• Pennomi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    10 months ago

    The shitty thing about all this is that the products would be cheaper and more reliable if they didn’t have these features.

    • Iced Raktajino@startrek.websiteOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      Largely, yeah. Though i’m not sure about big screen TVs. Supposedly they’re sold at a loss and make up for it in ad sales, but not sure if they sell below cost to manufacture or just for less upfront profit (likely the latter)

      • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        They could give away the tvs if the damn things are running ads and make the money back in a month.

      • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Which is why I haven’t bought a new TV in about five years. I just buy old used TVs that have absolutely no new features on them and do not connect to anything.

  • Avicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 months ago

    “Bro I will send them just one more data about you bro and that’s it I promise bro”

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    The worst is thermostats, awhile back I stayed at a place for a month that had some kind of “smart” thermostat already connected to an account and it was programmed to “remember” when I change it and automatically schedule changes, with tons of things already on the schedule and I couldn’t change it because it was already attached to some dufus’ account. I had to hard reset the damn thing just to keep it from changing from cool to heat in the middle of the night. AND IT WAS MOTION SENSING, so it just wouldn’t run if nobody was home, putting the poor animals at risk.

    Stupid idiot device, more like.

    • Iced Raktajino@startrek.websiteOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      so it just wouldn’t run if nobody was home,

      I hate the “goes brrrr” thing, but “Frozen pipes in the winter go brrrrrr”

      • King_Bob_IV@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Most let you set a minimum/maximum temperature that it will never willingly cross. Keeps things like pets and pipes safe while not needing to have it be at optimal human temperature all the time. Most these settings are user adjustable.

        • Iced Raktajino@startrek.websiteOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I would have assumed that, but all these smart devices do not seem like they were designed by smart people lol.

          Still, I think I’ll stick with my “dumb” programmable thermostat.

  • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    The worst is when some devices require network access to function, as the only way to interact with them properly is via smart phone - robot vacuums come to mind.

    I am not knowledgeable enough to be able to prevent it from unauthorised access in and out, beyond blocking whatever domain ranges I find online.

    I really need to find time to take a network admin masterclass or similar…

    …especially if I intend to convince the missus to do a full Ubiquiti rollout in our house.

    • Iced Raktajino@startrek.websiteOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      The worst is when some devices require network access to function, as the only way to interact with them properly is via smart phone - robot vacuums come to mind.

      I try to do research ahead of time, but if that kind of “feature” slips past my due diligence, I just return it.

    • Jiggs@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Just a little advice. For devices you dont trust, dont go for specific blocking, but whitelist instead. Allow only whats neccesary.

      If you are not sure what that it and cant find it online, monitor it’s traffic for a bit and see what it tries to reach.

  • cm0002@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    “Just Say No…to Big Techs offerings, Say yes to open source and local API IoT appliances”

    FTFY

  • AeronMelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    This s why my wifi is a stealth SSID. Even my own devices can’t see it unless I explicitly tell them what it is.

  • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    In retrospect, the microwave probably also generates enough interference in the 2.4-ish gigahertz range to disconnect itself from the Wi-Fi when it’s running anyhow. Genius plan, there. Mine certainly poleaxes any Wi-Fi or Bluetooth connections within a couple of feet of itself whenever it’s cooking.

    Maybe that’s the real reason everyone wants us to be so keen on 5 GHz.