And all of this IMO is why the war in Ukraine has been allowed to continue. It’s live weapon/ technology testing for modern warfare
I think innovation like this, that is so cheap and accessible, is terrible for the super powers. I’m imagining if this type of thing was available in the Iraq or Afghanistan wars, the US would have had a MUCH worse time.
I would think it would be in the best interests of any first world country with a tendency toward… wars away from home… to limit the advancement of technology like this.
I think innovation like this, that is so cheap and accessible, is terrible for the super powers. I’m imagining if this type of thing was available in the Iraq or Afghanistan wars, the US would have had a MUCH worse time.
Yup, on both points. That said, we’ve only seen what disorganized and underfunded groups struggling to survive could do with the tech in Ukraine. Imagine what a superpower could bring to mass production, long range delivery and mass coordination coupled to a first class military - china or the us. And it’s going to be peer adversarial - drones sometimes take out other drones in Ukraine, in the next major conflict we’re going to see swarm vs swarm actions.
You can’t jam the signal when it’s directly connected. Think ethernet cable to wifi. The war heavily uses drones. It’s been a cat and mouse game that Ukraine has been winning and this is the latest innovation.
You wouldn’t want to. Lives could depend on the next drone’s mission, why risk losing it from a kink in the fiber? Also, the time putting it back on reels is better spent elsewhere. Fiber is very, very, very cheap compared to all other expenses in war. You don’t collect brass to re-load ammo on the battlefield either.
Which is significant how / why?
deleted by creator
Removed by mod
deleted by creator
I think innovation like this, that is so cheap and accessible, is terrible for the super powers. I’m imagining if this type of thing was available in the Iraq or Afghanistan wars, the US would have had a MUCH worse time.
I would think it would be in the best interests of any first world country with a tendency toward… wars away from home… to limit the advancement of technology like this.
Yup, on both points. That said, we’ve only seen what disorganized and underfunded groups struggling to survive could do with the tech in Ukraine. Imagine what a superpower could bring to mass production, long range delivery and mass coordination coupled to a first class military - china or the us. And it’s going to be peer adversarial - drones sometimes take out other drones in Ukraine, in the next major conflict we’re going to see swarm vs swarm actions.
shit’s gonna get crazy fast
You can’t jam the signal when it’s directly connected. Think ethernet cable to wifi. The war heavily uses drones. It’s been a cat and mouse game that Ukraine has been winning and this is the latest innovation.
But wouldn’t fiber optic cable over long distance add so much weight as to impede flight or carrying munitions? Is it shockingly lightweight?
deleted by creator
Another benefit is that most of the fiber will be on the ground as you get closer to the target. Your drone will get lighter as it flies.
Could you reel it back in after the drone explodes for reuse?
You wouldn’t want to. Lives could depend on the next drone’s mission, why risk losing it from a kink in the fiber? Also, the time putting it back on reels is better spent elsewhere. Fiber is very, very, very cheap compared to all other expenses in war. You don’t collect brass to re-load ammo on the battlefield either.
That makes sense.
I’m going to bet they’re older spools for tow missiles.
Think fishing line. It’s so thin it weighs basically nothing.
Impressive. Thank for the info.
Any weight at all is going to effect the drones ability, but fiber optic cables are very very lightweight, being just a wrapped strand of glass.
Using wireless to control the drone makes the drone and operator very easy to detect. Controlling via fiber it’s mush harder to detect.