@CanadaPlus to Artificial Intelligence - Ethics | Law | Philsophy@lemmy.intai.techEnglish • 10 months agoA test of artificial intelligence - Naturewww.nature.comexternal-linkmessage-square6arrow-up13arrow-down10cross-posted to: technology@beehaw.org
arrow-up13arrow-down1external-linkA test of artificial intelligence - Naturewww.nature.com@CanadaPlus to Artificial Intelligence - Ethics | Law | Philsophy@lemmy.intai.techEnglish • 10 months agomessage-square6cross-posted to: technology@beehaw.org
minus-square@CanadaPlusOPlinkEnglish2•10 months agoIs that you’re opinion, or are you actually drawing from the article?
minus-square@CanadaPlusOPlinkEnglish2•10 months agoIn your opinion. In response to the one you just deleted: It’s not marketing, Nature is a scientific journal, and this is a review of approaches to measuring the presence or absence of such intelligence.
minus-squareDodecahedron DecemberlinkfedilinkEnglish2•10 months agoThat’s why I deleted it, bucko. Wrong person. Unrelated. It’s not my opinion, it’s fact. Spellcheckers and LLMs are not new. I’ve built a few of them. It isn’t intelligence. That’s not refutable.
minus-square@CanadaPlusOPlinkEnglish2•edit-210 months agoSpellcheckers are not LLMs. If you’ve built both, you should know that.
Is that you’re opinion, or are you actually drawing from the article?
It’s fact.
In your opinion.
In response to the one you just deleted: It’s not marketing, Nature is a scientific journal, and this is a review of approaches to measuring the presence or absence of such intelligence.
That’s why I deleted it, bucko. Wrong person. Unrelated.
It’s not my opinion, it’s fact. Spellcheckers and LLMs are not new. I’ve built a few of them. It isn’t intelligence. That’s not refutable.
Spellcheckers are not LLMs. If you’ve built both, you should know that.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator