• 825 Posts
  • 2.11K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 11th, 2023

help-circle
  • “Schedule 5 has very serious implications,” Ms Shearer said. “This measure gives government officials power to strip benefits received through the social security and family payments system from a person subject to an arrest warrant, even though that person has not been convicted of any offence.”

    Wtf, what a gem!

    Why is everyone so hell bent on neglecting the fundamental tenets on which a peaceful, and prosperous Australia relies.

    Do these politicians not understand the moral and practical principles behind due process and presumption of innocence?












  • Pretty much agree with other people’s comments here.

    For my State community, this has been accounted for in the name of the Perth/Western Australia community. To make it clear the community is for the city and the State.

    Maybe its different in a city like Perth, but too many people are invested in both the country and the city for it to make sense that they have different communities for what is essentially different parts of their life.

    It also has the added benefit of attempting to narrow the country-metro divide that news organisations promote through their different programming decisions. They’re limited by broadcast space in a day, a community on Aussie.zone is limited by the server capacity Lodion has organised, in other words we could afford a lot of varied posts different demographics would find interesting under the one banner.









  • Yeah, na. You’re not taking the time to understand the heirarchy in place exactly to mitigate the confusion about what really constitutes a country of origin.

    So below is the country of origin standards from competition and consumer law act 2010 (cth)


    On page 8-9 of the Australian Made, Australian Grown (amag) code of practice you’ll see they basically refer to the definitions of country of origin set out in the table in section 255 of the Act (screenshot above). Along with some examples of what is not considered ‘substantial transformation’.

    https://australianmade.com.au/media/51704/amag-code-of-practice-july-2011.pdf


    The Australian Made, Australian Grown campaign is and always will be linked to the Federal Government, meaning any owners (Currently a non-profit run by the Australian Chamber of Commerce network) have to meet certain requirements including upholding the campaigns authoritive acceptance.

    https://australianmade.com.au/why-buy-australian-made/history-of-australian-made/


    I think a lot of Australians haven’t taken the time to understand how country of origin works in Australian consumer law. Basically ‘made in’ is a lower standard to meet, than ‘product of’ or ‘grown in’. With the lower expectations of ‘made in’ set right in people’s minds I think a lot of confusion could be avoided.

    Maybe easier/graphical explanations of this aspect could form part of your buy Oceanian project?






  • Sydney Town Hall was a poor choice or a good choice then? To you.

    Look, we’re in protest positioning and tactics here. Its essential for the scope of ways to protest be necessarily broad, to allow for the creativity that often accompanies effective protests. You seem to be arguing for a quite narrow definition of allowable/effective protest, and we’re just going to have to agree to disagree.

    Just stop oil with the paint in the museums et al; Rosa Parks on the bus; Japanese Bus drivers refusing money; Palestine Action Group over the harbour bridge. They’re all acceptable and creative forms of protest to me. Whether they’re effective isn’t the point, the point is we have a society built to accept and accomodate the fact that humanity isn’t a monolith.