• connaisseur@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s interesting to see Apple fighting the EU’s regulatory bodies while complying with everything that the Chinese government asks.

    This.

  • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    7 months ago

    If a certain feature requires a privacy violation, there’s something clearly wrong with the way it was designed.

  • PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    7 months ago

    So, the $3 trillion dollar company can’t afford compliance lawyers to help them ship these features in time? The 30% of iPhone owning Europeans are surely not being influenced to sway their governments to stop regulating US tech?

    • sanpo@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      7 months ago

      They can, but this way they can brainwash their customers into thinking it’s the big bad EU’s fault.

  • Matriks404@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I have no idea what kind of features they add in Android/iOS anyway. It’s not like I use my smartphone differently than in 2015.

  • Bjarne@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    There weren’t any worthwhile features since the app store dropped. /hj

  • atro_city@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Malus’s official stance is that the DMA isn’t designed to protect customers, but to favor companies instead, sometimes European ones.

    Then they should be for it, because by their theory it favors them. But no, they’re so pro-consumer, they don’t want to make money /s