Why list “trials, judges, reviews, juries, appeals” all of this as if it’s more than one thing that often times doesn’t work. Most of the convictions in the US are plea deals, they literally put you in a jail and tell you to say what they want or they’ll make things worse and the only way you can avoid this is to have money to make bail.
If your boss steals from your wages you have to jump through hoops to try and get it back and they don’t serve time. If you are accused of taking money from the company you are taken away by the state and put in jail till it can be proven you didn’t. You can’t expect me to trust that the system works in my favor when the system is clearly designed to not work in my favor.
Again, if you can provide me with a quote and source where Charlie Kirk said Joe Biden should be “executed,” I will change my opinion on his assassination being justified.
I think you mean “received a death penalty for his actions” instead of “assassination”.
execution is the killing part. it may be done by 3rd parties outside of the law (ie murder), or it could be the final part of a legal proceeding that leads to the death penalty
the death penalty is the conviction at the end of a legal proceeding
saying someone deserves the death penalty (ie jumping right to their conviction) skips the trial and sentencing etc of a normal legal proceeding. it’s not at all the same as saying someone should be tried for treason
he said that joe biden should be killed by the state no matter how you spin it
I’m sorry but why does whether or not an execution is sanctioned by the state matter in any way to you as a user of an anarchist instance? I genuinely cannot comprehend why that’s even a factor in your argument???
Again, if you can provide me with a quote and source where Charlie Kirk said Joe Biden should be “executed,” I will change my opinion on his assassination being justified.
No you won’t. You’ll just argue semantics like your dead nazi hero.
deleted by creator
The death penalty is the sentence. Execution is the act.
When someone is put to death by the state, the act itself is called an execution. They do it in a literal execution chamber.
Calling for the death penalty and calling for an execution mean the exact same thing.
Executions are state violence.
deleted by creator
Why list “trials, judges, reviews, juries, appeals” all of this as if it’s more than one thing that often times doesn’t work. Most of the convictions in the US are plea deals, they literally put you in a jail and tell you to say what they want or they’ll make things worse and the only way you can avoid this is to have money to make bail.
If your boss steals from your wages you have to jump through hoops to try and get it back and they don’t serve time. If you are accused of taking money from the company you are taken away by the state and put in jail till it can be proven you didn’t. You can’t expect me to trust that the system works in my favor when the system is clearly designed to not work in my favor.
deleted by creator
It’s not though.
deleted by creator
I’m fine without agreeing with you.
deleted by creator
And that’s why you’re standing up for Charlie Kirk’s call for execution.
“I want my political enemies killed,” versus “I want my political enemies killed by my political allies.”
Very nuanced.
Jesus F Christ… do you right-wingers ever remove your heads from your own arrses, like… ever?
deleted by creator
Prefer fascist?
deleted by creator
If you don’t want people to call you a fascist then stop acting like a fascist.
deleted by creator
execution and death penalty are synonyms
Removed by mod
Whatever he actually said (I don’t know) what is the meaningful difference between “death penalty” and “execute”?
How explicitly an institution is involved. Obviously makes it okay and nonviolent.
deleted by creator
Legal does not equal moral
deleted by creator
I think you mean “received a death penalty for his actions” instead of “assassination”.
so let’s break it down
execution is the killing part. it may be done by 3rd parties outside of the law (ie murder), or it could be the final part of a legal proceeding that leads to the death penalty
the death penalty is the conviction at the end of a legal proceeding
saying someone deserves the death penalty (ie jumping right to their conviction) skips the trial and sentencing etc of a normal legal proceeding. it’s not at all the same as saying someone should be tried for treason
he said that joe biden should be killed by the state no matter how you spin it
deleted by creator
You’d be hilarious as satire
In my opinion that distinction is paper thin, but you do you.
I’m sorry but why does whether or not an execution is sanctioned by the state matter in any way to you as a user of an anarchist instance? I genuinely cannot comprehend why that’s even a factor in your argument???
Because he’s a conservative sealioning.
deleted by creator
No you won’t. You’ll just argue semantics like your dead nazi hero.
Of all the hairs to split this was a pretty ridiculous one