Hellfire103 to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish • 3 months agostoplocklemmy.caimagemessage-square139fedilinkarrow-up1612arrow-down1192
arrow-up1420arrow-down1imagestoplocklemmy.caHellfire103 to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish • 3 months agomessage-square139fedilink
minus-square@thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.calinkfedilink20•3 months agoWell it certainly gave us alot to chew on.
minus-square@Ensign_Crab@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish10•3 months ago alot Do notional creatures count?
minus-square@MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.netlinkfedilink9•3 months ago“Chew on”, in this case, is a figure of speech meaning “think about,” typically in a different light than previously afforded on the topic. No one would actually eat an alot. Alots are intelligent and friendly.
minus-squareNightwatch Adminlinkfedilink8•3 months ago No one would actually eat an alot. Alots are intelligent and friendly. So are pigs, unlike humans. Still, eating pigs is generally accepted, while eating humans is not.
minus-square@Aurenkin@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink5•3 months agoI would say it depends on the human. Same reason why I only eat jerk chicken.
minus-square@thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.calinkfedilink7•3 months agoOf course, they are very important!
Well it certainly gave us alot to chew on.
Do notional creatures count?
“Chew on”, in this case, is a figure of speech meaning “think about,” typically in a different light than previously afforded on the topic.
No one would actually eat an alot. Alots are intelligent and friendly.
So are pigs, unlike humans. Still, eating pigs is generally accepted, while eating humans is not.
I would say it depends on the human. Same reason why I only eat jerk chicken.
There are exceptions.
Maybe for you
Pigs are delicious tho
Of course, they are very important!