@CanadaPlus to Artificial Intelligence - Ethics | Law | Philsophy@lemmy.intai.techEnglish • 10 months agoA test of artificial intelligence - Naturewww.nature.comexternal-linkmessage-square6arrow-up13arrow-down10cross-posted to: technology@beehaw.org
arrow-up13arrow-down1external-linkA test of artificial intelligence - Naturewww.nature.com@CanadaPlus to Artificial Intelligence - Ethics | Law | Philsophy@lemmy.intai.techEnglish • 10 months agomessage-square6cross-posted to: technology@beehaw.org
minus-square@CanadaPlusOPlinkEnglish2•10 months agoIn your opinion. In response to the one you just deleted: It’s not marketing, Nature is a scientific journal, and this is a review of approaches to measuring the presence or absence of such intelligence.
minus-squareDodecahedron DecemberlinkfedilinkEnglish2•10 months agoThat’s why I deleted it, bucko. Wrong person. Unrelated. It’s not my opinion, it’s fact. Spellcheckers and LLMs are not new. I’ve built a few of them. It isn’t intelligence. That’s not refutable.
minus-square@CanadaPlusOPlinkEnglish2•edit-210 months agoSpellcheckers are not LLMs. If you’ve built both, you should know that.
In your opinion.
In response to the one you just deleted: It’s not marketing, Nature is a scientific journal, and this is a review of approaches to measuring the presence or absence of such intelligence.
That’s why I deleted it, bucko. Wrong person. Unrelated.
It’s not my opinion, it’s fact. Spellcheckers and LLMs are not new. I’ve built a few of them. It isn’t intelligence. That’s not refutable.
Spellcheckers are not LLMs. If you’ve built both, you should know that.