• @CanadaPlusOP
      link
      English
      210 months ago

      Is that you’re opinion, or are you actually drawing from the article?

        • @CanadaPlusOP
          link
          English
          210 months ago

          In your opinion.

          In response to the one you just deleted: It’s not marketing, Nature is a scientific journal, and this is a review of approaches to measuring the presence or absence of such intelligence.

          • Dodecahedron December
            link
            fedilink
            English
            210 months ago

            That’s why I deleted it, bucko. Wrong person. Unrelated.

            It’s not my opinion, it’s fact. Spellcheckers and LLMs are not new. I’ve built a few of them. It isn’t intelligence. That’s not refutable.

            • @CanadaPlusOP
              link
              English
              2
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Spellcheckers are not LLMs. If you’ve built both, you should know that.