• @KaiReeve@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    911 year ago

    Bring back video games where the developers make them to be fun and players play them to have fun.

    Too many developers are in it for profit and too many players demand optimal competitive play.

    Sometimes I don’t want to conform to the min/max meta, Jason.

    • @GreenMario@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      331 year ago

      Been brought up before but the indie market still chugging along.

      Now if you want big expensive AAA “bring my RTX / i9 I spent too much money on to it’s very knees” with that, that’s impossible. Besides, poor optimization will put that stupid expensive rig to the test 😂

    • @Caboose12000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      301 year ago

      it sounds like you’re sleeping on indie games. I haven’t cared about AAA games in years bc of the things you mentioned, but there’s thousands of amazing and super high quality indie games out there that are made as passion projects from devs who just want people to have fun. the barrier to entry for becoming a game dev has been steadily lowering since the 80’s, almost anyone can make a game now so there’s really no reason to rely on giant game corporations as your only source

      • @MashedTech@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        Honestly, I got the Xbox and I mostly play indie games on Xbox game pass. And I have had such an amazing time with them. And if I want to play a triple A game I can probably find a used disc somewhere pretty cheap. Indie games are awesome. I loved Hoa, cried so much at the end.

        • @Torvum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          I legitimately think they just mean publishers and board shareholders. Most (read most, there are also plenty of devs with retard level hot takes on twitter about their constituents, and their clear jealousy of a better product) devs hate the features they have to implement.

        • @yata@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          This isn’t about somebody “trying to eat”. Devs are being paid by the publishers either way (until they get fired of course). Monetisation and “games as a live service” are implemented to increase profit for shareholders. Gamepublishing is already the largest entertainment industry, so this is just about adding more profits to already extreme profits.

    • @lea@mlem.lea.moe
      link
      fedilink
      161 year ago

      This month had two great releases in that regard, Baldur’s Gate 3 and Bomb Rush Cyberfunk. Labor of love games are real and on the rise.

      • It’s been happening for so long that if a developer gets into bed with one of the big publishers then they should know what’s going to happen.

    • @Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Pretty sure there are way more games now than they’re ever has been. Look outside the major publishers. Any big company is going to be in it for the money. That’s their main goal.

        • Yep. I know people love to idolize FDR, but the way he got the New Deal passed was with the argument that it was the “bare minimum we have to do to ensure that socialism doesn’t take root in the US for at least another 70 years.” Which is why the politicians started trying to revoke those promises the day after it passed.

    • @seitanic
      link
      221 year ago

      Fear of communism has fucked up the US in so many ways. Before the 80s, it was McCarthyism and putting “In God We Trust” on our money.

      • Stalin was ruthless, not stupid. He would have looked at the existing barriers and realized that it would be a waste of resources to try to build a wall in the middle of a desert.

  • @GreenMario@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    491 year ago

    Wolfenstein The New Order: Nice! Killing knot-zees like it’s 1992!!

    Wolfenstein II The New Collosus: what is this woke anti American shit/why can’t we play as the real “good” guys

    Gee. Somewhere between the release of these two games public opinion changed. The first came out in 2014, btw. The second’s ad campaign had “Make America Nazi Free Again” as a slogan, something that id thought we’d all agree. Nazis were in that safe group of “enemies we can slaughter without guilt” alongside aliens, zombies and robots.

    • Melkath
      link
      fedilink
      241 year ago

      I got banned from reddit for saying: Wolfenstein The New Order is one of if not the best game of all time, the only good nazi is a dead nazi. GET HYPED!

      I mean, I’m happy they had an implosion, but it should have been because of the nazi sympathy, not because of their api.

      • @GreenMario@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        Getting banned for being a Basterd is a badge of honor my good person.

        BJ Blazkowicz wants his scalps.

      • Maeve
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Well one cost “the right people” more money than they were willing to give and one didn’t. It’s almost like money doesn’t matter until it matters to the gawd, it sounds crazy to say it, it’s so dystopian, shadow governments’ corporate overlords. Lives otoh… shudder

    • @samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      191 year ago

      New Colossus came out in 2017. We all know what happened that made being a fascist piece of shit mainstream.

    • @seitanic
      link
      61 year ago

      The second’s ad campaign had “Make America Nazi Free Again” as a slogan

      Gee, that wouldn’t happen to be a poke at a particular presidential campaign?

      • @GreenMario@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        It can only piss off Nazi sympathizers tbh. I mean If you believed that America was going downhill and wanted to make it “great again” surely making it Nazi Free would be part of that goal right?

        Unless… 🤔

      • @GreenMario@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        LOL you ain’t wrong. It’s definitely very hard for what it is. I beat it in the Normal equivalent and had fun.

    • HubertManne
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      when it comes to woke its not what you see. But what you not see.

  • @CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    401 year ago

    I would love old school arcades. I feel like, most people today just don’t know what a wonderful place they used to be.

    No stupid toys to win. No tickets. No tokens or any virtual currency.

    Most games were a quarter with some of the larger ones being two quarters. You just hung out, played games, met new people, got to experience a wide range of games from shooters, side scroller fighters, sports, etc.

    It was truly magical. Was one of the best things at the mall.

  • @ph00p@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    33
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This entire “ANTI-WOKE” is just some bullshit that the most ignorant bigots hide behind thinking they can be as fucking awful as they want to be.

    They’ve even brought back anti-gay with the anti-trans thing under the old “THINK OF THE CHILDREN” banner which is pure bullshit.

    It really seemed for a good 10-15 years that that shit was conquered.

    These morons hide their racism by scoffing at anything with a non-white person in it with the label “POC”.

    The funniest thing is, they think their fucking clever and they use 1950’s housefrau shit like “DENGENERATE” and other outmoded bullshit words.

    They make fun of the left for being triggered by their own shadows(which does happen) but these morons are scared of anything not white and not straight, it’s really awful but kind of funny in a sick way.

    • Maeve
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      It’s almost like a spectrum with anything outside what I’m comfortable with is where I draw the line, especially if I’m dabbling or experimenting with anything that makes me vaguely uncomfortable, because what I’d people get the wrong idea that I’m “that,” isn’t it? The slider moves, everyone!

    • in Germany the inflationary use of “Nazi” by leftists weakened the term a lot

      Excited to hear more about the big leftist media outlets that have dominated Germany for the last sixty years.

    • @SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I agree it used to mean actual, armband wearing, genocide creating, goose stepping evil people that started WWII.

      Yes today there are still people who somehow support that shit with the books, flags, tats and armbands to prove it. There is a term for it. Neo Nazi. If you want Nazis to punch these are it, though it might not make them any less of one.

      Now by that standard is Trump a Nazi? No. But some throw the term around to essentially mean group=bad. The left crazies do it with nazi, the right crazies do it with communism. Over time it loses meaning to the point where nobody takes it seriously. Boy who cried wolf. The way to stop that is to only use the term on the real people, not the kinda sorta if you squint your eyes it’s similar in a way people. Not to say they they aren’t assholes or don’t deserve to be called out by other terms…

      Anyway yes people hate the real deal Nazis, but probably not every group someone on twitter slaps that label on to. End rant.

      • Trump may not be a Nazi or a Neo-Nazi, as those are extremely specific subsets of Fascism. Trump is an authoritarian fascist. His TV series proved that well before his second or third presidential campaign.

        • @SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          I agree. But he’s also not “actual Hitler” as many have said over the years. It’s different levels of asshole and I wish people had more nuance is my point

          • Maeve
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            Idk, he wanted to order the military to go in with weapons blazing at blm protesters. Defended those who marched and chanted in Charlottesville that “Jews! Will not! Replace us!”

            He may not have the name hitler, but he seems to love that stuff. Oh yeah and covered up (has something to do with?) Kashoggi being quartered, alive when he himself couldn’t listen to the tapes of the sounds of agony. What exactly would earn him “Nazi” status, in your view?

      • Maeve
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        It’s almost as if there’sa term for right wing authoritarianism/authoritarianism, isn’t it?

    • Similer circumstance in russia. Where everyone bad and aganist russia is a nazi. Ukraine needing dezafication. Etc since from their perspective its only ever been Nazi’s they had no red scare since they were the red scare

    • @MartinXYZ@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      Also terms like “grammar Nazi” is helping to weaken the seriousness of the word.

      In Denmark people sometimes use it to say that somebody is quite particular about something (similar to “grammar Nazi”) like " yeah, he’s kinda Nazi about people not wearing shoes in his apartment" I don’t know if that’s common in other countries too? But it’s definitely weakening the gravity of the word 'nazi".

    • @Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      -11 year ago

      And I’m here wondering if Godwin’s idea came because he saw something like this and wanted to stop it or if he saw an opportunity to silence criticism of Nazi-like strategies.

      And I’m not sure if I should be happy or sad that we’re in a post-Godwin world now. On the one hand, it was a dumb “rule” because there’s certainly times where Nazi comparisons are apt. But on the other hand, we only got post-Godwin because Nazi ideas have regained enough popularity that some are openly embracing the label.

    • ineedaunion
      link
      fedilink
      -2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I see facist pedophiles who are also extremely racist against non whites daily in Montana. Is that a Nazi?

    • @OceanSoap@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      -91 year ago

      It’s exactly the same here in the US. Anyone right of Bernie Sandars was called a Nazi for a few years there (happens less today, but still happens), so now when someone shouts nazi, everyone just rolls their eyes.

      • Schadrach
        link
        81 year ago

        I don’t roll my eyes, I just ask what precisely they mean when they say Nazi, and usually precisely what they mean by whatever word they use in that response with a flexible definition. Because it could literally be anything between “murder anyone who isn’t straight, white and Christian” and “not as progressive as Biden”.

          • Schadrach
            link
            41 year ago

            I mean, he essentially campaigned and won on not being Trump. He’s been competent enough in office though.

            “Inoffensively competent” is about the highest praise I’d give him, and it’s deeply sad that that’s a substantial improvement over his predecessor.

            I’ll give Trump that not everything he did in office was terrible - he did sign the FIRST STEP Act which was broadly a good thing, and I approved of the Devos Title IX policy changes, and that’s about it.

        • Maeve
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Biden isn’t progressive. He’s kind of socially left and economically right.

      • @Jax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        Ramifications of failures from education systems throughout the U.S.

        Can’t be surprised that no one articulates themselves properly when the only things most of these people read are less than 150 characters at a time.

      • Didn’t Chris Matthews have a meltdown during the 2020 primaries when Bernie won Nevada, because he thought the DSA was going to round people up and execute them in Central Park?

      • Maeve
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        It also happens the other way: Sanders, Cortez are called socialists, and even refer to themselves as socialist. Neither are anything of the sort.

  • Image Transcription:

    X/Twitter post by user Eric Alper @ThatEricAlpher reading: What thing from your teenage years do you think should make a comeback?

    Reply by user Geraldine @everywhereist reading: The prevailing belief that Nazis are bad.

    [I am a human, if I’ve made a mistake please let me know. Please consider providing alt-text for ease of use. Thank you. 💜]

    • Bipta
      link
      fedilink
      241 year ago

      No one relevant is pro-Nazi openly… they’re just quiet when it comes to being anti-Nazi. It’s not meaningfully different when you’re in leadership and have Nazis looking up to you.

        • @xanu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          91 year ago

          The caption isn’t “the prevailing belief that it’s okay to be a Nazi”. there are influential people in politics and social media that are open about being a Nazi (or at least poorly veiled dog whistles and a general agreement with Nazi rhetoric) and being openly anti-Nazi causes harassment and being called a groomer.

          “Nazis are bad” is no longer a prevailing belief. it’s still the majority opinion, but now there are “discussions” about the imaginary merits of Nazism and a rapidly growing population openly identifying with the term.

        • Maeve
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          That’s not true. I see everyone around me promoting a lifestyle and ethics as desirable while on the dl living the lifestyle they decay. Which leads me to the conclusion it’s often not about what a thing actually is, but whether i can get orders to play the game of “it plausibly looks like x when it’s definitely y, upon closer examination, but no one cares as long as they can plausibly say it’s x when it’s most definitely y.

    • @letsgocrazy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      -51 year ago

      And he was clearly having a severe manic episode that people conveniently forgot, becuse mobs can’t handle nuance.

        • @letsgocrazy@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          01 year ago

          I love how I got downvoted for saying “mobs can’t handle nuance”.

          Obviously someone considers themselves part of a mob and was offended. 🤔

          • @Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            41 year ago

            You’re getting downvoted because you’re arguing that being in some sort of manic episode excuses that shit.

            Admittedly I don’t pay much attention to him, so I could be wrong, but I don’t think he’s tried to walk any of that back since then either.

            • @letsgocrazy@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              I know I am.

              I also know the people who are doing it have no fucking idea what they are talking about.

  • Queen HawlSera
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’d like this AND “Getting banned from a website requires you to draw unnecessary attention to yourself through misbehavior”

    Yes I am STILL salty about the Reddit ban!

    • @3laws@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      Don’t worry, this is only your FIRST ban in this beautiful and blessed Web 3.0 landscape. 😀

    • Schadrach
      link
      31 year ago

      Most of my bans from Reddit subs were for things like posting on a different sub or my favorite “egregious immorality” (mostly because that one was from a sub you wouldn’t expect it from).

  • @Porcupine
    link
    10
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    An overall disdain for anything too trendy or popular.

    My teenage family members live and die by the trend cycle. Teenagers have always cared about what’s cool, but now the trend cycle is so fast it’s impossible to keep up without spending inordinate amounts of money and generating tons of waste. It also just doesn’t seem great for their self-esteem.

    I was a teen in the mid-2000s/early 2010s hipster Tumblr era, which of course came with its own issues. But at least the trend cycle took a few years, and if anything I liked was unpopular I could just roll my eyes and say it’s just too obscure for you normies to understand.

    • BitOneZero @ .world
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I wouldn’t be concerned about trending itself, it’s that people seem to be favoring trends that are objectively bad. The pandemic people kept saying it wasn’t real and would go away when summer of 2020 came… but that proved wrong, and so few seem to want to learn from the lesson of going against science in favor of Fox News or whatever other negative trend that crowds keep following. If we were trending towards building affordable houses for more people and sheltering the homeless and not making rent lock people into jobs they don’t want - I’d thing it was progress. But right now, the crowds seem to be flocking to some negative-oriented Nazi kind of shit.

      • @Porcupine
        link
        41 year ago

        I respectfully disagree. Yes crazies are getting crazier and louder, but overall more young people are trending left – and further left – than ever. I don’t think bigotry is particularly cool or trendy to most teenagers.

        • BitOneZero @ .world
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          Yes crazies are getting crazier and louder

          It isn’t just their words, since 2014 they believe all kinds of wild things, and the pandemic was just one example of how they act out on these belief as business owners, neighbors, organizations. It isn’t just politics.