• @mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42 hours ago

    I swear this is almost trying to parody the title of the article about the 19 year old who was burned alive

  • @PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    297 hours ago

    You would think it would be easy to find some poor conscript fuck who didn’t run over civilians in a bulldozer struggling with the fact that they were coerced into being part of a genocide, but no, CNN goes with the guy who crushed human beings. Even as attempted hasbara, that’s some high-level incompetence in CNN.

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]
    link
    fedilink
    62
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    In the aughts, once the US torture programs started getting public attention around 2003, I did my obsessive thing on the German Reich and the Holocaust.

    During Operation Barbarossa, the SS was experimenting with eradication methods. The most common was the pogrom, endorsing the locals to massacre the undesirables. When they weren’t undesirable enough or it was the whole village, the einsatzgruppen (death squads) had to come do it, usually forcing them to dig a mass grave and then executing them along the side.

    It was messy and brutal and gross, and there was high turnover among the death squads (the US has a similar problem with its combat drone operators). And this was a major problem.

    The SS experimented with other ideas, including deathwagons that would pipe the vehicle’s exhaust into an enclosed chamber to kill dozens at a time, but even that was too harsh and too slow.

    This is how the prototype genocide machine was made at Auschwitz. The program was contrived so no one who interacted with the live prisoners also interacted with the dead corpses. The guy who pushed the execute button was two persons removed in the chain of command from the guy who signed off on the execution order, and none of those people had to face the prisoners or the outcome. The point specifically was to make the process of massacre less stressful for the people involved.

      • @Benjaben@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        226 hours ago

        It’s funny, I had the opposite reaction, I see this as pretty strong evidence of our decency. It’s really, really hard to get most people to behave this way, and the ones who do wind up fucked up from it (as they should).

  • @DavidGarcia@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    9310 hours ago

    reminds me of this bit:

    “not only will america go to your country and kill all your people but they’ll come back 20 years later and make a movie about how killing your people made their soldiers feel sad.”

  • @Sundial@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    19213 hours ago

    The last sentence is fucked up. If you’re running over hundreds of people how in the fuck do you know they are terrorists. These people are intentionally and knowingly committing war crimes then come back home and cry about how this all made them so sad.

    • @drolex@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      8313 hours ago

      If the IDF is killing people, then they are terrorists. Not the other way around. You are to be checked for antisemitism/glorification of terrorism. Please report to your nearest IDF bulldozer.

    • Snot Flickerman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6413 hours ago

      Ask Rachel Corrie, who was similarly run over by a bulldozer protecting Palestinian land. It’s been over 20 years and the US still doesn’t give a single shit about Israel murdering it’s own citizens.

      • @Sundial@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        5012 hours ago

        Yeah I remember reading about her. She was an incredibly brave woman. The most horrifying part was reading about the IDF soldiers who had a pancake party to mock her death.

    • @Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      2811 hours ago

      Look at how well Israeli propaganda is working abroad. Now imagine how well it must be working on the israeli population.

  • Chloé 🥕
    link
    fedilink
    6112 hours ago

    i sincerely hope his actions haunt him for the rest of his pathetic life

    • @d00ery@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      25
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      I’m pretty sure they did.

      Six months after he was first sent to fight, he was struggling with post-traumatic stress disorder […] Before he was due to redeploy, he took his own life.

      • @Fosheze@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        147 minutes ago

        Wait… He crushed HUNDREDS of people with a bulldozer in less than 6 months‽ What the actual fuck.

      • The Octonaut
        link
        fedilink
        128 hours ago

        Too cowardly to do anything useful to make amends. Just let another conscript fill his space.

        Brave enough to drive over Palestinians and call them “terrorists in their hundreds”. Not brave enough to stand up to criticism from his countrymen. This is what spending billions of dollars on an asymmetrical war gets you: a system in which the weakest people can still take the lives of hundreds before being thrown away themselves.

    • @Tyfud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      38
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Indoctrination is a hell of a drug.

      Not saying these guys should be absolved, but they’re doing this because they think they’re the good guys/helping out.

      We should be lamblasting their leadership and all of Israel’s parliament that’s enabling this.

      But sometimes, soldiers are just soldiers/grunts. US Soldiers have similar PTSD after Afghanistan and Iraq. Not absolving them of sins, but when you’re trained for most of your adult life to take orders and not question them, and then those orders include killing innocents, it’s difficult to break from the indoctrination/control a group has had over you in the moment. Usually it’s not until you’re finished with your tour and you’re back home and had time to decompress that you realize the horrors you witnessed and perpetuated.

      Again, not justifying it in any way, but if we don’t humanize Israeli soldiers, we run the risk of turning them into boogeymen like we did the Nazis. They were human too, and by not acknowledging that and how far humanity can go when they are supporting nationalist movements, we do great harm to any attempt to catch and correct these sort of things early.

      There’s no switch that gets flipped that turns people into monsters. The worst atrocities ever committed upon humanity were by other humans. We need to acknowledge that they’re all human, or we risk repeating history.

      • @MellowYellow13@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        10
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        They made a choice, do not absolve people of what they are doing and continue to do, especially if it’s fucking genocide, that’s literally how these things happen as well as the Holocaust.

        At some point, people have to stand up and say no, voice their concerns, and just simply do the right thing.

        Literally read what you wrote, the world already did what you are scared about to the Palestinians and is continuing to do so, are you tone deaf?

        How about we fucking Humanize Palestine

        • @chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          27 hours ago

          I don’t think it’s either/or, having empathy for someone who killed himself because of the horrible things his country persuaded him to do doesn’t preclude having empathy for his victims, and it doesn’t mean absolving the crime. It is reality that everyone involved is victimized by war.

          the world already did what you are scared about to the Palestinians and is continuing to do so

          Part of how this was done is by using the emotional weight of atrocities for dehumanization of those claimed to be responsible. You might say that we don’t need to acknowledge the humanity of everyone universally, because the murderers have crossed a clear line by their own free will. But there is a concerted effort to obfuscate that line and drag everyone into plausible complicity; mandatory military service, suppression and murder of journalists, manipulative propaganda campaigns, it’s all effective and hardly anyone is genuinely immune.

          Which isn’t to say the framing in the OP article is right; saying slaughtering people like that is “difficult to accept”, “psychological trauma”, calling all the victims “terrorists”, makes what should be an issue of recognizing and reacting to injustice into a problem of medical treatment to get people to be ok with doing the evil things the state directs them to do. That’s more manipulative propaganda, and many people will be convinced by it. The simplest counter that is least subject to being twisted is the conviction that everyone is always human and should be treated with empathy, without exception.

        • @kmaismith@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          28 hours ago

          You are arguing for the dehumanization of the people of Israel. Dehumanizing the enemy is a reprehensible thing to do no matter the side no matter the conflict

          • @azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            56 hours ago

            How is “they are responsible for their own actions” dehumanizing? If anything the person you are responding to is arguing that IDF soldiers have free will.

            Do not buy into the “we didn’t know!!!1!” and “we were indoctrinated!!!” bullshit. This is the exact same bullshit that “former” nazis sympathizers peddled after the war. It’s a lie. A transparent one at that.

            Yes, the nazis’ methods of dehumanization were very effective. But that does not, for even a femtosecond, absolve anyone of cold-bloodedly murdering a Jew (or a Palestinian). It didn’t happen on accident, that soldier got in that position through a long series of conscious choices, and it came down to it he chose to run over hundreds of people from the comfort of his bulldozer. That is both very human, and one of the most unspeakable crimes of hate. Human in all the worst ways our species has ever devised.

            Some crimes are just beyond forgiveness, because it isn’t in anyone’s power to forgive. Killing hundreds in an act of genocide is one such crime. To be human is many things, but being owed forgiveness is not one of them.

            I’m sorry for the emotional message, I am assuming you are playing devil’s advocate in good faith but I can’t just let the dehumanization of innocent murdered civilians be compared to the harsh condemnation of the soldiers who killed them.

  • @yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    7213 hours ago

    One of the reasons for creating the system of death camps was that Nazi soldiers and policemen tasked with murdering Jewish people and other undesirables had elevated rates of PTSD. Also, during the Cultural Revolution, the People’s liberation Army switched to a lower caliber sidearm because all the executions were giving them carpel tunnel.

    You don’t want to loose sight of humanity just because you’re committing atrocity.

    • Nougat
      link
      fedilink
      3613 hours ago

      I know that another driving force for the gas chambers was to preserve ammunition.

      The earliest versions of gas chambers were essentially “piping truck exhaust into a building.” They moved on from that in order to preserve metal (from the piping), fuel, and vehicles for other purposes.

      • @some_guy
        link
        613 hours ago

        I think they were using vans or buses, not filling buildings with carbon monoxide. Smaller spaces.

        • Nougat
          link
          fedilink
          612 hours ago

          Maybe? I know for sure they were doing piping into a building early on.

        • rand_alpha19
          link
          fedilink
          112 hours ago

          That doesn’t seem very efficient if you want to gas dozens of people at once, which happened many times.

            • rand_alpha19
              link
              fedilink
              -17 hours ago

              They did it throughout the war and not merely at the start? So weird that there’s photographic and video evidence of people being gassed in buildings then.

              Edit - Here’s evidence that the Germans used chambers (often called “showers”) from 1941 onwards:

              https://www.theholocaustexplained.org/the-camps/types-of-camps/ https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/gassing-operations

              While I’m sure vans were still used for their mobility/convenience and in cases where not many people were to be executed, Germany created extermination camps specifically to kill people (in more ways than just gassing) and those locations contained constructed buildings meant for execution with gas, not vans.

              Even a few concentration camps had their own gas chambers, which were not vans, that were used to execute people that could no longer do forced labour.

  • @9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    44
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    I’m actually speechless.

    I hope this guy suffers until his end.

    If you run over HUNDREDS with a BULLDOZER, you deserve permanent PTSD to prevent you from ever fucking thinking of doing anything remotely like it again