A proposal has been laid out for a new X.Org Server “main” Git branch to house their development going forward and cleaning up the development lapses over the past few years. Ultimately the hope is for having a new cleaned-up X.Org Server and XWayland Git branch for shipping new releases in 2026.

Alan Coopersmith of Oracle laid out the proposal today for a new main branch of the X.Org Server Git repository. The main emphasis is on cleaning up the Git state that became cluttered the past few years when now-XLibre developer Enrico Weigelt was making a lot of changes to the codebase that then ended up with a lot of that code being later reverted. Discussions on IRC determined that it may be easier to start over from an early 2024 snapshot of the X.Org Git state and then work from there in weeding out commits that actually remain present day without being reverted.

  • entwine@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    when now-XLibre developer Enrico Weigelt was making a lot of changes to the codebase that then ended up with a lot of that code being later reverted.

    Looked this guy up, and apparently he’s a right wing anti-vax nutjob who got yelled at by Linus Torvalds for spreading misinformation on the kernel mailing list.

    Why do we have people like this?

    • bitcrafter@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      2 days ago

      You missed the part where the reason why they are doing this is because the person who started XLibre had previously committed so much bad code to XOrg that needed to be rolled back that the git history is now a mess that is hindering forward progress. The goal of the new release is to start over from 2024 and cherry-pick the commits they want to keep in order to clean the history up.

      • GreenCrunch@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        oh boy. What a distinction, to have so many bad commits reverted that you derail a major project for months cleaning up after you.

        • hexagonwin
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          did they grant this person commit access before? not sure how so many weird commits got merged when there should’ve been code reviews and all…