• KiG V2
      link
      fedilink
      571 year ago

      Gulags were prisons. And they were, in many ways, more humane and rehabilitation-focused than any Western prisons. This is scratching the surface of the issue.

      The real issue is you not bothering to fathom that the capitalists will fight tooth and nail, including psychologically, to stop the rise of the singular ideology that threatens their millenia of power.

      • KiG V2
        link
        fedilink
        351 year ago

        I understand that there is a mountain of propaganda convincing you that Stalin was evil, but literally name one thing supposedly wrong witb LENIN. Nothing, not even the usual CIA and Nazis could be bothered to make up stories about him.

        You are operating under the assumption of, “well, all the people around me say these people are evil, so, they must be!”

          • In case people are still reading this thread, Kronstadt were Whites (not the skin kind, the White army). Some at Kronstadt called themselves anarchists but the group otherwise committed pogroms and was fighting for the White army. Not that OP really cared, all he wanted was to attribute something to Lenin to criticize him for.

          • comrade-bear
            link
            fedilink
            61 year ago

            What I have to say is to point you towards the Dessalines git post and ask you to find the issues with his sources or his statements wikipedia is not an unbiased or in depth source, look at the primary sources of your information who they were how they got that information. Like Dessalines looked at it and countered it with good sources now you are pointing back at the target of the Dessalines criticism without even acknowledging the criticism. I have no problems with disagreement, as long as its in good faith but you glossing over and huge documentation of criticism and just repeating your point cause Wikipedia says so does not look like good faith

      • ButtigiegMineralMap
        link
        fedilink
        9
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Also in an average year of the gulag, about 40 percent of prisoners were released, meaning sentences weren’t long

      • @cloud@lazysoci.al
        link
        fedilink
        -521 year ago

        Can’t you see that you are pretty much doing psyop yourself? There’s no such thing as a good dictator. Stalin isn’t good because they sentenced to dead less political prisoners than the Tsar or Hitler. They are all shit. Do not worship a dictator.

        • ∞🏳️‍⚧️Edie [it/its]
          link
          fedilink
          37
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          [Genie meme]

          You: I wish [“tankies”, or whatever else you want to call us] stopped worshiping dictators.

          Genie: Granted

          You: Nothing changed.

          Genie: Correct.

          fucking liberals

          I understand that you can’t understand our comments. I mean, if you did, you’d realise we don’t worship anyone.

          But… damn, you can’t even read the image in the post.

        • @Beat_da_Rich@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          271 year ago

          You can find plenty of communist criticisms of Stalin. They appear on this forum from time to time.

          Maybe try engaging earnestly and give specifics. You may get even more context from us that might change your view. Or, hell, we might even agree with you. Stalin did good things. He also did some shit things.

          Instead, you’re relying off of the Stalin boogeyman myth that even the US government has admitted is false.

        • KiG V2
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          The CIA admitted they invented the hogwash about Stalin being a dictator, and admitted he was merely the “captain of a team.”

          The only reason we think of him as a “dictator” here in the West is because anybody that has resisted the West’s demands for total prostration is a “dictator.” If you want examples of REAL dictators you should look to all of the right-wing egotistic maniacs the U.S. government sponsored from centuries past to the present.

          There is a difference between a “dictator” who kills fascists, capitalists, monarchists, slavers and saboteurs trying to actively destroy a system that is saving and uplifting hundreds of millions of lives, and an ACTUAL dictator who kills twice that number in women, children, socialists, racial minorities, sexual minorities, religious minorities, while plundering the country and essentially enslaving their own populace.

    • @MarlKarx@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      471 year ago

      “learn history” we did, you’re the one who should stop using wikipedia as source for controversial political topics

    • DankZedong
      link
      fedilink
      401 year ago

      NOT

      THE

      FUCKING

      WIKEPEDIA LINKS 😭😭😭

      I can’t with y’all anymore

      • @GaryLeChat@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        361 year ago

        Everybody knows that Wikipedia is literally unrefutable fact, especially on controversial or political topics. Why would someone lie or omit facts on the internet??? Next you’re going to tell me that I can’t trust CIA press releases too!!!

        • Everyone knows teachers love it when you use Wikipedia in school, it’s a real problem in some high schools because it’s a trick to get an easy A, if your teacher assigns you a topic for a paper you can just send them the wikipedia link for it and they’ll be forced to give you an A because you don’t actually need to do the work yourself in school

        • DankZedong
          link
          fedilink
          361 year ago

          Wikipedia is notoriously untrustworthy and gets brigades heavily by the CIA, especially on topics like this.

          For better sources, use this. Look for gulags and the purges you mention and see what is written.

            • @MarlKarx@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              271 year ago

              “babe wake up! The Dictator of a capitalist, imperialist country said that insert socialist has killed lots of people”

              • @DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                91 year ago

                I find this one fascinating. I’m trying to follow this thought process.

                “Stalin is an evil Russian Dictator! and these evil tankies worship him! Putin is also an evil Russian Dictator therefore these evil tankies will agree with anything he says because they like Russian Dictators!

                This person honestly seems to think solely in terms of “sports team politics” and doesn’t seem to understand that people can believe or not believe something based on evidence, not on what “their team” says is true.

                • @MarlKarx@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  271 year ago

                  bro you cannot be serious…“hmm why would putin and his oligarchic bros spread misinformation about socialism” dont tell me you’re one of those liberals who think russia is still socialist

                • @Aria@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  211 year ago

                  Not getting guillotined. Why are libs completely incapable of empathising with people acting in self-serving ways? If the Russian youth are educated on the benefits of a revolution, they’ll want a revolution. If they’re told maintaining the status quo is for everyone’s benefit, they’ll want to keep the status quo where Putin is rich and headed.

                • DankZedong
                  link
                  fedilink
                  161 year ago

                  You could ask the same question about the CIA or the counter revolutionary forces around the world or the Western press. Why is it that people who are part of the bourgeoisie do their best to discredit socialists efforts? Socialist theorists would say it is to distract the working class from looking beyond capitalism, creating an imaginary enemy in the alternative option that is socialism.

                • @Buchenstr@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  131 year ago

                  His disdain for the soviet union, which he regularly discusses.

                  I am sorry are you believing in putin’s words now? Ok russiabot

                • @cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  91 year ago

                  All bourgeois leaders and especially those in post-socialist countries have a vested interest in denigrating and slandering the political and economic system of the Soviet Union because that is the best way to prevent a resurgence of enthusiasm for socialism which is a threat to their power and the capitalist system they have built.

            • @PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              25
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Gee, what would capitalist system, existing only because the previous one was brutally and unlawfully destroyed against the will of the peopl, gain on smearing that previous system.

              For a culture and civilisation supposedly build on Roman roots westerners awfully rarily seem to ask fundamental question of “qui bono?”.

            • @cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              141 year ago

              It’s bullshit no matter who says it - and especially a notorious anti-communist liberal like Putin - because it’s simply not borne out by the evidence.

          • @cloud@lazysoci.al
            link
            fedilink
            -291 year ago

            There’s just as much the CIA can patch, Wikipedia still provide a good account of famous historical events and plenty cross links, you can search for yourself and read the individual history of many who died on gulags or that got send there. Not even the CIA can spin history 360 degrees

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MKUltra

            If you have even better sources to wikipedia that’s good but your link redirect to reddit and vague articles and even to wikipedia itself

            • DankZedong
              link
              fedilink
              31
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              For starters you could read actual socialist theory but I know you won’t. If you’re truly acting in good faith, give youtuber Hakim a listen. Or The Deprogram podcast. Or Second Thought. They have various videos covering a multitude of starter* topics and they provide sources with their claims.

              Edit: if you’re looking for insights on how the CIA does spin history 180 degrees (360 is a circle, btw, you’d end up at the same point) then give The Jakarta Method a read.

    • SovereignState
      link
      fedilink
      English
      37
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Wikipedia links? Really?

      I’d get it if you came in like: buh whaddaboud diss?

      But nah, you accused us of worshipping these men and compared us to neonazis (btw the USSR ended the fucking holocaust and made antisemitism punishable by death).

      Do some self-reflection. You do not know what you are talking about in the slightest, and we do.

    • @CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.mlM
      link
      fedilink
      331 year ago

      Tell me sincerely, because I want to get into the mind of someone like you, do you really believe that wikipedia is a trustworthy source on literally anything? Like deep down, when you go fetch a wikipedia link, do you really think “yeah I’ll just link wikipedia then I won’t have to make a point myself”?

      • @cloud@lazysoci.al
        link
        fedilink
        -401 year ago

        Wikipedia is trustworthy enough for famous historical events, you won’t find write in it that the gulags weren’t real

        • Marxism-Fennekinism
          link
          fedilink
          English
          30
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          https://www.reuters.com/article/us-security-wikipedia-idUSN1642896020070816

          Even Western sources admit that the CIA and FBI meddles in it. Can’t imagine why they miiight want to smear the USSR and Stalin right? The agencies that created the Banana Republics in Latin America, used Agent Orange on Vietnamese villagers, suppressed any sort of socialist thought and imprisoned US socialists during the Red Scare despite accusing the USSR of suppressing thought in the exact same way and violating the 1st amendment of their own constitution, and gave us MK Ultra and other horribly unethical experiments done on unknowing and nonconsenting test subjects?

          • Anarcho-Bolshevik
            link
            fedilink
            English
            71 year ago

            how come u get to cite the cia calling him not a dictator

            but we dont get to cite wikipedia which the cia edits calling him 1

            huh

            its not fair

        • @Buchenstr@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          25
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          all of these sources come from western analysts during the cold war, all of whom belonged to western think tanks designed to propagate misinformation against communism.

          Your sources are inflated by people long dead and their relatives pump this same shit for you to consume. Gulags existed, so does labor camps in america, america also regularly massacred students and workers. And caused a silent famine to happen in the midwest, yet you scream communism to drown out any forms of alternative information you feel uncomfortable about.

    • @COMHASH@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      251 year ago

      Hey what did lenin do? He was a clean man and did nothing absolutely wrong. What did your founding father do? Genocide, colonialism, stealing lands from Mexico… Oh slavery, tons of slavery…

        • @cloud@lazysoci.al
          link
          fedilink
          -291 year ago

          You may want to read the biography of Marx and the historical events of the 19th century. Wikipedia offers a good recap and data for further reading.

          • DankZedong
            link
            fedilink
            341 year ago

            You could read actual works by Marx but it would require being able to read pages longer than a Wikipedia article.

            • @PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              12
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Franz Mehring wrote thick biography of Marx, he was direct witness of many events and knew even more participants. I must read it someday when i will have some time.

            • @cloud@lazysoci.al
              link
              fedilink
              -331 year ago

              Your assumption that the person you are talking to isn’t familiar with it gives away that you are full of bullshit. Pick up a bunch of history books irl and read them from start to finish. Stop learning from memes and reddit posts.

              • DankZedong
                link
                fedilink
                26
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                The person I’m talking to links Wikipedia articles and tells me to read ‘history books’ lmao. Of course I’m not taking it seriously.

                • @cloud@lazysoci.al
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -221 year ago

                  And who do you take seriously? People telling you exactly what you want to hear?

                  You seem familiar with Marx so cross check yourself the data with Wikipedia

                  • ∞🏳️‍⚧️Edie [it/its]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    15
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Ah yes, cuz Wikipedia is the holy grail of information. No, don’t read stuff by yourself, don’t pick up a book, just use wikipedia.


                    fucking liberals

                    Damn, you’re proving why we have this emoji

              • ∞🏳️‍⚧️Edie [it/its]
                link
                fedilink
                16
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Ok. I mean, I’m not going to do it IRL, since I have them on my tablet, but I’ll go read Blackshirts and Reds, Triumph of Evil, the Book of the Hopi, The Cold War and Its Origins, The Hidden History of the Korean War. I’ll also recommend you read them.

                Edit: How could I forget Killing Hope?!

                • relay
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  121 year ago

                  Whichever the media, you get and understand its contents.

                • @cloud@lazysoci.al
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -191 year ago

                  Read them all and draw your own conclusions on whether Stalin was a brutal dictator or someone to worship. I suggest you to read on paper or eink display to not strain your eyes.

                  • comrade-bear
                    link
                    fedilink
                    2
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    https://dessalines.github.io/essays/socialism_faq.html#did-the-soviet-union-repress-and-kill-millions-of-people Again, why don’t you address nothing that’s been presented here, if you are so sure on your points, you can certainly present a competent argument about why those sources are not to be believed or why the other sources are better, let’s debate history, sources, methodology instead of just calling people dictators and posting wikipedia links, again make an argument for the sources that constitute the wikipedia articles you are mentioning, let’s move the discussion forward, I’m not against the debate, but let’s have one, you are asking everyone to read stuff, but what about you read some of our stuff as well, and let’s have a civil discussion about stuff.