• originalucifer
    link
    fedilink
    793 months ago

    weird how the state that claims ultimate patriotism and likes to talk about ‘muh freedoms’ and all those ‘dont tread on me’ flags spends so much of its purposefully, very limited legislature time taking away peoples rights.

    ‘patriotic’

    • @Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      163 months ago

      Luke 10:19 Behold, I have given you authority to tread on serpents and scorpions, and over all the power of the enemy, and nothing shall hurt you.

      Tread all you want, Bible says so.

      • @BranBucket@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        153 months ago

        Supervise your kid while they’re on the internet. Install nanny filters on their phone and computer. Monitor who they hang out with. If you can’t handle raising your kid, you should have thought of that before having them.

          • @BranBucket@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            -33 months ago

            Sure they do. Just don’t have sex. Then you won’t have kids and won’t have to worry about them seeing porn on the internet.

            It’s simple, if you’re not responsible enough to keep your kid off PornHub, you’re not responsible enough to have sex. =P

      • @BleatingZombie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        83 months ago

        I don’t like my children watching anything violent, so you can’t watch action movies anymore

        My aunt is allergic to peanuts, so you can’t eat them anymore

        My uncle is racist, so you can’t be black anymore

        Where does it end?

  • @some_guy
    link
    363 months ago

    You vote for dipshits, you have to subscribe to a vpn service to whack off. It’s the circle of life.

  • @UnixWeeb@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    203 months ago

    The initial pitch will require ID to access porn but then it’ll branch out to any site that hosts NSFW content. Before you know it, every website you access will end up having your internet activities directly tied to you via your ID, and they can further use that data to train whatever models they got cookin up next.

      • @MyNamesNotRobert@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        4
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I think banning vpns like several borderline dictatorships have is still a little far fetched. This would have a negative impact on companies who use them who are the ones that tell congress what to do. Although they could always make it so that large corporations can get certain exceptions and legally using a vpn is just a matter of how much money they fork over to the fcc for a license or something.

        It’s currently illegal to transmit encrypted data over most non-2.4Ghz radio frequencies unless you’re a telecommunication company. No one even cares enough to get mad about this. I imagine they’d eventually reuse whatever playbook they used to accomplish this.

        • Goku
          link
          fedilink
          13 months ago

          So if I use my cell network to visit SSL website I’m breaking the law?

          • @MyNamesNotRobert@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Telecommunication companies have special licensing that allows them to offer mobile data without following all the same rules they would otherwise have to follow if they used different frequencies. Cell phone network data isn’t regulated the same as other frequencies.

            If you wirelessly access an SSL website over an amateur packet radio system, you are breaking the law. Almost no one ever does this but it’s still bullshit that it’s not allowed.

      • yeehaw
        link
        fedilink
        13 months ago

        Good luck. This would be a tough one to enforce.

      • @werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        33 months ago

        I want to! But it just doesn’t pay enough. I’m going to have to turn to directing high quality porn when I’m in my 60s. Probably remote work. Meanwhile I need to keep sharpening my directing skills by watching proper examples and analyzing them.

  • I can only assume hundreds of thousands of mostly young female actresses rely on pornhub for their income stream. And people think Republicans don’t have a women problem.

    • Wild Bill
      link
      fedilink
      -23 months ago

      You think these women look forward to coming into work?

    • @BranBucket@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      43 months ago

      The rest of us shouldn’t have our freedoms restricted because of irresponsible parenting. You’d think people who place such a premium on personal responsibility wouldn’t need the government to help them raise their kids.

    • Plenty of unhealthy things we don’t age restrict. Although I look at porn more than I eat hamburgers nobody would stop me from eating one every day, and I’ll be dead from eating hamburgers way before I die of porn.

    • @DancingBear@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      33 months ago

      Porn is normal and healthy and has been around since before humans had language.

      Jerking off may make you as a parent feel uncomfortable but that does not make porn unhealthy.

        • @DancingBear@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Any psychiatrist who claims to diagnose porn addiction is engaging in malpractice.

          Porn addiction is not real according to sexual scientists.

          The problem is religion and fake morality creating conflicts in people’s minds because they don’t realize that masturbation is fine and healthy.

          The problem is religion, not porn.

          Period.

          None of what you said is scientifically accurate.

          Porn addiction is a religious issue because religion has fucked people’s heads.

          The only thing people with so called porn addiction share in common is a religion that teaches sex is immoral.