• @KevonLooney@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    -103 months ago

    Only if all that information is formatted the same. That’s not going to be the case. Who’s going to reformat it? Not you, I assume.

    • @mosiacmango@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      173 months ago

      If we are at a stage where people are mandated to report their disciplinary data, requiring it be in a consistent format is a pretty straightforward hurdle.

      The difficulty of police cooperation for data reporting is already so insanely high and utterly opposed by police departments, the minuta of handling that data is a minor hurdle in comparison.

    • @Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      143 months ago

      There’s a whole field in CS that deals with this kind of thing.

      It’s not nearly as hard as you’re making out; I do it every day.

      • @KevonLooney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        -93 months ago

        There’s a whole field in CS that deals with this kind of thing.

        It’s not hard

        🤔

        Are you saying CS isn’t hard? Yeah everyone knows regex is super easy.

        • @Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          73 months ago

          Sanitizing and merging data sources isn’t some arcane art in which one needs decades of training to be proficient.

          Like I said: I do it every day.

          But go on and tell me how hard my job is; I’ll put it on my performance review.

            • @Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              53 months ago

              Then I guess I don’t understand what point you’re arguing.

              Because I guarantee someone would do the job if the data was available.

              • @KevonLooney@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                -5
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Who’s going to pay for that data from every tiny PD to be sanitized? Every PD will be slightly different and they may change vendors every couple of years. It sounds like a nightmare.

                My point is you don’t want or need “all the data”. You only want the 0.001% that involves use of force.

                • @Baahb@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  5
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  You have a bad take. Yes all of the data. If my offense are public information, then offenses against the public, mundane or severe, should be public.

                  Edit: on retrospect, police conduct data should be public regardless of the public status of my or your record.

                  Offences against the public should be documented publicly.

                • @Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  3
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  My job has clients who change vendors constantly, too.

                  It’s not nearly as big a deal as you’re making it out to be, especially since you don’t even know if your unlikely hypothetical scenario even happens.

                  So… Whatever I guess.

    • @some_guy
      link
      43 months ago

      Ok we get it. You’re averse to police accountability. Just come right out and say it. I may not respect your opinion, but I’ll respect you for owning up to it.

      Or, I dunno. Don’t comment.

    • @stembolts@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I really really hope for your sake that you are a “confrontation bot” and not a real person arguing this, because if this isn’t a bot, then you spend your limited time on this earth in a… sad sad manner.

      Anyway, everything you mention can all easily be automated. You’re not on reddit. We’re mostly tech people here. Your bullshit is transparent.

      You’re a good rage farmer though.

      Congratulations?