• corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fuck yeah.

      Also missing from sub-clauses, at least in America, is the trailing delimiter comma.

      • Psychadelligoat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Took me a minute of googling to be vaguely sure you meant what I think you mean: the comma marking the end of your dependant interjectory clause there?

        at least in America**,**

        If so: I have no idea what you are talking about, that’s drilled into us in school. Maybe people get lazy on the Internet but it is part of the rules and gets taught and used here

        If I’ve misunderstood: what are you talking about, then?

    • uuldika@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I reject, protest and censure your endorsement of the Oxford Comma.

    • hactar42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      My company has standardized document templates and none of them have Oxford commas. I will go through and add them any time I have to use one.

    • Wilco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Are you for or against it? I mean, it does have it’s uses.

      • some_guy
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        For it. Its lack of use in a union contract was a factor in a court ruling some years back. That’s when it went from pedantry to real-world consequence for me. Something was ruled similar to A and B rather than A or B.