Bear in mind, it’s a ratio! As far as I understand it, anything above 50% means you upvote more than you downvote.

It specifically describes downvoting as being part of a bad attitude. Not sure I’m in agreement with that at all. So, to be perceived as having a great attitude, I’m supposed to love everything here 100%

Not quite. There is more on the fediverse than you could possibly vote on, up or down. Which means that the stuff you are voting on is the stuff you have curated in to your feeds, and decided needs interaction. And it’s reasonable to say that if most of the stuff you are choosing to interact with is stuff that makes you hate vote it, then you’re probably not carrying a positive attitude

Edit - And for what it’s worth, you have a 100% attitude on my instance, because we have downvotes disabled! :)

This is me too. Though I can generate an inner steam of words, those words have no audio qualities and are purely conceptual. They also come “after the fact”. I’m thinking of words, rather than words being the medium of my thoughts.

“acting” your age says everything. If you’re acting, you’re not living authentically. And sometimes that’s just how it is. But if you’re aspiring to a life that involves confining yourself so that you can live on other people’s terms, maybe you should dream bigger.

I think you have the wrong community…

Think of it this way.

“I went back in time to save my family” in an infinite timelines story means that going back in time spawns in infinite number of worlds that didn’t exist before, in which the family doesn’t make it, and an infinite number in which they do. And not a single one of those families is the “real” family of the person who went back in time.

The fact that the author choose to focus on one perspective in which it seems like the time travel has made a difference, doesn’t change the fact that it didn’t make a difference, and the family they were trying to save is gone. The infinite copies weren’t “saved” from anything, because there are infinite versions that weren’t.

The only way to tell a meaningful story in that situation is to create situation where the actions of jumping back in time alter the future of the person jumping back in time. And that means you either suck up the paradoxes, or you write a clever story in which the paradoxes are neatly accounted for before they ever occur (or you write a closed loop story)

Edit - Or you could tell a non infinite loop story, where a single universe is spawned by the act of jumping back in time. That still won’t save the “real” versions of the family you jumped back to save, they’re still gone, but at least it creates only a single version of them that the character can save.

A trans person is even more aware of how shitty a situation that is, which means, when they tell you their name, they’re aware of the consequences and are telling you what feels appropriate for them. The best thing you can do is trust them, and follow their lead.

Invincible can’t move between the infinite timelines though, and no storyline is hanging off of the important changes he makes those timelines by travelling through time/dimensions. He’s not “saving” anyone by jumping through to another universe

Feel free to remain sus :)

Yep. And you’d be right to be sus if I used a new account with little history to make implications about another user

That’s exactly my point! In an infinite timelines story, there is nothing that has special meaning over the others, making it boring, because it’s all irrelevant!

We don’t require email verification. There is no email. This seems to be a stubborn bug to iron out though, because I would swear the PieFed dev fixed it…

Asks the week old account…

.blahaj admins/mods will ban you from every space they control

I don’t moderate any communities outside of blahaj.

It’s not a “common practice on blahaj”. It’s just how lemmy does instance bans.

I generally don’t community ban people, I tend to instance ban them, because if they’re breaking community rules, but not instance rules, it’s up the community mods to deal with, and if they’re breaking instance rules, they get an instance ban.

And when you instance ban someone, and choose to remove their content, that’s what it looks like in a modlog. It’s not because I’ve gone and selected a whole bunch of community bans. It’s just how lemmy works

The reality I experience is the only one that matters to me. To an outside observer, all of them are as equally real and there is no true timeline.

In a story, there is no real, there is only outside observers…

Is there any way of forcing it to rebuild places and trips? Somewhere along the line, most of mine disappeared. It’s still building new ones just fine as GPS logger adds real time data, but most of my historical stuff is gone.

The actual data is there, and it shows up fine on the maps for each day, but the places/trips/stats etc are mostly empty.

I can’t see anything in the logs that might explain it

Apologies, I copied and pasted the answer below from another reply I made elsewhere in this thread

==

I’m not talking about about the possibility of real infinite dimensions. I’m talking about sci fi, and stories, which is the context of the OPs question.

In a “real” scenario, the experience that matters is the one I’m having, not the one other versions of me might be having.

But in a story, there is no “true” timeline, or a more “real” timeline. They’re all being retold to us indirectly, and the choice of the version of the person retelling those experiences is arbitrary by the author. It doesn’t matter what perspective the author chooses, because every other outcome also happened, the author just didn’t tell us those stories.

I’m not talking about about the possibility of real infinite dimensions. I’m talking about sci fi, and stories, which is the context of the OPs question.

In a “real” scenario, the experience that matters is the one I’m having, not the one other versions of me might be having.

But in a story, there is no “true” timeline, or a more “real” timeline. They’re all being retold to us indirectly, and the choice of the version of the person retelling those experiences is arbitrary by the author. It doesn’t matter what perspective the author chooses, because every other outcome also happened, the author just didn’t tell us those stories.

You’ve shown your kid that he’s in charge of his own body, and shown him that you can be trusted if he approaches you with sensitive or embarassing topics.

What other people think is irrelevant, because your relationship with your kid will be forever better because you’ve shown him you can be trusted.