren’t missing much if cosmetics are paid DLC. Smash Bros. Ultimate comes to mind – there’s plenty of stuff to unlock in the game even with lots of costumes and such being behind paywalls.


  • otp@sh.itjust.workstoGaming@lemmy.worldHow times change
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t see these as a problem with what I’d said for two reasons:

    • The people making cosmetic elements are generally different from the people coding actual features
    • If an expansion pack is successful, what’s the harm in putting future development hours towards more expansion packs?