This was published on nature.com.
It looks like the whole article was AI generated.Here are responses from pubpeer.
I never thought I’d see professionals just kind of collectively give up on putting effort into things. Maybe by “fexcectorn” and “frymbial” levels are abnormal?
“nature scientific reports” published it. It’s a nature publication but it’s really not the same as being published in the journal “nature”. Still fucking disturbing but they didn’t actually get this shite into one of the most trusted journals in all of academia.