Counter point, no one wants to deal with a drunk ex marine, especially if part of the family.
Honestly the biggest issue is how many people who are defending him so excited to say well I’ve never seen it so it’s fine a person running for congress had it. Only history people would know or care about an SS symbol
Counter point, no one wants to deal with a drunk ex marine, especially if part of the family.
This counterpoint would be credible if it were a typical cracker American family where racism of all kinds are habitually brushed aside, but a wedding with a hundred-plus Jewish Americans? No, Occam’s razor takes precedence, and the likelihood is nobody recognized it because, irrespective of the moral and social implications, most Americans do not have an in-depth knowledge of even basic history or Nazi symbolism. Otherwise you’d have to argue that even if he had the swastika or SS bolts tattooed on his chest, nobody at that Jewish wedding would’ve confronted him—not very credible in my estimation
The facts that underwrite the premises of a critique are what make or break the argument; otherwise, we move from a socialist analysis of a given situation to a liberal conception of politics where the vibe is God, and to my immense frustration, a lot of leftists have dived headfirst into radlib framings and argument styles without regard for basic facts, which in my opinion, makes no sense considering again, this douchbag is the definition of a target-rich-own environment
Counter point, no one wants to deal with a drunk ex marine, especially if part of the family.
Honestly the biggest issue is how many people who are defending him so excited to say well I’ve never seen it so it’s fine a person running for congress had it. Only history people would know or care about an SS symbol
This counterpoint would be credible if it were a typical cracker American family where racism of all kinds are habitually brushed aside, but a wedding with a hundred-plus Jewish Americans? No, Occam’s razor takes precedence, and the likelihood is nobody recognized it because, irrespective of the moral and social implications, most Americans do not have an in-depth knowledge of even basic history or Nazi symbolism. Otherwise you’d have to argue that even if he had the swastika or SS bolts tattooed on his chest, nobody at that Jewish wedding would’ve confronted him—not very credible in my estimation
The facts that underwrite the premises of a critique are what make or break the argument; otherwise, we move from a socialist analysis of a given situation to a liberal conception of politics where the vibe is God, and to my immense frustration, a lot of leftists have dived headfirst into radlib framings and argument styles without regard for basic facts, which in my opinion, makes no sense considering again, this douchbag is the definition of a target-rich-own environment