• Blazkowicz [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s my understanding from reading the various documents there that the court found Russia’s claims admissable, ie that the court had juristiction and the claims fall under this case rather than a new case. I’m not a lawyer so struggling to find where they discuss the merit of the claims themselves though. Can you elaborate on this further?

    • Salah [ey/em]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      A lot of this is a bit too technical for me to understand it well, but so far I’m understanding that Ukraine asked the court to rule that there was no genocide being committed by Ukraine, and that Russia filed a counter claim to dispute that, which was admitted by the court who requested Ukraine to respons which it hasn’t. I don’t understand if ICJ is actually researching if Ukraine committed a genocide or not, or if it’s just researching whether it can state that definitely no genocide took place.