Honestly, just using this as an excuse to reiterate that J.K. is using her Harry Potter wealth to actively hurt trans people.

    • CXORA@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      And… that is different from separating art from the artist.

      Hope that helps.

      • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        How? Definitions I can find are all similar to this:

        Separating the art from the artist is a known concept defined as a manner to discern people’s appreciation of an artist’s work from their hate for the creator’s actions or opinions.

        Source

        That is all. Consuming the art and appreciating it no matter who created it. This doesn’t mean it has to be purchased. The idea is simply that you don’t have to say, burn Rowling’s books that you have purchased once upon a time as mentioned in the opinion article. Or delete some artist’s music from your music player, put movie DVDs into microwave oven, delete all photos of a certain painting, etc…

        • CXORA@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          How is the sentiment of separating the artist from the art different from not giving money to transphobes?

          Literally every part of it.

          Hope that helps.