This is an admin post, intended for blahaj lemmy users. Top level posts from members of other instances will be removed.

==

Edit - Hexbear announced plans to deferedate from us.

==

After recent events, it feels to me that sentiment has shifted and more people are asking for defederation of hexbear than previously

I’ve been doing my best to try and mend bridges and keep us connected, as it’s my hope that we can maintain trans solidarity and work with them, despite the friction, however, ultimately, I feel that this is an issue for the blahaj lemmy community to decide, not the admins alone

So here’s what we’re going to do

We’re going to leave things as they are for a week. That will give time for things to calm down whilst we see if we can work together. After a week, I’ll put up a vote and get a feel for where the community is at in regards to our continued federation with hexbear. That poll will run for a week. If there is a strong will to defederate (a clear majority), then that’s what we will do

  • @some_guy
    link
    2110 months ago

    I don’t think admins owe anyone a vote on federating in good faith. I have no critique of your others points, as they are all your opinions and my disagreement with them is simply my opinion. But I think calling out an admin for trying to grow the Lemmiverse (federate with a new instance) is asinine. It’s on them to take proper action as needed after, not before.

    • @Switchboard@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      7
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Acknowledging full well that I have no say in whether an admin consults their user base before federating or not, I don’t think this federation was done in good faith; and I’d easily put forth the conduct of the instance they federated with as evidence. There’s nothing wrong with trying to grow the lemmiverse but federating with an instance of known trolls is absolutely silly. I acknowledge the fact that Ada may not have known before, but afterwards the trolls came out in force and it doesn’t sit right with me that we’re being asked to give the people who tore up the landscape so recently another chance, with no sort of caveat, given that the only change on their policy was to lay off meta posts specifically. I’m objecting specifically to the way they’ve shat up the instance, so the fact that their only concession is to lay off meta posts is no comfort at all.

      Edit: fixed a mobile-ism