• @CanadaPlusOP
    link
    English
    210 months ago

    Is that you’re opinion, or are you actually drawing from the article?

      • @CanadaPlusOP
        link
        English
        210 months ago

        In your opinion.

        In response to the one you just deleted: It’s not marketing, Nature is a scientific journal, and this is a review of approaches to measuring the presence or absence of such intelligence.

        • Dodecahedron December
          link
          fedilink
          English
          210 months ago

          That’s why I deleted it, bucko. Wrong person. Unrelated.

          It’s not my opinion, it’s fact. Spellcheckers and LLMs are not new. I’ve built a few of them. It isn’t intelligence. That’s not refutable.

          • @CanadaPlusOP
            link
            English
            2
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Spellcheckers are not LLMs. If you’ve built both, you should know that.